• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

What You Can't See Will Kill You (Ennard vs. Weeping Angel) (Voting Completed)

Joaco0902 said:
Actually, no, I just realized that the score is now 5-0-7, with five votes still for the Weeping Angel. Therefore, we NOW need one more vote, so there is a three vote differential, in order for this to fall into grace.
 
Wouldn't it be inconclusive then? I thought after it hits 7 votes. If it end without a 3 vote difference, it goes into inconclusive.
 
...No? When there's less then a 3 vote difference, then the debate continues until a 3 vote difference is reached.

It's only when a debate goes on for a long time with supporters from either side not being able to definitively conclude the debate that it is deemed Inconclusive without the 3 vote limit.
 
I mean, since Yakushimi changed his vote, you'd have to get two people in here to vote for the Angel to stall it again, so...

Good luck! ;-P
 
I mean, if it wasn't for the stream of Inconclusive votes, I'd have maintained my firm standpoint of the Weeping Angel winning against Ennard, but I decided to just not care and thus, I changed my vote to Inconclusive.
 
XXJellys vote doesn't count. They only said inconclusive. They didn't have any reasons or FRA shoved it. Dab
 
I could say "ignorance of the lawl is not an excuse", but that would make it seem like I haven't got over Daddy Derek's profile getting nuked, which I've obviously have.
 
Back
Top