- 15,605
- 11,917
Actually, Stephen Hillenburg confirmed Spongebob as Asexual and Nickelodeon has done so too, they've even used him in lists of their LGBT+ characters during Pride Months.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
LGBT additions to the Vsbattles wiki
- Thread starter CosmicWreck
- Start date
- Status
- 342
- 107
Since when did Spongebob become asexual?
- 165,207
- 72,190
Was he ever portrayed as identifying as such within the show? And can you link to Hillenburg's statement please?
- 15,605
- 11,917
I know little about Spongebob, I'm just going by the Wikipedia page here
Hillenburg statement (there's others)
Season 2. Episode 32a portrays him reproducing asexually like sponges
Nickelodeon lists him as a LGBT character (imgur link since you have twitter blocked)
There's not much room to argue when he's literally listed as LGBT by the people who own him
- 15,605
- 11,917
And ones who blatantly showcase this, I hope, if two dudes kiss we usually don't really need author confirmation to say they're gay. This won't usually apply to ace characters, but still it should be for others (and ace ones too, in certain specific cases)
- 165,207
- 72,190
Okay. That seems fine then.
Okay. That seems fine then, but somebody would need to concisely explain the other terms in easy to understand manners, so I can update the category explanation text and then move the category accordingly.
Well, or bisexual, but it still fits under the LGBTQ+ umbrella.
- 15,605
- 11,917
Here's my shot at it
"Characters that are officially defined or confirmed as being part of LGBT, which includes homosexual or transgender characters as well as other gender and sexual identities."
Yeah, definitely, I was simplifying
- 11,064
- 13,764
Yeah, the latter statement I meant about the QIA+ since it's difficult to show or there can be confusion.
- 165,207
- 72,190
That is far too vague. This is an indexing wiki. We need to be very specific regarding exactly what does and does not qualify.
- 165,207
- 72,190
It seems best to ask them to provide some official evidence.
- 8,927
- 3,439
I'd say this is a fair response. "LGBT" is a very large label with a lot of identities under it, and anyone who reads "LGBT" should and would probably understand what we are referring to. As long as we agree to apply it to anyone who falls into those identities, I don't see a need to sweat the small details or make it into anything more than a minor issue.
- 165,207
- 72,190
Anyway, should I update the text to the following instead then?
"LGBTQIA+ Characters:
Characters that are officially defined as being parts of the LGBTQIA+ spectrum of sexual identities.
Take note that this category should only be added to self-evident cases based on genuinely reliable official information from the owners of the characters, whether it is in-story or out of story, both in order to ensure reliability and to follow our preexisting rules, and to avoid lots of future hostile arguments. It should definitely not be added based on fanon or headcanon."
"LGBTQIA+ Characters:
Characters that are officially defined as being parts of the LGBTQIA+ spectrum of sexual identities.
Take note that this category should only be added to self-evident cases based on genuinely reliable official information from the owners of the characters, whether it is in-story or out of story, both in order to ensure reliability and to follow our preexisting rules, and to avoid lots of future hostile arguments. It should definitely not be added based on fanon or headcanon."
- 12,662
- 9,597
A slightly related question, would characters who are beyond the concept of such things as gender - and changes their gender from time to time or others see them differently - fall under this umbrella too?
As an example, the One Above All. People perceives him differently - different species, gender, people, etc.
As an example, the One Above All. People perceives him differently - different species, gender, people, etc.
- 165,207
- 72,190
Anyway, should I apply this text, and change the category name from "LGBT Characters" to "LGBTQIA+ Characters" then?
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,210
Could you hold off for a hour or two until I have time to try and draft up my own suggestion?
- 8,927
- 3,439
Actually, you know what? I've changed my mind. I don't think this category should exist at all.
Look, I get why people may want it, but it just feels like a landmine. We're doing versus battles here, you know? I feel like it's such a dangerous field to open Pandora's Box on which characters are LGBT and which aren't. Hell, that's where all this drama started.
I am LGBT, and I do fully want characters defined as their preferred pronoun. However, adding an LGBT tag just opens a whole new, easy avenue for small-time trolling alongside an overwhelming, chaotic mess of trying to figure out if Naruto is actually LGBT or something ridiculous like that.
Personally, I think we should simply stick with listing the correct pronouns on their pages. To my knowledge, we don't have a tag for "Straight Characters", so sexuality shouldn't be at all relevant anyways.
Edit: And don't get me started on Yujiro. Oh lord.
Look, I get why people may want it, but it just feels like a landmine. We're doing versus battles here, you know? I feel like it's such a dangerous field to open Pandora's Box on which characters are LGBT and which aren't. Hell, that's where all this drama started.
I am LGBT, and I do fully want characters defined as their preferred pronoun. However, adding an LGBT tag just opens a whole new, easy avenue for small-time trolling alongside an overwhelming, chaotic mess of trying to figure out if Naruto is actually LGBT or something ridiculous like that.
Personally, I think we should simply stick with listing the correct pronouns on their pages. To my knowledge, we don't have a tag for "Straight Characters", so sexuality shouldn't be at all relevant anyways.
Edit: And don't get me started on Yujiro. Oh lord.
- 21,143
- 30,099
There's a lot of categories that need to be deleted tbh, a shit. ton of useless ones
Like this
vsbattles.fandom.com
What is its' purpose
Like this
Yandere Characters
vsbattles.fandom.com
What is its' purpose
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,210
I mean searching categories like these are useful for finding thematic matchupsThere's a lot of categories that need to be deleted tbh, a shit. ton of useless ones
Like this
Yandere Characters
What is its' purpose
- 10,775
- 18,704
- 3,460
- 1,717
I agree.
