• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Could you comment on this, please?

Dear Theglassman12, I have a question.

If someone is stated to be "immutable to changes", that they can deny unwanted changes as a result and therefore no attack or anything can do something to them, would that be Acausality Type 5? If is a problem if it's a "state" they need to activate/They can deactivate it too?
Theglassman12
Theglassman12
That doesn’t sound like Acausality, that sounds like self defensive causality hax.
SweetDao
SweetDao
Will it not even be eligible for Limited Acausality 4? I just want to be sure, I'm fine with whatever seems the most reasonable
Theglassman12
Theglassman12
No because it’s not something tied to their existence, it’s an ability they can activate and deactivate. It’s the same as saying intangibility is the same as non corporeal when the latter is your existence lacks a physical form to begin with and the former is something you can turn off and on.
  • Like
Reactions: SweetDao
Hello, Ultima, I have a rather simple question.

We know that 2-C or 2-B > Low 2-C[timeline/universe], inasmuch as that 2-C or 2-B are basically multiple amount of Low 2-C constructs.
However, the same doesn't apply to 2-A, insofar as that "multiple sets of infinite universes" are still 2-A [according to the FAQ] because countable infinity x countable infinity still results in, well, countable infinity.

However, which one of this methods apply to Low 1-C?
If we take Low 1-C as a Hyper-timeline, then multiple of said Hypertimelines should still be bigger in size then a single Hyper-timeline, the same way a normal set of more than one 4D timelines is bigger in size then a single 4D timeline, right?
Or are we gonna assume the 2-A mechanic here and say that multiple Low 1-C constructs [where each construct is X-size] are still equivalent to a single Low 1-C construct [of X-size], even if each of the Low 1-C constructs is causally[as a space-time] isolated from each other?
You might be interested in this.

Mr. Bambu have you played Fromsoftware games?. just curious to know.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
No.
Lordhesperus
Lordhesperus
thanks for answering my questions, also i want to ask What do you think is the Hardest FromSoftware Game? for me it's Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
It's probably like, King's Field or something, but of the ones I've played (Dark Souls, Dark Souls 2, Dark Souls 3, Bloodborne, Sekiro, Elden Ring) it's probably Bloodborne. There's like. Variable points of difficulty in each one. Manus from DS1 is a lot harder than most of what comes after. But for general difficulty, I'd say Bloodborne.
When you get the chance could you check this out?
Know ur tackling the Touhou verse rn but when you get the chance could you check this out?
Howdy! I wanted to apologize for distressing you in that Hunter thread a few days ago. That was not my intention but I am sorry I upset you regardless
Are two votes enough from the administrators to make a thread accepted?
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
Unless it's a Tier 2/1 upgrade or a popular verse, then two is typically enough.
It's been a while.

I notice in a post you made last week you said, "I was willing to leave this wiki behind, considering recent events", but I haven't been active for years, and I was curious. What kind of events were you referring to?
Sorry to drag you back to this. But i made a post summarising the arguments and wondering if you could give your thoughts on the questions at hand? Just so we can speed the thread up, thanks in advance
Sorry to drag you back to this. But i made a post summarising the arguments and wondering if you could give your thoughts on the questions at hand? Just so we can speed the thread up, thanks in advance
Sorry to drag you back to this. But i made a post summarising the arguments and wondering if you could give your thoughts on the questions at hand? Just so we can speed the thread up, thanks in advance
Hello, I hope you don't mind checking out this CRT
Hi! If you have time, can you check this out?
What do you Think of this 3 staffs agreed to this
the reasons for closing the thread?
Nnnnnnnnnnnnnmmmmm
Nnnnnnnnnnnnnmmmmm
the question is serious, because it is unclear why the thread was closed at all?
Maverick_Zero_X
Maverick_Zero_X
You were stonewalling. Also that thread was a mess.

If you want to try removing Orochi's High 6-A rating you can try a content revision thread, I suppose.

Nnnnnnnnnnnnnmmmmm
Nnnnnnnnnnnnnmmmmm
wait. Did I do stonewalling? so it was the fault of the person who asked for proof, and not the people who refused to give it?

absolutely the entire context of the thread and the message was that it was necessary to completely double-check a number of calculations that were made on the basis of some single data that is not confirmed anywhere except for isolated moments. and people started arguing about what is based on single data and is not confirmed anywhere...

The problem is not with orochi. He is her consequence
RethPo
RethPo
Sans should be multiversal through and through for "surviving" that last hit for a few seconds obvi
But yeah that was a long time ago, though sans still gets exaggerated in matchups from what ive seen. Tbh i kinda stopped caring much about battleboarding long ago unless its to mess with some numbers when im bored. Im only really involved in the touhou thread because ive been reading into its lore and cosmology more combine with saik requesting peoples aid and feeling bad enough to help
RethPo
RethPo
The thread is a pain in the backside to get moving and go anywhere though and's reaching stonewall territory. You think itd be worth it to just tag the staff and give them a quick rundown soon? If tagging staff works that is...
Can you take a look at this? It will decide the scaling of the entire verse. And thanks in advance
Back
Top