I will note, that I have been stressed. And I do apologize for the misunderstandings. And might have been too blunt, but there were still plenty of mis-characterizations of me. First of all, calling people rude, obnoxious, narrow-minded, or condescending isn't really insulting. It's constructive criticism. And I never once in the entire thread called you "Stupid". That would have been an example of an insult, but that's why I never said it. You're obviously not stupid, but I do strongly feel like there was some hypocrisy in that line because not once have I called you that and I know from experience the things you said to me offsite. As well as some obvious self fulfilling prophecies on your end. And perhaps "For your own good" was too blunt, but that's why I removed it. Maybe there was an implication when I said "I feel like I'm arguing with someone who's claiming 2 + 2 =/= 4", but that's more so an implication and not a direct statement. And more importantly, I was comparing your arguments to statements like that rather than you specifically. But rather, I was getting really annoyed to even debate regarding something that should be common sense. Narrow-minded isn't even close to meaning "Stupid". Narrow-Minded is more so a synonym of ignorant or someone with a self centered mind set. A person could be very intelligent and still be narrow-minded. So in other words, I never once directly insulted you on this thread or ever period. I simply called you out for your behavior and reasoning which is what I'm supposed to do if people are being are being rude or aggressive. And no, this isn't slander because I have legit seen you act rude a lot on many threads. Constructive criticism is simply giving honest feedback. And I was perfectly stating my own honest opinion when calling you those things.
Also, just because text wasn't in all caps doesn't mean people aren't yelling. Not everyone actually uses punctuation or all caps to express emotion and just do it with normal text. Profanity and usage of 3rd commandment breaks are typical signs of yelling at people. And mainly just words or snarky attitudes that are considered disrespectful and/or aggressive in general also qualify as yelling. But either way, regardless of whether not you consider it yelling, it was still a snarky attitude that no one appreciated.
And I'm not one to trigger that easily, but have personally experienced of things you said to me offsite. So I'm not relying on assumptions. But still, there is a constant persistency going on here and other places. And in fact, you're the one who's actually called me that insult word and other synonyms multiple times on multiple occasions. And given someone who used to be good friends with me, I expected much better behavior.
Anyway, google searching "Define possibility" gives me three definitions. One of which is
a course of action, thing, or person that is selected or decided upon. There is a synonym for
choice. And looking up "Choice" is also a synonym for selection. Selection process is literally just 2 or more choices. This is basically what the "
Many Worlds Interpretatio" theory regarding the existence of an alternate reality for each and every single choice there is to make, which is a big part of Xenosaga means. Is that for each and every choice, their is an alternate universe. Jungian theories are mentioned both in the guidebooks and in some of the games. That was what I needed to get out of the way. So I never understood what all these cherry picks left and right were all about. Also, the keyword still said "Selecting phenomena." So in other words, selections, choices, and possibilities all mean the same thing. I did double check my work, multiple times.
Okay then, but it's still a back up statement worth bringing up. If used by itself, then sure. I can see iffiness. But it's one of many statements that exist regarding infinite set of potential phenomena. And Florida actually shared another explanation for how phenomena equates to universes.
Well, it seems we finally agree they're the same multiverse. And it also doesn't change the fact that Malos was going to "Destroy all existence". And he does so using Artifice Aion, which is empowered by the Conduit.
- Both founded in Africa during the early 21st Century
- Both stated to be gifts from "Divine Entities"
- Both are Magnetic Abnormal Matters and Perpetual Motion Machines and Infinite energy engines
- Both are shaped like Golden Latin Crosses
- Both are Multiversal gateways or "Meta-Universe Manifolds"
- Both empower all mechs and robots in their respective universes.
- Both are controlled by a Trinity of Computers (The Trinity Processesor in Xenoblade's case and U.M.N in Xenosaga's case.
- Both are what empower the final bosses, Artifice Aion and Zarathustra with the ability to "Destroy all existence" and "Destroy God himself".
- Both ultimately draw power from a certain "Dimension" and said "Dimension" is more powerful than an infinite number of universes put together.
- To say it's just one random parallel Universe would imply that that one parallel universe is equal to any other. But the fact that that one just so happens to either be hidden away from those with 2-A levels of cosmic awareness actually requires far more assumptions then to just say it's the "Upper Domain" or at least the "Imaginary Numbers Domain" given they both exist.
- Imaginary Numbers Domain alone has "Above and beyond all time and space" as it's description to prove that alone is Low 1-C to quote Ultima Reality on another thread.
I did mention that I gave to the specific pages, and that said pages mentioning him falling to the 3rd dimension actually.
