- 692
- 354
Look at the placement of the moon; it's the same. The spine in the moon is at the back, while the front is pointed towards Earth. Yet in this chapter we visibly see stars being present where the void's supposed to be.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
One-Punch Man CGT: Settling the Topic of Serious Punch²
- Thread starter Kachon123
- Start date
-
- Tags
- one-punch man
- Status
- 190
- 108
it's clearly different gosh, look at it again, load it carefully
they made a hole in the middle of the moon and the earth then when they came back and saw the moon and the earth were aligned
- 4,097
- 1,358
There is the massive jump from Tier 4-A to 3A to consider so again, that is more like a hypothetical thing, not a solid thing as we still need feats with AD/RPL though tbf.
Last edited:
- 369
- 97
Is it generally agreed that his limiter is broken and he can potentially reach a much higher tier if he so wished? If so, where's the harm in "At least 4-A, potentially far higher with AD"?
- 10,724
- 9,504
No need. Higher works fine. Adding "potentially" makes it seem like it's more specific than him just fighting someone and getting stronger.
- 13,900
- 5,395
so we do agree that he can reach 3-A, but we shouldn't put it on the profiles? I suppose that makes sense in a way, I'm fine with this
just remember, anything's better than "Yamcha solos one punch man" ever coming back
just remember, anything's better than "Yamcha solos one punch man" ever coming back
- 359
- 232
Phoenks after this thread done,will we make thread about Saitama ping pong speed calc ?
- 4,097
- 1,358
- 13,900
- 5,395
I'll be seeing you on the saitama vs goku thread my friend....
but enough derail from me, I have done my part (contributed nothing) and must now lurk.
- 13,900
- 5,395
please do, the AD is a new major power and it'd be a shame if it gets overlooked with the regular "nlf + needs feats" arguments
- 4,097
- 1,358
It is considered derailment from the original topic on what calcs we using though.
- 4,097
- 1,358
What?
It is not even invalid on the fact we don’t get a tier with a what if scenario given the fact we still need feats to begin with.
Edit: Also AD is not a new power.
Last edited:
- 4,097
- 1,358
As for the relevant staff input, here is the following inputs to consider
“If you ask me, USK's low-end version makes the most sense given the current visuals.” From @KLOL506
“If you ask me, USK's low-end version makes the most sense given the current visuals.” From @KLOL506
Also there is Therefir’s further confirmation about supporting 4A.
- 369
- 97
One small thing is bugging me, btw. Given that this happened because of the clash of two serious punches, can this be replicated by just Saitama alone?
- 7,144
- 3,655
I feel like this Saitama will casually achieve a massive feat that we can upscale Garou to.
- 2,997
- 1,414
Well both he and Garou were reactively upping their power levels vastly over the course of their fight, so by fight's end their singular serious punches should be superior to their previous serious punch²
- 4,097
- 1,358
Tbf, the feat did involve Blast redirecting the combined energy clash between Garou and Saitama so not sure if that is legit the case anyway.
- 16
- 5
Of course it's a bit more vague because I just counted stars, neutron stars would up the feat while some pussy yellow stars would down it (you still get a fine average with e+27 of them). There was no real reason to calc the radius of the cone twice but I did it for the normies to see that the max range radius has the same relation to height as the other one.
- 4,097
- 1,358
Bruh
- 5,909
- 5,936
Just to give my take real quick:
Even from down here on Earth, with all of the pollution, galaxies that are millions of light-years away can occasionally be seen, such as the Andromeda. The fact that there is no light left in that void whatsoever, even viewing it from up in space, means we can deduce it at LEAST reached out of the Milky Way galaxy, and possibly even other galaxies. The thing is, we don't have confirmation that there were galaxies in its path. It's fully plausible, hell it could even warrant a possibly or likely on the pages I would say. But without confirmation, it is still technically speculative, and thus the safest way to go would be 4-A.
Even from down here on Earth, with all of the pollution, galaxies that are millions of light-years away can occasionally be seen, such as the Andromeda. The fact that there is no light left in that void whatsoever, even viewing it from up in space, means we can deduce it at LEAST reached out of the Milky Way galaxy, and possibly even other galaxies. The thing is, we don't have confirmation that there were galaxies in its path. It's fully plausible, hell it could even warrant a possibly or likely on the pages I would say. But without confirmation, it is still technically speculative, and thus the safest way to go would be 4-A.
- 4,097
- 1,358
Not necessarily especially since the galaxies are shown to being intact after the feat in question.
