I find the need when we had a 2-A thread in the past, and you went away and conceded on those points because you had nothing. You can't expect someone to not be annoyed if you're going to repeat your arguments after they were already rejected.
Well, no, this is needless drama and false.
That 2-A thread has nothing to do with this stat Star has as the feat was another, I pointed out some concerns that other users saw and built from there and I went away when I couldn't help more, I never saw before this 2-A stat Star has. And even then, why being annoyed or antagonist at me? I don't want downgrades for the sake of downgrades, just accuracy and clarity, it would take far less time for everyone to just tell me the reasons why they think I'm wrong and be done with it without extra filler.
This went from "It didn't affect any other dimensions aside from Star and Marco's" to "not all dimensions". I'll take that as you acknowledging your prior point was wrong and conceding it. It's very much implied to be to all dimensions. They are pulling dimensions together that were originally connected by the Realm of Magic, something that connects to all of the dimensions in the verse, it's that simple.
That very much makes it look like it's gonna be legit, but the profile still needs better evidence for it, and the wording from it doesn't cut it.
You can see a starry sky and multiple planetoids brought in as well after the dimensions fuse, none of which were at all present in Earth's sky originally. We don't need to see a literal animation where you see bubble universes become one. That's being so unnecessarily picky to the point it makes no sense at all. I hope you realize that we only get to see the fused world for like less than a minute of time on-screen. So yeah, of course, it's not going to address every little nitpick that you want to see to make sure the feat is 100% undoubtably objective. That's why schools teach you this thing called "context clues" though where you can understand a greater idea without having to be shown it. Also, saying "it could be this" doesn't debunk the argument at all. Again, this is conspiracy theorist logic. The wording itself is fine; it describes what the feat is. She literally fused the multiverse into one world when doing it with Marco. That's again very nitpicky at best, not an actual complaint that delegitimizes the feat.
No need to be childish and point out how "schools teach you this thing called "context clues"", legit the thing you said before was just starting to tackle why this was 2-A, to say
that, which you didn't before, and now something lesser, and then point out how I should have known by context makes no sense. Saying "it could be this" would have debunk theargument w/o, again, the actually reasons you just state for it, as it would have taken less speculation. The wording is vague and up to interpretation, as I said before as far as anyone reading knows Star alone fused the multiverse with Marco Diaz and the multiverse and Marco became 1, a wording a bit more clear would be "Along with Marco Diaz, they fuzed the multiverse into 1 universe", and an actually competent and honest wording would just be the it's shown they did+what implies it was with the whole multiverse, letting anyone reading make the conclusion themselves and not just biblically read over what we came out with based on evidence and reasons shared among some unshown in the profile. That's "very nitpicky", it's the description of her most powerful stat in a wiki about stat, if you think that vague sentence is ok then you're doing things wrong here. Have I not said before that I don't want to delegitimize the feat but know the reasons for it and that the reasons given so far sucked and that you were on the defensive for no reason?
I'm saying that if we went through your interpretation that it only sucked in the planets, it affecting all of those other dimensions would cause this as a byproduct. You should understand just how stupid this sounds when I repeat it back to you.
I was yet to buy it affecting all dimensions.
It's because you're stating things without ever having watched the show. The OP provided links to the feat in question, and you just randomly decided to assume the Whispering Spell was the cause of it when that's literally the opposite of what the show establishes.
If it was so randomly then anyone could have explained the feat w/o the extra "They are pulling dimensions together that were originally connected by the Realm of Magic, something that connects to
all of the dimensions in the verse", which needs to be said and wasn't on the videos.
If you're unsatisfied with something, you should be asking for an explanation. You shouldn't be saying the page is stupid for what it's saying when you seem to be outright admitting you don't know the context of the feat. That's not really the page's fault at that point since you came in here to argue it was wrong and not even looking at anything else to see how that conclusion was derived.
This is delirious at this point, I did ask for the feat, they gave me something incomplete, I said that
that was wrong and that the profile lacked any evidence and was vague, which it is. I never said the page was stupid like some hateful person, I pointed out its error aiming to have them be fixed. And stop talking about not knowing the context of the feat when the profile itself doesn't show anything and you claim that's fine, anyone reading it is meant to know as much as you do, which the profile doesn't do a good job at, therefore it's needs to be fixed and it is the page's fault. Nobody needs to go see "how that conclusion was derived", that's some weird stretch you do to make things look at your favor, anyone would need to just read the profile like always.
I don't see how that's cheap at all. I'm pointing out the fact you've been called out for this type of needless specifism in the past, and you're repeating it on this thread. Derail would imply it's not relevant; it's relevant if you've been told not to do something but continue to.
This too I see as delirious, and narcissistic, I can't talk about that topic as it has nothing to do with this thread, you put me in a position where I just have to kindly let you get away with you pointing out at random a thread where people disagreed with me, yet you seem to just still believe you're right on the matter regardless not putting it to discussion. Take this as a staff giving a warning: Do not make more needless drama and please try to be less antagonistic.
