- 2,783
- 1,689
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does not count due to being a puppet of bern and also being the embodiment of Rika's despair.Erika
The first antagonist in Higanbana, forgot his name.
This ovy^He said Umineko tho
Kyrie does love Rudolf.as actual Pure-Evil monsters can never love or feel remorse.
Kyrie
Could be villainous pragmatism as Featherine enjoys atrocities that Bernkastek or Erica Furudo comitt and also Lambadelta and as a result she is responsible for any atrocity they commit and also Beato as Lambadelta turned Beato in to a witch in the first place and Featherine genuinely had no sense of regret in these ventures whatsoever.I doubt Featherine'd count as pure evil, tbh.
She acts more as a true neutral character, since her only intention is to watch the story as the Witch of Theatergoing to deduce the secret of Rokkenjima by her own.
She also has shown some good actions that'd go against a pure evil nature, such as not publishing Eva's diary and consequently helping people to consider debating of the Rokkenjima accident as an insult to the victim and stop all the theories against Ange's family members.
Meanwhile:
Kyrie does love Rudolf.
Seems to be pragmatic as she corrupted him in the first place and she is greedy so money also might be a factor. She committed a mass act of terror that blew up an island and did it for money and murdered little kids like Maria and gloated about it openly.I doubt Featherine'd count as pure evil, tbh.
She acts more as a true neutral character, since her only intention is to watch the story as the Witch of Theatergoing to deduce the secret of Rokkenjima by her own.
She also has shown some good actions that'd go against a pure evil nature, such as not publishing Eva's diary and consequently helping people to consider debating of the Rokkenjima accident as an insult to the victim and stop all the theories against Ange's family members.
Meanwhile:
Kyrie does love Rudolf.
So, basically the same thing we do to ants, for example? I mean, the analogy here is that those who stand at the top of the food chain can do whatever the hell they want, so this should've been expected. Especially considering that witches most certainly don't view humans as anything special or somethingCould be villainous pragmatism as Featherine enjoys atrocities that Bernkastek or Erica Furudo comitt and also Lambadelta and as a result she is responsible for any atrocity they commit and also Beato as Lambadelta turned Beato in to a witch in the first place and Featherine genuinely had no sense of regret in these ventures whatsoever.
Only sadistic psychopaths enjoy inflicting pain on to sentient creatures lamo and Featherine goes out of her way to provoke Bern in to doing horrible acts for mere amusement. Also cosmic entities can be Pure Evil an example is Morgoth from LOTR.So, basically the same thing we do to ants? I mean, the analogy here is that those who stand at the top of the food chain can do whatever the hell they want, so this should've been expected. Especially considering that witches most certainly don't view humans as anything special or something
Y'know, I remember one moment in a Minecraft video (it was an LP with a story made by a whole team sponsored by a guy named Lololoshka) where an old man looked at a scientist from another world (that was technologically underdeveloped compared to the world an old man was from) and called him a "cute animal", so to say that to witches we humans will be "sentient" isn't really a good justification, but I digressOnly sadistic psychopaths enjoy inflicting pain on to sentient creatures lamo and Featherine goes out of her way to provoke Bern in to doing horrible acts for mere amusement. Also cosmic entities can be Pure Evil an example is Morgoth from LOTR.
Featherine enjoys mysteries, not "atrocities". She enjoys intelectual stories that can take away her boredom and revive her.Could be villainous pragmatism as Featherine enjoys atrocities that Bernkastek or Erica Furudo comitt
Saying Lambda is true evil but Bern isn't is just wrong. Both were playing roles on the story.and also Lambadelta and as a result she is responsible for any atrocity they commit and also Beato as Lambadelta turned Beato in to a witch in the first place and Featherine genuinely had no sense of regret in these ventures whatsoever.
Lambdadelta and Bernkastel were, indirectly, helpers of Beatrice to let Battler learn the truth of the Rokkenjima incident.Only sadistic psychopaths enjoy inflicting pain on to sentient creatures lamo
Bernkastel is the one who acts on her own to revive her master, even if their relationship seems bad.and Featherine goes out of her way to provoke Bern in to doing horrible acts for mere amusement.
I never said lamba was PE I said that Featherine similar to Don Eladio from Breaking Bad is responsible for every terrible act all the villains do and Bern does not qualify due to lacking agency and free will as a result of her being the embodiment of Rikas inner evil aka she is evil by nature and cannot change herself to do good acts.Featherine enjoys mysteries, not "atrocities". She enjoys intelectual stories that can take away her boredom and revive her.
Pretty sure Featherine has not done any act out of pure evilness. Her only interventions with the plot were when she took Ange as a miko to read the story for her, when she took the book of Truth to learn the truth of Featherine's gameboard (though she posteriously didn't show it), and the only times she "attacked" was because she was attacked first.
A true evil person would not do any of that things. Let alone put a rose to let the story rest in the Sea of Oblivion when everything was done, not intervene even when her miko and guardians got defeated to let the story progress, help Battler recover in the Human World and then let him meet Ange, etc.
