• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Mind checking this thread?
Could you evaluate these, please?
Could you evaluate this please ?
Hello!

Can I please get approval and help with this?

Hey Ultima, I had some questions regarding implications of the New Tiering System and I was wondering if you could answer.
  1. When comparing two Verses in their totality, both of which have Tier 0s, can a comparison be made through the surrounding Characters (e.g. besides the 0s, Verse A has several High 1-A Characters, whereas Verse B only has a few 1-A Characters, so Verse A is superior", or is such a comparison absurd due to the existence of Tier 0s in both Verses?
  2. As I understand, the totality of all Logical Space and/or possible worlds in Modal Realism qualifies for High 1-A+ on the Tiering System. How would the Wiki approach Verses dealing with Extended Modal Realism, which denotes both possible and impossible worlds as equally real?
  3. This is more so for confirmation than anything, but would holding R>F over a 1-A Space qualify High 1-A or just deeper into 1-A? I'm assuming the former.
  • Like
Reactions: Huesito88
Ultima_Reality
Ultima_Reality
1. Yeah, I guess so. It's probably reasonable to exclude the Tier 0 when making casual comparisons like that. Else the two verses just end up equal.

2. Would still be High 1-A+

3. The latter, without more context.
MurphsParadox
MurphsParadox
3. Can you expand on this? Because as I understood it from the description, High 1-A exhibits qualitative superiority over 1-A, in which case, R>F (i.e. qualitative superiority) over one such Space should qualify for High 1-A, no? or am I misunderstanding High 1-A entirely?
Ultima_Reality
Ultima_Reality
Less "Qualitative superiority over 1-A" and more "Transcends qualitative superiority" itself. The idea is effectively that, just as everything from 11-C to Low 1-A shares of a single overarching attribute, which 1-A is superior to, so is High 1-A superior to the attribute defining a 1-A hierarchy (Or would-be hierarchy).
so, like if a character is unbounded by logic, would he scale to boundless??
Realabod
Realabod
because if a character isn't bounded by every possibility represented by high 1-A+ which is all logical possibilities existing then it's boundless so yeah go test your eyes sweetie
Gasper
Gasper
You do realize a simple statement of being "beyond logic" isn't enough for Tier 0, right? Tik Tok level thinking lmaoo
Realabod
Realabod
what tier are you in debates
It looks like Marvel will just forever stuck in H-1A and DC now just have one character confirmed to be tier0
Can you check out this match (it's on FCOC meaning it's a FC vs a official character)
Could you comment on that ID thread whenever you have some spare time? Thx!

Could you comment on that ID thread whenever you have some spare time? Thx!

Could you comment on that ID thread whenever you have some spare time? Thx!

Can you get your votes here please?
some input on this if possible would be nice.

Could you review it?

This time the images work fine.

Address the counterarguments to "Nullify the Ability" when what you are nullifying are the effects.

But it is named after Nullifies abilities and magic.

The issue is that his counterargument is that it nullifies the ability (what gives him his powers) itself, when it doesn't, if it were like that, just touching a barrier, mental control in one, regeneration in a wound, would nullify the ability, causing everything to cancel, but it doesn't happen that way.

Yuuki also needs the other side's ability to activate to know what to cancel, that is, he needs the other to activate regeneration, activate a shield, mental control, a little and touch it to know what to cancel it.

Shiraito983
Shiraito983
he is a calc member, he has no power on CRT unless it is calc stuff.
only thread mod and admin for crt
Eikichi_Sensei
Eikichi_Sensei
Ah, ok I didn't know that very well.
Could you review it?

This time the images work fine.

Address the counterarguments to "Nullify the Ability" when what you are nullifying are the effects.

But it is named after Nullifies abilities and magic.

The issue is that his counterargument is that it nullifies the ability (what gives him his powers) itself, when it doesn't, if it were like that, just touching a barrier, mental control in one, regeneration in a wound, would nullify the ability, causing everything to cancel, but it doesn't happen that way.

Yuuki also needs the other side's ability to activate to know what to cancel, that is, he needs the other to activate regeneration, activate a shield, mental control, a little and touch it to know what to cancel it.

Some questions about 1A r>f

let's say there are clear ontological differences between the world where world A is the higher one and world b is the fiction
if there's an Item from world A in world b. would that be an anti-feat?
Realabod
Realabod
not really, it really depends on how you argue it. so let's say if there is proof that the item is unmatchable by anything in world B, you can just argue that it's too powerful for world B, that anyone that use it becomes like a character from world A. but it really depends on how you argue it.
Ultima_Reality
Ultima_Reality
Not necessarily? I suppose it could also depend on how the item got there, but if the verse is very explicit on the total superiority of the higher layer over the lower layer, then, probably reasonable to think there's a rational explanation for that.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
you're testin' your luck, buddy
Tomfer
Tomfer
sad-emoji.gif
Back
Top