• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Your opinion would mean a lot
Hi Grath.
Would you look at this thread?
Hi!
Would you look at this thread?
Hello.
I would be happy if you contribute to this thread.
Hello Firestorm!
You need to evaluate this thread.
Hi Qawsedf. If you have time, can you look at this thread?
Hi!
If you have time, can you look at this thread?
Hello. Your input would be appreciated.

Hello AKM sama. Sorry to disturb you but I have a friend of mine who wants to sign up to Vsbattle wiki forum and he did but his account got banned. I was with Antvasima but I was brought here. Idk if you could be of some assistance. Thanks.
AKM sama
AKM sama
Please tell me the username of your friend. Both in the wiki and on the forum. You could also ask them to reach out to me on discord.
45Saef
45Saef
Ok. I’ll inform them. What’s your discord tag or where can I find you on discord?
AKM sama
AKM sama
My discord tag is akmsama
Hello there, Ultima. My recent thread was closed even though there were only 3 administrators who accepted it (solely based on Planck69's reasoning which I had already refuted) while the other half of the staff were pretty much ambiguous/neutral towards my proposal. It's rejection was neither unambiguous nor unanimous. What do you think? Do you disagree with them?
Why'd you lock the thread? Only 3 staff members rejected it.
Planck69
Planck69
There's also no real minimum rejection requirement, certainly not more than 4 of them. So long as no staff member agreed to it, it would be a unanimous rejection by definition.
TyphonEX
TyphonEX
It says here though that we should get as many staff members as possible for "big or controversial changes" (which I'm under the impression that a Low 1-C GOW downgrade would be) though. Antvasima, Ultima_Reality, and Catzlaflame were all willing to look over the thread and possibly respond and make evaluations on the thread but were never able to do so. Even DarkDragonMedeus never made an actual concrete evaluation.

Also, since DDM's response wasn't exactly a solid evaluation in the form of a disagree or agree, it doesn't really count as a rejection vote. That makes just 3 staff members who rejected the proposal, which is practically (even if not officially) pretty much the bare minimum for proposals for verses with "significant following" or a large amount of material published. It's not a very good idea to close a thread before half the people likely willing to evaluate actually gave an evaluation. And it's not like opening the thread would do any harm either. There's only two CRTs going on right now and they're both already concluded, they just need to apply the changes already agreed upon.
Planck69
Planck69
This will be my last post on this matter, so sorry if it may not satisfy you but;

We don't act upon rejected threads the same way we do accepted threads, especially when there's unanimous staff rejection. Which this is, regardless of anything.

There's no minimum timeframe for closing a thread with multiple rejections and no agreements, in fact Theglassman12 waiting 48 hours from the OP was a courtesy given that he could've just closed the thread the moment Emirp disagreed.

There's also no major consideration for an uncontroversial full rejection, which this is. 4 staff (and it is 4 staff, DDM agreeing with a post where I vehemently reject everything in the OP is hard to construe as anything else) and numerous regular member disagreements versus the OP + 2 regular members isn't a debatable issue at all. The thread being Low 1-C doesn't really matter much here.

And finally, being blunt, every single staff member you mentioned can open and post any time they wish, and I won't begrudge them. But we don't keep threads open in perpetuity for that reason, even if this was accepted.
Your opinion would be appreciated.

Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
I really don't like spending half an hour going through mobile games about sentient cookies.

This wiki is an accursed place.
Ar1216789
Mr. Bambu
Question if a character who has resistance to electricity is hit by lightning and suffers no damage that feat can be considered as durability?
Ar1216789
Ar1216789
No.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Could be, could not be, although lightning itself is normally taken with an extreme grain of salt.

If you mean resistance in the sense of something like Bloodborne or Dungeons and Dragons, where the resistance is functionally a reduction of damage (normally by fairly small amounts), then yeah, to an extent. But if the character is simply broadly immune to electricity, for example, then no.

Our favorite word on this hellsite is context, and so I evoke it now. It's always important.
Apex_Predator_GX
Apex_Predator_GX
In this case the character is charged with electrical power.



Votes here please thanks
Hello, could you please evaluate this CRT? Thanks.
Hello, could you please evaluate this CRT? Thanks.



Can I have your vote on these matches?

Thanks
Heya! Would you mind checking this thread? Thank you!

Heya! Could you perhaps check this thread? Thank you!

Hello! How are you? Sorry to bother you again, but when you have a chance, could you please evaluate these two weightlifting calculations? (These are very simple calculations and I used other accepted calculations as a basis).

Welp, it seems it begins again.
Back
Top