Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Backrooms is too new to have anything that powerful, but considering the SCP Foundation went from one 4chan /x/ post to one of only seven Tier 0 verses we have in a decade, I wouldn't put it past the Backrooms to get such a rank after a few more years of metastisizing.If that's Jerry from Tom and Jerry, then it's an overkill and Jerry stomps bro.
BTW, where does the backrooms cosmology scale to according to your opinion? I don't know much about that since I am not really much into the backrooms. Like, does any character have the potential to be boundless or smth?
Bad and powerscaler writers who only write for the sole purpose of powerscaling:The Backrooms is too new to have anything that powerful, but considering the SCP Foundation went from one 4chan /x/ post to one of only seven Tier 0 verses we have in a decade, I wouldn't put it past the Backrooms to get such a rank after a few more years of metastisizing.
One punch man chapter 36:The Backrooms is too new to have anything that powerful
Built differentOne punch man chapter 36:
YepI am genuinely surprised about how a Backroom thread is not getting attention. I thought this would be over within a day or two lol.
Add “(Backrooms)” at the end so it’s not confused with other verses withuhm if they do get added the names should just be ''Entity N'' where N is the entity number (so nothing else) ex just Entity 121
cuz i made a mistake in their titles
Could someone link the previous threads to the boss over here.Not the case.
Now, the first conversation on this happened a long time ago, so it would be good help if someone could link the previous thread. That being said, a lot of Backrooms content was deemed far too lenient and lax for the wiki, and SCP was noted to have significantly higher standards. I can’t really debate the specifics without looking over the previous thread because I can’t remember shit.
It was re-debated on this thread which didn't seem to end with a decision to allow the Backrooms.
Ewshould be a staff discussion
FormerlyI thought this already got rejected?
it was literally said to not be allowed. and then 2 staff came in and rejected this oneFormerly
Formerlyit was literally said to not be allowed. and then 2 staff came in and rejected this one
no, they are currently not allowed. you haven't made any arguments as to why it should be allowed backFormerly