• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

RisingIons said:
Clown isn't bad
Click to expand...
I give the benefit of the doubt and I assume that you have never heard someone say clown as an insult (I remember ABD old times), then clown itself is not an insult, but in a certain context it is, this is because in a certain context it means you can't be taken seriously and your opinions are entertainment stuff just like what clowns do (or indicating they are funny or ridicolous), in a way it can be expressed even worse than that, like some who think that being a clown in the real sense it is not dignified (yes, I'm serious, some people think that). but it's an insult either way, so ye.
 
Antvasima said:
A warning explanation seems enough for this. If he continues to be ongoing generally rude and disrespectful in the future, we will likely ban him though.
Click to expand...
Is some other staff member willing to handle this please?
 
Antvasima said:
A warning explanation seems enough for this. If he continues to be ongoing generally rude and disrespectful in the future, we will likely ban him though.
Click to expand...
I have left them a warning on their wall, feel free to review it to make sure it is sufficient.
 
AKM sama said:
I blocked this user for vandalism.

User contributions for Esaıu | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom

vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
He was inserting swears in pages in a different language and changing many characters to tier 2/1
Click to expand...
he did it to Eren again, I fixed it. I think he's from somewhere close to my country and he seems to have a grudge against the character (because he wrote a heavy insult) Anyway, I'm just asking out of curiosity, you figured out how it's a insult .... it should be hard for someone from another country to understand, because he did shortening that big insult :unsure:
 
Hello, I’ve noticed this decision is partially based on the idea that I arbitrarily use GMs.
On this CRT, I used one because I found it consistent with the article linked above its link.
That being said, when have I used GMs in an arbitrary way?

And now that I’ve touched the topic, I’m responding to a few accusations.
“[A]ll he ever does is says, ‘They’re tier 9 because I said so’”: Pardon? I’ve never said “It’s like that because I say so”.
“[D]eliberately ignores every single feat in existence”: I’ve exposed “those” mentioned in the profiles and, after they get replaced by “others”, I’d expose them as well.
“[M]akes terrible pet peeves. Like ‘It’s only a small gem, it can’t possibly have good feats’ ignoring the fact that they do.”: I said it can create dimensions and amp its user.

I’d like to receive answers to my question in the first paragraph, please.
 
@Somelatinguy They were literally answered multiple times in the various threads you made, but I will address the other things.
  • First of all, you literally did. You just said, "They get tired from smashing blocks so they should be wall level" and no further context. That's no different from saying, "They're wall level because I said so." Not to mention this is 100% pure headcanon with no evidence since block smashing has always been extremely casual.
  • You did not debunk a single feat; all you said was "They're meant to be funny" which is a pet peeve and not a refute. Gag or not, bounching the Moon like a basket ball with a Country level calculation, throwing an entire castle off screen, tanking the explosion of a stadium at point blank, ect are all solid feats. Not to mention, lore scaling is a thing.
  • Also, he did have a couple universal feats that were strait up durability feats. And the artifacts used to create dimensions do scale to other stats given our policy on universal power sources. Creation feats were often casual.
Anyway, this is really not the place to discuss it, and you were still banned from making content revisions similar to this. So honestly it would be wisest to basically drop the topic entirely.
 
Somelatinguy said:
Hello, I’ve noticed this decision is partially based on the idea that I arbitrarily use GMs.
On this CRT, I used one because I found it consistent with the article linked above its link.
That being said, when have I used GMs in an arbitrary way?

And now that I’ve touched the topic, I’m responding to a few accusations.
“[A]ll he ever does is says, ‘They’re tier 9 because I said so’”: Pardon? I’ve never said “It’s like that because I say so”.
“[D]eliberately ignores every single feat in existence”: I’ve exposed “those” mentioned in the profiles and, after they get replaced by “others”, I’d expose them as well.
“[M]akes terrible pet peeves. Like ‘It’s only a small gem, it can’t possibly have good feats’ ignoring the fact that they do.”: I said it can create dimensions and amp its user.

