• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.

Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.

Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.

Hey Ultima,
Could we possibly get a final decision on the Lord of the Mysteries CRT now that we have four staff approvals? The thread is starting to become cluttered, with some comments revisiting topics that have already been discussed, likely due to new participants not reading through everything.

Based on your input, would you agree to the following:
  • Original Creator: 1-A
  • Pillars: 1-A (Given weakened Celestial Worthy's ability to influence the Astral World and God Almighty being its ruler)
  • Great Old Ones: 1-A, Low 1-A, or Low 1-C? (These entities are stronger than Gods but aren't classified as Pillars)
  • True Gods / Sequence 0: Low 1-A or Low 1-C? (Considering their dominion over everything derived from these essences, do you think Low 1-A is more fitting?)
I believe we can move forward with whatever you decide on this.
Could you please give your input to this CRT?
Could you please give your input to this CRT?
Hi, saw that you helped out in a few Ultra Series revisions in the past. Would it be possible for you to give an evaluation on these threads? Just need one more staff agreement for both threads.


Hi, saw that you helped out in a few Ultra Series revisions in the past. Would it be possible for you to give an evaluation on these threads? Just need one more staff agreement for both threads.


Hello! If you have the time, can you give your input on this thread? Thank you!

Hello!

If you have time, could you check this Quick blog? I would like to hear your answer wether this is Tier 2-A or not.

Would truly appreciate it 🙏.

Hello!

If you have time for this quick blog, I would like to hear from you if this is valid for Tier 2-A cosmology or not.

Would truly appreciate it 🙏.

Hello! So... do you remember this crt? In the end we decided to drop 6D and go for 5D. So the first 5 pages are about the now rejected 6D while the 6th one is about the new 5D. When you have time can you please give your input?
Stillwinston
Stillwinston
Mass Effect is supposed to be undergoing revisions iirc so he might not even be 9-A for the record lol
StrymULTRA
StrymULTRA
Ah lmao.
Stillwinston
Stillwinston

Its been awhile since we talked about it but a few calcs are bunk, can try to argue for the heck of it though I guess lol
There's another Dan Hibiki thread going on. It's not mine, but I am involved, and we are currently experiencing a situation where we do have one character getting more votes, but people have stopped showing up to vote. I don't want this user's, mine's, and everyone else's contributions to go nowhere after all this. Would you be interested in taking a look?

Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.
Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.
Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.
Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.
Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.
Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.
Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.
Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.
Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.
Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.
Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.
Hey, could you please evaluate here, fairly short and simple AP revision, thanks.
hi if you can look at this:

Could you please close this thread, it has been accepted and grace has ended. Thank you.
hi

shinza thread:


Can u please give your input on this again? Just take your time i know you are busy. I am not saying it is bad but the input you gave lack of context and I do not find Georred reliable at all and Qawsed had already mentioned that 5D may work for our case despite having looked at our crt knowing the existence of parallel worlds and seperate timelines
Berga14
Berga14
Just to simplify your work:
The first 5 pages are about 6D, it got rejected. We are asking you if you can can give an input on the 6th page where we are discussing a 5D hypertimeline (basically right after your previous comment).
All Georred arguments have been discussed and in my opinion there is no reason to negate a 5D tiering.
Back
Top