• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Rusty can you please check the "volumetric destruction" part of the first calc of this thread: https://vsbattles.com/threads/chainsaw-man-minor-calc-fixes.192098/

@ElJoaki5 tagged you a few days ago alongside a few other CGMs but you didnt came, its only about violent fragmentation being used over fragmentation for Oregon Sword compression, Eljoaki5 wasn't sure so he wanted some other CGMs to give their opinion
TheRustyOne
TheRustyOne
I have so many problems with many of those calcs that it actually annoys me.

I don't want to start an argument, nor do I care enough to try. I'm already stressed enough, so I'd rather not have people yell at me.

Ask someone else.
Breadbear83
Breadbear83
I didn't say about needing the 5 calcs (all are evaluated, some accepted some rejected(, just the Oregon calc in the violent fragmentation part if you could check I
But I can find another CGM then, sorry If I annoyed you
I just need one more check here on the mach 1 cap please
could you check this when you are available?
Drite77
Drite77
Doneso
Tahoy49574
Tahoy49574
97db8dcd3f2a8cfb0b9d8db9125aff6f.jpg
Hello, if you can, could you look at this CRT?
Hello, if you can, could you look at this CRT?

Hey Maverick. hope your well. I know you won't know this verse, but due to it being new & not well known, revisions for it aren't getting any traction here so far. Whenever you have a moment, I was hoping if you could please give your thoughts on this thread I made.
Can you please evaluate this thread? Its about downgrade from Tier 1

Can you please evaluate this thread:

Can you please evaluate this reaction feat, and potentially this AP feat?
Pls help me Agnaa

Hello Elizhaa, I'd appreciate your input on this small thread.
Idk if you can evaluate calc's (but I've asked all CGM atp), but would you be able to evaluate this "somewhat controversial" feat? I feel obligated to also show the two other versions (1 and 2) and having this feat evaluated it would be appreciated!
Idk if you can evaluate calc's (but I've asked all CGM atp), but would you be able to evaluate this "somewhat controversial" feat? I feel obligated to also show the two other versions (1 and 2) and having this feat evaluated it would be appreciated!
Hello, if you can, could you look at this CRT?
Hello, if you can, could you look at this CRT?
Drite77
Drite77
Do not come to my wall asking for an eval if the calc was just made
Machmatej
Machmatej
then how long do i have to wait to be allowed to send it?
Drite77
Drite77
I don't want to put a timeframe on it, otherwise people will wait that amount and then send it to me. Use the Calc Eval thread, if it doesn't work, you can start sending it

Would you please give a vote here, its been in a state of no movement for months, its 2-1 in votes from staff as of writing this

Would you please give a vote here, its been in a state of no movement for months, its 2-1 in votes from staff as of writing this

Would you please give a vote here, its been in a state of no movement for months, its 2-1 in votes from staff as of writing this
Back
Top