I’d like to receive answers to my question in the first paragraph, please.
Click to expand...
Wait, do you actually think Mario is 9-B?
 
Rtxthegamer
Again, I’ve exposed “those” mentioned in the profiles and, after they get replaced by “others”, I’d expose them as well.
What if those "antifeats" are legit and those "greater feats" are misinterpreted?

DarkDragonMedeus
I said Mario gets a hand pain and Luigi used to get a headache, which comes from the official answer to a question “posed to the gaming giant for decades.”
QuasiYuri says the official answer is just a joke, yet I'm wrong when saying those comical moments are just jokes?
I could explain those "feats" and "scalings" if I were allowed to make VGCRTs again.

Fastestthingalive50
And I have good reasons for that.
 
Now, in response to the original report:

Over the past few months Somelatinguy has made multiple hilariously bad CRT's regarding video game verses (Here, here, here, and here).
Click to expand...
1) Metroid: A few objections caught me off guard, but my position wasn’t really debunked.
The CRT was closed because Chariot190 lost patience.
2) Pokémon: I made a big mistake in the OP, but I made up for it later.
The CRT was closed because others still focused on the mistake.
3) Sonic: I actually debunked all of Theuser789’s objections.
The CRT was closed because QuasiYuri said something unrelated to that.
And despite being told to stop by staff, he tried to restart the exact same thread on the same day.
Click to expand...
4) Mario: Although I should’ve held back longer before posting an edition, I had my reasons.
The original CRT was closed because others focused on the GM whose use I already explained.
5) BTW… Kirby: Since it wasn’t my first one on the series, I made an absolutely flawless OP.
Pop Star, Halfmoon, Ripple Star and the Divine Terminus being in the same galaxy means a lot of facts I could explain if I were allowed to make VGCRTs again.
He has been reported for this stuff since 2018.
Click to expand...
Although I did derail a little in this reply's point 2, “offensive ≠ non-offensive supernatural power” isn't nonsense, the point 1 is still valid, and let’s not forget the point 3.

Banning me from making VGCRTs would leave everybody without chances to learn something new, so that unfair ban should be completely revoked.
 
I was literally there on most of those posts, and you still literally proved nothing. On the Metroid example, you also literally copy/pasted a blatant troll blog from CharacterRant. Which literally everything in it was 100% pure headcanon. He kept saying, "She was amped when the high end feats happened" when the entire plot was that she was actually nerfed and she did the feats as soon as she restored herself to normal power levels. In the Super Power Bomb example was still only a mere fraction of Samus Aran's true power. It wasn't closed because he lost his patience, it was closed because you were literally ignoring common sense.

I'm not knowledgeable on Pokemon, but others actually did address the "New points" but they weren't actually new.

The Sonic example, I did not see any debunking either.

Everything was literally still 100% copypasta from the same thread as well as a multitude of previous threads. Besides, I literally so no scans of the hand pain or headaches not to mention those also sound on par with Z fighters getting slapped by Bulma. And still did not properly refute a single of the hundreds of feats unfathomably above Tier 8 to the point where it wasn't even a point.

All the Kirby examples are even worse than all the aforementioned examples. All I saw was a big list of "Wario is 10 feet tall" levels of bad arguments.

Finally, you're pretty much derailing the RVR thread which is also ban worthy offense if kept up. At the very least, taking up in DMs would be more preferable than bombarding the same threads or spamming this one. But even then, if someone asks you not to DM them or leave them alone, respect them too and also basically drop it if those people don't want to go over them again for the umpteenth time.
 
Theuser789
You gave a Like to the reply poisoning the well rather than debunk my reply.

DarkDragonMedeus
1) I said "And even if those manga series were the same canon level as the games..." first.
- No, he ignored an important aspect and later pointed out others without supporting them.
2) They only focused on my previous mistake.
3) Just look carefully.
4) A copypasta of points that hadn't been refuted.
  • An official answer leaves no need for scans.
  • Again, I've exposed "those" mentioned in their profiles and, after they get replaced by “others”, I’d expose them as well.
5) You're cordially invited to refute that last CRT.
Conclusion) I'm just saying how banning me is wrong.
 
