• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Fully Embedding Wikidot Backrooms into Vs Battles Wiki

Status
Not open for further replies.
and we’re basically only indexing backrooms wikidot, which is arguably most popular wiki and similar to scp in terms of how they deal with canon, the format, etc.
 
I don't think this is the case. More people recognize the big SCPs than they do the big Backrooms monsters
Yeah but generally speaking, they'd know only specific scps mostly 173, 096, 049 or 939 upon other good ol reliables but they'd know more about backrooms as a whole including the levels, the entities and generally the "no-clip". Nowadays people mostly recognize 173 as a walking peanut that snaps your neck contained by the foundation.

Even if at this point in time the Backrooms haven't usurped SCP's throne, they certainly have a significant following comparable to theirs.
 
Not the case.

Now, the first conversation on this happened a long time ago, so it would be good help if someone could link the previous thread. That being said, a lot of Backrooms content was deemed far too lenient and lax for the wiki, and SCP was noted to have significantly higher standards. I can’t really debate the specifics without looking over the previous thread because I can’t remember shit.
We discussed it a while back and you've rewrote the rule into this, but I am not sure if it was ever added to Editing Rules, despite it being accepted. Prior to that message Agnaa mentioned there being quality control mentioned, but I was lazy to go deeper.

Point is, can someone link wiki's rules so we can determine if they are strict enough at this point in time (yes, Wikidot is banned here, how could you tell?)?
 
We discussed it a while back and you've rewrote the rule into this, but I am not sure if it was ever added to Editing Rules, despite it being accepted. Prior to that message Agnaa mentioned there being quality control mentioned, but I was lazy to go deeper.

Point is, can someone link wiki's rules so we can determine if they are strict enough at this point in time (yes, Wikidot is banned here, how could you tell?)?
If wikidot be banned. Then SCP would be banned too wouldn't it?
 
Last edited:
Blue & White was completely deleted for featuring some copyrighted side-characters tho
SCP has no canon. It's not the same as the Blue & White, as with SCP, its lack of canonicity you can dismiss sections of the site without affecting other sections at all.
 
How so? In actually contributing to the site or the over all quality? The former yes, it is harder to actually add to it, but it's not impossible for random people online like me and whatever to get in there and artificially inflate powerlevels for battleboarding. The latter is subjective and if stuff like Velma has profiles, there shouldn't be a discussion on this specifically

That aside some SCP's blatantly infringe on Copyright like Here.
Yes it is. You literally can't do that.
 
still implies that there is some form of canonicity
"There is no canon" is a moniker that anyone can write whatever they want as long as it's upvoted enough regardless of contradictions, not a ban on writers crafting distinct "canons." Nevertheless, this makes SCP's canon fluid enough for us to readily disregard parts of it without affecting the verse as a whole.
 
"There is no canon" is a moniker that anyone can write whatever they want as long as it's upvoted enough regardless of contradictions, not a ban on writers crafting distinct "canons." Nevertheless, this makes SCP's canon fluid enough for us to readily disregard parts of it without affecting the verse as a whole.
I see
 
So, perhaps I made a mistake.

When I asked for rules of Backrooms wiki to check quality control, I said that Wikidot is banned. What I meant is that Wikidot is banned in my country so I can’t check them myself. Oops.

Hindsight is 20/20, whatever.

So, any rules?
 
So, perhaps I made a mistake.

When I asked for rules of Backrooms wiki to check quality control, I said that Wikidot is banned. What I meant is that Wikidot is banned in my country so I can’t check them myself. Oops.

Hindsight is 20/20, whatever.

So, any rules?
Oof
 
So, perhaps I made a mistake.

When I asked for rules of Backrooms wiki to check quality control, I said that Wikidot is banned. What I meant is that Wikidot is banned in my country so I can’t check them myself. Oops.

Hindsight is 20/20, whatever.

So, any rules?
 

"What will happen if I avoid the greenlighting process?"​

Remember, greenlights are a requirement, not a suggestion. If you coldpost an article, it will be deleted, regardless of if it's in deletion range or not. The user coldposting will receive a message urging them to review this page, along with the source code of their article so that they may receive genuine critique on the article. If the user proceeds to continue coldposting, they may be banned.

As y'all can see. There is a form of regulator inside backrooms wikidot. @Bobsican said he can put a tier 0 penguin in there. Let him try.
 
technically every entity and person in the backrooms could have acausality type 1 due to how time works in the backrooms
 

"What will happen if I avoid the greenlighting process?"​

Remember, greenlights are a requirement, not a suggestion. If you coldpost an article, it will be deleted, regardless of if it's in deletion range or not. The user coldposting will receive a message urging them to review this page, along with the source code of their article so that they may receive genuine critique on the article. If the user proceeds to continue coldposting, they may be banned.

As y'all can see. There is a form of regulator inside backrooms wikidot. @Bobsican said he can put a tier 0 penguin in there. Let him try.
Also: A "greenlight" is a term used as a go-ahead for posting, sort of like a green light at stoplights! On our site, it's used so that our greenlighters can give permission to users looking to post their articles on our wiki!
 
Well, green light is mandatory, good, but what does it involve?

Rules of fandom wiki seemingly unrelated to wikidot..? Yes, no? We are talking solely wikidot for now.
 
Well, green light is mandatory, good, but what does it involve?

Rules of fandom wiki seemingly unrelated to wikidot..? Yes, no? We are talking solely wikidot for now.
Essentially, a new user requires 15+ ratings for their page to be accepted to be posted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top