It also may be subject to other arguments such as:
Azathoth is LGBT (transcending the binary of Gender)
There is also the scenario regarding Oryx. He is neither male nor female, but his gender is quite literally "King".
It only precipitates more debates which likely aren't necessary.
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,210
As for this issue
I had an idea on how to tackle this in the description, but am more iffy on this part and would like to hear input on whether it’s ok
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,210
Rather simple, does the Gender of “King” exist in the standard way Male or Female does in our own world in Oryx’s verse? If it does, was it the gender Oryx was assigned at birth/has had his whole life? If the answer to both is yes, then he is cisgender, and would not qualify for the category. If the answer to either question is no then he is not cisgender and would qualify for the category
- 11,064
- 13,764
I concur with this. Really not looking forward to have more gender/sexuality debates on VSBW. Just like an argument was made in the last thread that AMAB/AFAB terms feel like unnecessary labeling, a character's sexuality also feels the same, it's not that relevant, why label it? I can see that it can be useful for thematic matches but that's just it. Quite negligible gain. Not having it will also save a lot of time dealing with unnecessary debates.
- 14,753
- 20,583
Taking all the controversies (read: shitstorms) we've had recently into consideration I am kinda having second thoughts on this.
- 165,207
- 72,190
I think that my version is more neutral and to the point informative in its language. It seems better to let our visitors simply click the Wikipedia link that I provided for further information. Also, many people who identify as their born gender seem to find the "cisgender" term annoying and/or offensive to force upon them.
Well, given that I have seemed cause controversy recently (whenever I have started to blabber about my rather anti-totalitarian and left-libertarian ideals), it is probably best if I mostly stay out of this argument.
For the record, I do not really know whether or not it is better to have or not have such a category.
The pro-side is that it is good for indexing purposes and people who want to find characters that they can identify with.
And the con-side is that it will likely invite lots of hard-to-spot vandalism, speculative additions, and aggressive arguments, especially if there will be ongoing pushes to list all abstract characters that are beyond gender, or characters that have not been officially defined to belong to this category.
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,210
Tbf that’s always going to be at it’s highest as the idea gets introduced. Once we set very clear guidelines on when and when not to apply the category, the wiggle room for interpretations leaning one way or the other should be very low. If you’re talking about people protesting the existence of the category, just point them towards this thread, say it was accepted, and if they keep on banging on about it let them do that to an empty audience. We have people who complain about ratified standards literally all the time
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,210
Huh, learn something new each day. Sorry then, your version is likely better
- 8,927
- 3,439
If we use wording that eliminates wiggle room, there will be inevitably people who disagree with that lack of wiggle room in the future. Trying to put a hard standard on what is LGBT and what isn't is a travesty in the making. I'm really just not interested in seeing threads about the real-life implications of wacky anime shit and the nonsense that will follow.
- 165,207
- 72,190
That seems like a sensible addition, if we keep the category, yes.
- 165,207
- 72,190
The DC Comics wiki has separate categories for Homosexual Characters, Bisexual Characters, Transgender Characters, and that seems to be it. Would separating the LGBT category in this manner, and avoiding any more complicated additions, be a better solution?
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,210
We’re not “putting a hard standard on what is LGBT”, we’re putting lines down to prevent characters not officially confirmed in any sense as LBGTQIA+ as being indexed as such by this wiki. There’s a massive difference. People disagree with all kinds of standards on this wiki, we don’t shut down any and all rulings on them just because of that. All our guidelines prevent is headcanon or possible/mild implications being used to index a character as LGBTQIA+ by the wiki, they don’t decide what is and is not LGBTQIA+, they decide who is officially confirmed as belonging to that group. That is a very objective and easy to discover matter for 99.99% of characters on this wiki
- 8,927
- 3,439
What you find to be a "massive difference" is definitely not as easily defined as you think it's going to be. People disagree with standards of all kinds on this wiki, but not only are LGBT topics far more volatile than other topics and standards we have, but we have no reason to be discussing them in the first place. The same 'guidelines' presented to prevent headcanon can and will be used in unexpected ways to cause problems, and even if they somehow aren't, it will only lead to debates over what qualifies and why they don't.
There is absolutely no reason to go out of our way to index this. Having observed what happened in the past, I cannot see it ending in any way other than a complete dumpster fire. At the very best, it will be a slow, painful thorn in our side that will be progressively harder to take out the longer we let it linger.
As for DC comics, that categorization could work, but I still don't think it's necessary. It's not particularly important, and our wiki isn't focused on indexing these matters in the same way. Not to mention, we deal with a much wider array of characters than DC Comics, including far more characters that exist as extremely dubious edge cases on a wide spectrum difficult to determine.
I don't want to deal with these arguments. I don't think any of us do. I highly, highly encourage us to save ourselves the trouble and not do it.
- 39,360
- 15,190
Yeah, this is why i'm in neutral but inclined to disagree, if this get accepted then we're going to be in hellish time to deal with those negativity due of LGBT, sure what Saman said are true but we still have a limit on how we can handle this stuff
As i said, i'm fine if this going go through but with consequence.....like a very big consequence
As i said, i'm fine if this going go through but with consequence.....like a very big consequence
- 39,360
- 15,190
But then again, "thematic matches" being mentioned here for a reasom why we don't need this stuff made me feel that we, the match-makers are being pressured lel
- Status
