I've literally already addressed the "backwards scaling" to SMB2 point, and you clearly didn't read my reply.
You didn't, you just said it's okay and moved on. We are not moving on.
The evidence for it literally doesn't even come from Dream Team, ******, it comes from Mario Party 5,
Irrelevant either. Backwards scaling all the same.
Also no need for swearing.
I literally showed evidence of it from Super Mario Advance, which is Wart's latest relevant appearance and the actual game that I'm "backwards scaling" it to, released one year before Mario Party 5.
Irrelevant as well. It's just a remake of Mario 2. It's the same game with shinier graphics. Not a new installment.
Interesting how you believe the evidence to be shakey when you don't even know the game it comes from.
I know. Super Mario Bros 2. From 1988.
Anyways, this is a derail, make a content revision thread about it if you're gonna contest it.
You're not trying to prove a positive, ergo I take it as a concession that you can't actually prove it and would rather just stonewall. If there is no evidence that Dream Worlds are universes I won't consider them as such.
As for the point about "seven in-game worlds", I used that as a statement where people were arguing the Subcon was just a single world based on a naming fallacy
So you ADMIT it? One post ago you just said that you didn't use those scans to argue that Subcon is more than one universe, but now you're admitting that you did! You can't stay consistent for two consecutive posts.
I literally clarified that, and I never used that as evidence it was a multiverse,
You literally just said you used it to "clarify" that Subcon is more than one world. Don't be dishonest. You contradicted yourself literally one phrase ago. Jesus.
so please clearly read the reply, the scans, and re-interpret them because you're misconstruing my points over and over.
I did. Your points make absolutely no sense and would never be valid ground for any upgrade.
My evidence was that it is a world made of multiple dream worlds, which each should individually be universes.
Without evidence for why they're universes that is all worthless. Subcon as presented in Super Mario Bros 2 is one world where all dreams happen.
We do use Nintendo Power guides for Nintendo games.
Maybe the Nintendo Games that you and Weeb like because I never seen it be accepted for Zelda and other games. Similar third party material is actually not accepted for other series either so I don't understand what kind of logic this is.
We shouldn't use American Material for Japanese-made games. With Super Mario 2 being an US game it means the US Manual is fine but Nintendo Power is something else entirely. Staff weren't in favor of using it last thread so why would we be in favor now?
Last paragraph you made is unsubstantiated head canon, an interpretation completely contradictory to the evidence that I presented. Back up your claims or don't make 'em.
You presented no evidence beyond a screenshot that says Mouser throws bombs. Looking at the bombs in-game and also statements from other manuals it is absolutely clear that he does not blow up any dream cosmological structure, that is YOUR headcanon because you want Mario to be as strong as possible. Nobody who is reasonable would read that and come to that conclusion.
Mouser does not destroy anything with his bombs. Not literally.
I cropped the scans because sometimes it's illegal to just drop full pages of things like that
We use full pages of guides, books and manga all the time. This reasoning is absolutely fake and gay. YOu just don't want to present full context behind things.
It also lets me clearly focus on what I'm trying to detail
It lets your ignore and cherry pick context as much as possible, that's what it does. If you were confident in the information sustaining itself you'd present pages in full.
The main reason I didn't source all of them is because over half the people on this thread actually can tell they come from the manuals whereas some people seem to not know basic Mario lore. I suppose I should've been more courteous to the latter, but I'm really only trying to prove it to the former.
And this is your problem. You are only concerned with keeping yourself on the echo-chamber and not at all open to opposition. This is why the evidence presented in this thread is so flimsy, even worse than the last thread, because the only people who think it's valid are the people who already started in the position of "Mario is Low 2-C / 2-C / 2-B / 1-A" to begin with.