• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
i'd go out on a limb and say it's INCREDIBLY close since both of them can amp to around the same AP, with Zoro being faster and Erza being stronger and tougher. Honestly I wouldn't say no to a rematch once 100 year quest and One Piece are over.
 
No, seriously, Yang vs Tifa is actually pretty good. It's far from the best "Wrong" episode, but it's genuinely good. It has a way worse "Wrong to Good" ratio than Guts vs Nightmare.
  • Bad animation
  • Bad research
  • Tainted with possible bias (a literal ad for one of the characters in the show!)
  • Yang is completely out of character
  • Tifa lost
  • I'm still salty

This is the worst Death Battle of all time. I would watch Justin Bieber vs Rebecca Black on loop before I even glimpsed that episode ever again.
 
Raiden's matter hax that gives him durability negation is macro-quantum which is >>> the molecular resistance of Adamantium
They literally showed another comic character who uses similar technology to Raiden's sword cutting through adamantium and used that as the reasoning.
Also ok, I dig it. I'm just skeptical on the whole cutting-small = durability negation.
 
He's not cutting small stuff, his sword vibrates at an extremely high frequency, which causes the molecular bonds of the things it hits to disrupt.

Btw, it disrupts even beyond just molecular bonds, it's basically physics-based matter hax.
 
He's not cutting small stuff, his sword vibrates at an extremely high frequency, which causes the molecular bonds of the things it hits to disrupt.

Btw, it disrupts even beyond just molecular bonds, it's basically physics-based matter hax.
Okay, that sounds a lot better. Is disrupting the molecular bonds kind of like limited molecular-manipulation then? Because then yeah, I can totally get behind the outcome.
 
Okay, that sounds a lot better. Is disrupting the molecular bonds kind of like limited molecular-manipulation then? Because then yeah, I can totally get behind the outcome.
It is, that's matter hax, not even limited. It can cut through anything regardless of its durability as long we stay within the 3D realm (I think), because the very atoms that make the target are separated via super high vibrations.

The fancy and science-specific explanation is linked in Raiden's profile and comes from the game.

DB compared it to the artic vibranium which exists in the Marvel universe, which has an even weaker effect, as it effects only the molecules (iirc) and melted adamantium on contact.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top