• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Robo432343
Robo432343
phainon destroying those galaxies didn't actually happen
CastoriceTheFifth
CastoriceTheFifth
Sure buddy
image.png
Hey grath
Could you evaluate this please?
Dunno if it falls in the "reasonable timeframe" section
Thanks
Hi, could you take a look at this?
Drite77
Drite77
In what ways? And when recalcing a feat, you need to mention why you're recalcing a feat
Hercules1125
Hercules1125
In accordance with the edits which he asked me to make, and I was recalcing it because I thought the earlier calc was too much of a lowball
Drite77
Drite77
Looking at both, I prefer the other calc more. I think the assumption of using 20 km and a timeframe of 5 seconds works better for that feat when compared to your assumption of "he must match the speed in which Mezoreia gathers them". We also normally work with Lowballs, but I think a tier 5 result for a Cloud clearing calc "As far as the eye can see" is way too much of a highball, dare I say, it is probably wanked
Hello, quick question.

These profiles on Fandom are some of the most detailed, well-cited, and well-referenced profiles I have ever seen in my life. When making a CRT, is it acceptable to pull from and link to these pages as references in the CRT?
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Wiki pages aren't considered reliable sources, no. Instead, you can just... use the references, that these pages use as references.
Ninkan12
Ninkan12
Fair enough - Would I need to go through each reference and get the specific clip? The profiles already on the wiki are, to say the least, very incomplete, so pretty much the entire verse and each profile would need to be revamped from the ground up.
  • Like
Reactions: Uradial50
LandonTheGuy
LandonTheGuy
well it's one of my friends, i don't even know wtf is a 5-D (i kinda roll with what he says), he's a nice dude so if you feel like it you shouldn't have the equivalent of getting shot in a knee of talking online.
Uradial50
Uradial50
Aren't you a mod?
"Mr Lambu, Caught being a caveman"- Jk
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
I'm a mod who dislikes tiershit and people who push it. is this meant to be an insult lol.
Hi vietthai, sorry for bothering you, but can you give your input on this crt? I would greatly appreciate it.
could you take a look at this?
Hey Drite is it too early to send this to be reviewed by you?


If so then I apologise and I’ll try to ask someone else to review it instead. Viott had told me it was fine after some corrections and I would also like to thank you for your contribution since without it Study Group would still be in a bad spot.

There are also two final calcs of mine but I don’t plan to send that until 2-3 weeks and from there I don’t plan to make anymore since I’m quite burnt out from calculating. Thank you again.
Hello planck, would you mind checking out this crt? Viett already gave him opinion

Hi, could you check this thread please? it's been half dead since I opened it, it just needs a couple more votes to go, and the stuff is pretty much self evident in the scans. Thanks
Hi, could you check this thread please? it's been half dead since I opened it, it just needs a couple more votes to go, and the stuff is pretty much self evident in the scans. Thanks
Hello, could you ping some of the guys that are knowledgable in h1a+? Or maybe close the thread if the votes are good enough? It'd be great if you could take a peek at it yourself or something. Thank you very much
Hello. So I was proposing this on self-evident intelligence revision thread, I don't know if I need approval from Ant himself or basically thread moderators and the likes like usual, since that's the first time I commented on that thread so Idk how that works. If it's the latter, I hope you can evaluate it. https://vsbattles.com/threads/self-evident-intelligence-revisions-thread.133518/post-7831170

I mean, I initially wanted to be a separate self-evident CRT for it, but I saw people proposing their intelligence revisions in there, so.. I think I might do it as well.

Thanks.
Hello Drite77, Could you help check these calculations?
  • Note: This is a Manhwa calculation and a standard AP calculation. Therefore, I believe it should not cause any issues for you. I created this calculation with the intention of upgrading Mid-Tier characters and above.
Thank you in advance for your help. 🥰
Drite77
Drite77
The comments make me think otherwise
Black_Cat49
Black_Cat49
I apologize if my message gave you that impression.🙏

However, I truly believe this calculation will not cause any issues for you. Please trust me on this. And if, after reviewing it, you still think it is incorrect, I will absolutely be willing to revise and correct it.
Hello Lephyr, sorry to bother you. If you have the time, could you check this thread?
Can you check this CRT please?
Hello Vietthai, sorry to bother you. If you have the time, could you check this thread?
Vietthai96
Vietthai96
Closed, though did you apply thing according to what was agreed by Bambu and Spaceman?
MSahla
MSahla
Of course I did. Just look into the accepted characters' profiles (Xiuhcoatl, Azhdaha, Ineffa, Ronova and Cyno). You'll find me in the edit's history.
  • Like
Reactions: Nierre
Vietthai96
  • Like
Reactions: MSahla
Back
Top