- 5,909
- 5,936
What galaxies and when?
- 4,097
- 1,358
from Chapter 168. https://**********/read/imgur/mUagtWL/1/33/
- 5,909
- 5,936
Well that's just a different direction. The blast only traveled one way.
Side note, I also think it's kinda odd that there are perfectly visible galaxies there when Saitama and Garou are right next to Earth.
- 4,097
- 1,358
Those are technically stars being showed though, not necessarily galaxies.
- 5,909
- 5,936
The object on the tip of Garou's left horn is a star?
- 13,900
- 5,395
well the graph indicates that saitama got around at least 16 times stronger during the fight so uh
yes, yes it can
- 4,097
- 1,358
I talking about this scan. https://**********/read/gist/OPM/167/11/
- 5,909
- 5,936
Okay let me go over this again.
I went over this in my earlier post. There could have been galaxies there, but from what we understand, meaning no explanation, it can only be gathered that they were stars. Then you said the galaxies were intact, I was confused, then you posted a page from this latest chapter showing galaxies, even though that was in a different direction. I mentioned that it was weird how there were perfectly visible galaxies there when Saitama and Garou were right next to Earth, even closer to it than the moon.
I don't know what the confusion here is caused by.
- 4,097
- 1,358
I am just clarifying we going by the stars being destroyed of course.
Anyway, now that is settled.
- 16
- 5
Most distant star to date spotted – but how much further back in time could we see?
The Hubble Space Telescope could gaze back 13.4 billion years, and with the JWST we expect to improve on this possibly to 13.55 billion years.
theconversation.com
In theory this means you can't even use this star for your calcs because if the beam only hit the star cluster in front of it, you'd never see the star again, but it's still there.
- 2,997
- 1,414
Redirected, not changed in output. The clash was still 4-A amounts of energy regardless of outside tampering, Blast just kept it from hitting Earth
- 2,997
- 1,414
They misspelled the star name lol
Most distant star to date spotted – but how much further back in time could we see?
The Hubble Space Telescope could gaze back 13.4 billion years, and with the JWST we expect to improve on this possibly to 13.55 billion years.
In theory this means you can't even use this star for your calcs because if the beam only hit the star cluster in front of it, you'd never see the star again, but it's still there.
Not important, just thought it was funny
- 4,097
- 1,358
We showned that Blast did have help in redirecting the blast as the other heroes weren shown though.
- 16
- 5
Most distant star to date spotted – but how much further back in time could we see?
The Hubble Space Telescope could gaze back 13.4 billion years, and with the JWST we expect to improve on this possibly to 13.55 billion years.
I know no one even uses the star I linked, but I wanted to point out the problem with gravitational lenses.
I searched a bit further and could not find any clear evidence that we're seeing V762 Cas through such a lens. However, this article here implies that every noteworthy star is only visible due to these gravity phenomena:
"Scientists observe object using NASA space telescopes Hubble and "Spitzer"and these observations were made possible by the natural cosmic "magnifying lens". This lens is actually a huge cluster of galaxies, whose overall gravity warps spacetime, producing what is called gravitational lens... When light from a distant galaxy passes through a lens like this on its way to Earth, it is amplified."
Being obviously pedantic here, but in theory you'd need to recalc everything for the furthest anything you can see which is not behind such a lens. At least if you wanna get an acceptable low end result.
Googling for that is nothing but pain and the best solution I can propose is using this tiny dataset here:
The Brightest Stars
It lists the brightest stars, the one furthest away has a distance of 3000ly to earth. Not exactly scientific to say "just use that one" but if it's one of the brightest and among the brightest, it's the one furthest away, then we have a basis for a possible pick.
Maybe someone else make a better suggestion, but I see a serious problem with (just) calcing for Cas.
Last edited:
GodlyCharmander
He/Him- 5,744
- 4,996
That is one hundred percent not something we can assume from the fact the hols lacks any light. There's this thing called "age", which Galaxies has a lot of, which is why their light from millions of Lightyears away can even reach us.
But that is not the case with stars, no. The furthest one we can see (with a naked eye) is around 16000ly! That's not that far! This means that, if a general direction does not hold a visible galaxy, destroying only the stars would be sufficient to get the similar effect.
- 2,997
- 1,414
Really doesn't matter. All they did was redirect it so it wouldn't destroy Earth/the solar system
- 4,097
- 1,358
Yeah, but time to wait for this thread to finally close
- Status
