• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

You used Clint Edwards in a vs thread, so I was wondering if you have thoughts on getting the Welcome to the Game pages (which would include CLint) restored.

The_King_of_Prudence
The_King_of_Prudence
That ended up being more negative than I intended.
Frieza_force_soldier_100
Frieza_force_soldier_100
The verse didn't really have hax. It had hacking, stealth mastery, weapon mastery, and enhanced senses. I guess that may be why it was deleted. If they won't restore the pages, I at least need to get the source codes for the deleted pages so I can move them to another vs site like Joke Battles or Alt Battles. I will try and get them to restore them, but if they won't, do you have any idea who I should talk to about retrieving the source codes? If not, I may have to run around the website asking until I find someone.
The_King_of_Prudence
The_King_of_Prudence
Any admin or content moderator.
Mind checking out this thread
Hey, sorry to bother but could you help evaluate this thread if you've got the time

Hey Damage, if you've got the time could you help evaluate this thread

Can you check my Undertale thread and approve it (or disapprove it if you disagree)?
Would you like to be invited to my Marvel discord server?
Dust_Collector
Dust_Collector
thanks but not at the moment, I haven't had a device that can properly load up discord since like, last september. both my phone and current laptop are so bad they just can't load it up beyond the login screen for some reason so I have no access to it
  • Like
Reactions: Eseseso
Eseseso
Eseseso
Youch, sorry to hear that.
Dust_Collector
Dust_Collector
yeah, hoping I'll get access soon since I need to get a new laptop soonish anyway (I think my current one is gonna kick it any day now) but yeah sucks I haven't been able to use it. Had to resort to whatsapp for my irl friends which while not bad ain't great either
  • Like
Reactions: Eseseso
Hi. Can you check this revision thread pls
Hi. Can you check this revision thread pls
Interested in a 4-C duo tournament?
Interested in a 4-C duo tournament?
Interested in a 4-C duo tournament?
StrymULTRA
StrymULTRA
It does not allow me. Is this a sandbox?
Monsters_fight
Monsters_fight
Oh, you are right. It is. I will edit it
Monsters_fight
Monsters_fight
Here it is. Now its no longer on sandbox
Hi Bambu, could you check this out? Would like your input.
I know you can be quite busy sometimes but I heard you know sword art online so I was wondering if you could take a look at this Sao matchup if you have time

Thank you and I appreciate your help
Hello sorry bother you, can you give input this?

Hello ultima.

Having R>F transcendence over any 1-A structure would only scale one layer higher right(and not High 1-A)?

is it possible to define it in a way that it can reach High 1-A? if so how?
Sorry bother you, can you give input this?

Sorry bother you, can you give input this?

Sorry bother you, can you give input this?

I've been feeling sick and genuinely tired of responding to the same argument over and over again, so I put it aside, only to find out it was closed when I decided to come back. I may have approached my argument unprofessionally, but let's be honest, their main argument wasn’t solid, as it can be explain with "range," and the fact that there is literally an anti-feat against it only further weakens their argument.


To top it off, this is fiction, so any attempt to argue "logically" doesn’t hold much value, as it's a details that the creators most likely failed to account for.
Firestorm808
Firestorm808
Range doesn't change the methodology of the energy movement. It would still be immeasurable. See also Qaws' posts.
Worthless
Fiction. Such feats are possible without necessarily moving at that speed. We don't assume that an energy size equivalent to a basketball that's capable of destroying an infinite universe means ,= infinite speed, do we? And Qaw sounds like only stated the site standard without considering the arguments and anti feats against it.
Flashlight237
Flashlight237
How the eff did you get a message in one whole minute before another guy messaged me?
  • Like
Reactions: IDK3465
Flashlight237
Flashlight237
Well, I jumped in and checked. All but one calc (the smores dragon calc) is good to go.
  • Like
Reactions: IDK3465
Hello Planck, sorry bother you. Can you give input this?

Back
Top