Saying Lambda is true evil but Bern isn't is just wrong. Both were playing roles on the story.
Saying Lambda has no morals when in the episode 8 she literally helped the protagonist because they'd give her the "best happy ending she could imagine", risking her life due to attacking the strongest witch of the Senate is just wrong.
Not to mention that the original cause of all the suffering of Ange was Bernkastel, who promised her the only way for her to find a member of her family was not to love Eva, which caused her meta-world death in episode 4, and almost the destruction of the gameboard where all her family was living in episode 8. Not to mention the suffering Eva had due to not being loved that ended up making her crazy
Did you miss the part where I said Bern lacks true moral agency due to only being made of evil and not having the choice for good deeds due to her nature being hardwired for evil? Featherine turned Rika in to Bern to begin with so that point is moot.But she isn't.
Unless you wanna use the argument that all narrative is written by her. In which case, all good things also are made by her, so she ain't pure evil
Also, being the personification of inner evil of someone does not discredit you being pure evil. If anything, it'd support it
She only keeps Lamba around as a sadistic chew toy to mess around with due to her inherent makeup she can never love or anything and is a sentient organic AI pretty much in this case.If Bernkastel couldn't do anything but bad actions actions, she wouldn't expect to get a role different of that of the bad guy in a different story.
Not to mention that her attaching Lambda's arms and legs to her body shows she can, indeed, have some benevolence.
At this point I'm starting to think that you haven't read UminekoShe only keeps Lamba around as a sadistic chew toy to mess around with due to her inherent makeup she can never love or anything and is a sentient organic AI pretty much in this case.
I have but you seem adamant on treating Bern as a normal person with moral agency when she is not and your insisting on defending Peychopaths like Featherine.
Have you actually read what I sent you? Literally 3 different examples of Bernkastel having emotions I remembered right after reading your comment. Now tell me how this:I have but you
Makes sense if you actually have.She only keeps Lamba around as a sadistic chew toy to mess around with due to her inherent makeup she can never love or anything and is a sentient organic AI pretty much in this case.
I'm not defending Featherine. I'm saying you can't hold your bias to Bernkastel saying she's not a bad witch and "that she only does bad things because she cannot do anything else", even saying she is a machine without emotions (when she's not) while critisizing other witches.seem adamant on treating Bern as a normal person with moral agency when she is not and your insisting on defending Peychopaths like Featherine.
At some point in time I had been simping on Bern, and even then will I not say she's "not a bad witch"hold your bias to Bernkastel saying she's not a bad witch
The meaning of redirecting (or diverted in other translation) is quite straightforward to be referred to what she did in that scene of anime version. That scene also got a remake in Gou and Satokowashi is a sequel from that scene.I'm not knowledgeable enough in higurashi since I watched the original anime long, long ago and I'm leaving the VN aside for now. But, how would that prove Sotsu not being Canon? That scene most likely refers to when Hanyuu used her power to prevent a bullet to kill the protagonists
And given that Ryukishi07 said that Gou and Sotsu are "culminations of Higurashi" to him, I doubt he'd consider them noncanon.
A sequel from non-canon = non-canonYeah, but I don't get how that'd prove that Sotsu is Non-Canon
Ok, I misunderstood the definition of Canon. Both are canon because they were supervised by R07 but Sotsu is no different from "What if story" because it didn't happen in the main storyline (VN) like many fan service chaptersRyukishi's on supervision of the plot of every adaptation of his work, from manga to anime, and often make changes that did not appear in the original work.
The most obvious example of this is the 8th episode of Umineko, which, even if entirely different to its VN counterpart, still is Canon and "an answer written directly by him".
The canonicity of its work is not limited to the visual novels, but to most the media of his works
I just used the word "what if" to make it has lower priority than the main storyline because it can't fit to the main storyline. (I don't know how to call this type of work, spin-off??)I wouldn't call it a what if story.
Just a continuation of the events of the anime, which'd be canon due to Ryukishi07 being in constant supervision, not only of the original anime, but also of Gou and Sotsu, and directly admiting that all of the media, be it anime, manga or vn serve to enter and understand the world of Higurashi/Umineko, and has added references that both the ones who watched the original anime and those who read the VN would understand and enjoy
If anime and manga were not canon, "what if stories with no relevance to the plot", he wouldn't state that.
Some character in Nasuverse has a separate key/profile for that so WTC should be the same (??)All in all, they are different formats telling the same story. Canon, of course, for the reasons above. Such as how in other VN originated series like Nasuverse the canon is not limited to the original VNs, but also includes the anime, manga or light novel version of said works. Even if the events in some of them are different
I would like to help but i dont know how to edit profiles and you probably already have every scan i have lolIs anyone here working on revising the characters' abilities?
Edit: Lmao, just checked it and since this thread is dead af it seems weird me being the only one constantly talking and getting no response