The feats came from canon manga that were actually confirmed canon via interviews, not to mention there are still multiple feats on the same level even outside the manga and in the storylines of the actual games that scale to characters Samus is canonically superior to.
Don't have time to comment on other things, but Shake was also refuting your points
Actually, they have been refuted long before your first topic ban was inserted; and yes, scans are 100% important because no one has ever heard of those statements. Actually show where the statement is stated.

And no, banning you is justified. If a user pulls the same problems that got someone banned in the first place despite countless warnings, that is case and point grounds for much stricter bans on the spot.

Anyway, I have to go to work and I and the rest of the community would really appreciate it if you would just leave this topics be.
 
@Somelatinguy We have a page about Game Mechanics, things that happens in game mechanics like characters not being able to destroy a tree or an wall is not canon to the Plot unless stated, the feats comes from the informations from Lore wise
vsbattles.fandom.com

Game Mechanics

Game Mechanics refers to the abilities shown in games (usually video games) that are determined by the rules of the game (examples include hit points, levels, statistics, world map crossing in seconds outside of cinematics, etcetera) and are not necessarily indicative of a character's or...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

at this point, we should stop talking about this convo, it is a derailment to the rule violation reports, take care pal, try to check the game mechanics page
 
I don't wanna vouch for a ban for anyone unless it's very blatantly justified, but holy shit.
Ban Latin from all video game based franchises in regards to CRT's besides like maybe, visual novel shit or non player controlled games, this has been going on for over a year, it's always the same with the same reasoning and the same non-existent issues and fallacies, the majority of his arguments are based on entirely game mechanics like "Why doesn't Samus just shoot down the whole game world to get to a boss", even though that isn't how games are made, some are even on par with "10-C Halo because Chief dies in a puddle of water on contact" tier arguments.

I don't want to vouch for a ban unless it's explicitly needed but it's beyond warranted at this point, he's already been CRT banned from them before for months and like day of, he continued it again and obviously, he's still doing so.

I wouldn't say a permaban or even a ban at all, just hard CRT ban him, that's where the issues are, but unlike last time, perma CRT ban from video game verses.
 
If that's the case, has he made any since? If not, he technically hasn't broken that ban yet, and it just needs to be kept that way, but if he has...
Or if the issue is him derailing other CRT's, well, ban him from those too.
 
DarkDragonMedeus
1) I talked about that interview on my CRT, and I could expose those feats in the games.
2) Where?
3) Also here, where? And those statements are still there… “Actually show me where the statement is stated”? I thought everybody had it by now.
Conclusion) They’re not the same problems, so the ban isn’t justified.

Bernskastell
Videl > Whis is a non-canon GM, yet Whis > Videl is a canon one.
Others such as being unable to smash steel walls may be non-canon in Kratos’s and Dante’s games, yet they’re canon in the Lone Ranger’s and Indiana Jones’s games.
Question is: Are they canon in Mario’s and Link’s too, or not?
So, that page makes this fallacy.
This is the short version of the explanation to “using GMs not to be rule violation”.

The_Wright_Way
And I’m proving that third report wrong.

I can only reply to the replies that appeared when I came back.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
8 9 10
Replies
367
Views
23K
Polandballczechball
Polandballczechball
Mr. Bambu
Slight Adjustment to Rules Regarding Original Works
Replies
37
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Locked
Regarding the Rule Violations Report Thread
2
Replies
71
Views
5K
LephyrTheRevanchist
LephyrTheRevanchist
H3110l12345I20
IRL Paper has a profile.
Replies
28
Views
911
JustANormalLemon
JustANormalLemon
DarkGrath
  • Locked
Proposal for Off-Site Rules Revision
2 3
Replies
93
Views
8K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top