• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Hello. Your input would be appreciated.

Hello AKM sama. Sorry to disturb you but I have a friend of mine who wants to sign up to Vsbattle wiki forum and he did but his account got banned. I was with Antvasima but I was brought here. Idk if you could be of some assistance. Thanks.
Hello there, Ultima. My recent thread was closed even though there were only 3 administrators who accepted it (solely based on Planck69's reasoning which I had already refuted) while the other half of the staff were pretty much ambiguous/neutral towards my proposal. It's rejection was neither unambiguous nor unanimous. What do you think? Do you disagree with them?
Why'd you lock the thread? Only 3 staff members rejected it.
TyphonEX
TyphonEX
There was even a staff member (Catzlaflame) who was still reading the thread and didn't even evaluate it yet. Executor _N0 didn't even say anything one way or the other either. And DarkDragonMedeus only said "I suppose this makes sense" to one of Planck's arguments. To say that my proposal was "universally rejected by staff members" is extremely disingenuous.
Theglassman12
Theglassman12
4 staff members rejected it, that's more than enough to consider a rejection on this site, plus Executor's a calc member, not a thread mod or an admin so his votes wouldn't change anything.
Planck69
Planck69
There's also no real minimum rejection requirement, certainly not more than 4 of them. So long as no staff member agreed to it, it would be a unanimous rejection by definition.
Your opinion would be appreciated.

Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
I really don't like spending half an hour going through mobile games about sentient cookies.

This wiki is an accursed place.
Ar1216789
Mr. Bambu
Question if a character who has resistance to electricity is hit by lightning and suffers no damage that feat can be considered as durability?
Ar1216789
Ar1216789
No.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Could be, could not be, although lightning itself is normally taken with an extreme grain of salt.

If you mean resistance in the sense of something like Bloodborne or Dungeons and Dragons, where the resistance is functionally a reduction of damage (normally by fairly small amounts), then yeah, to an extent. But if the character is simply broadly immune to electricity, for example, then no.

Our favorite word on this hellsite is context, and so I evoke it now. It's always important.
Apex_Predator_GX
Apex_Predator_GX
In this case the character is charged with electrical power.



Votes here please thanks
Hello, could you please evaluate this CRT? Thanks.
Hello, could you please evaluate this CRT? Thanks.



Can I have your vote on these matches?

Thanks
Heya! Would you mind checking this thread? Thank you!

Heya! Could you perhaps check this thread? Thank you!

Hello! How are you? Sorry to bother you again, but when you have a chance, could you please evaluate these two weightlifting calculations? (These are very simple calculations and I used other accepted calculations as a basis).

Welp, it seems it begins again.
Hello. Can you check this thread pls
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
there's... too many... of you...
Renitr
Renitr
Of course when you have time
Renitr
Renitr
Just this thread has been without attention by the staff for a long time
Hello! If you have time, can you check this out?
Hi. If you have time can you check this calcs please. (about first calc the action takes place somewhere under the subway or in abandoned metro areas. So I think reinforced concrete should be okay)
  • Like
Reactions: TheRustyOne
Renitr
Renitr
Thank you very much for evaluating the calculations. I have some questions.
In the first calculation, can I use only V frag of concrete (not reinforced)? That is, can I use only wall level+ result? Two result of this calc can work?
Wassup! Since you're a Spawn supporters, I think you should take a look at this versus thread and maybe provide your opinion.
Dark-Carioca
Dark-Carioca
I'm not all that interested in versus matches generally tbh
AThe1412
AThe1412
Oh, that's alright. I just thought I should inform you about it. Apologies for bothering you if I did.
Dark-Carioca
Dark-Carioca
Nah it's fine, I'm just not really in the mood for it nowadays... plus I don't find the opponent too interesting either

There is no distinction between past, present, and future for Altana,for her all them are one , so she would not have linear time she would reside in a state where all events are always happening simultaneously and she is always present ,she would be an eternal now

Am i right would she be acausality type 5 and an eternal now?
Grabbing_dragon
Grabbing_dragon
I just need a yes or no past, present, and future are all the same to her and she is always present
Ultima_Reality
Grabbing_dragon
Grabbing_dragon
Ok thanks i guess it needs to get called eternal now
If you don't mind me discussing it here, what do you still disagree on in this post? I've shown that parallelism is completely unnecessary headcanon and that they haven't even proven that the RBR or by extension the Yggdrasil would extend in any significant extent along the 5th dimensional axis.
Hello, if you don't mind, could you check any of these two calcs when you have time? Thanks in advance
Dark-Carioca
Dark-Carioca
Left some comments
  • Like
Reactions: RoTt35
RoTt35
RoTt35
Thanks for your evaluation, the second method of the first calc shouldn't count as calc stacking, right? Since the yield of the shockwave that Jean tanked is what's being calculated
Dark-Carioca
Dark-Carioca
Yeah I was mostly referring to the first method, forgot to specify
  • Like
Reactions: RoTt35
Hi I made a blog post to hopefully make following a series much easier to follow and clear up misconceptions, any help would be much appreciated
You can also give the final vote of this one it’s still open

Back
Top