Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Monarch Laciel said:Which amusingly should have got him hit by the ministry
This.Wokistan said:https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2036222#197
So, Weekly is arguing that this match is a stomp, which others on this thread don't agree with. I personally don't think it is, but I don't really care enough about these characters to argue that further and I don't think anyone in that thread as of now can truly claim to be speaking from an unbiased perspective. Due to this, I have posted this here to get a fresh set of eyes to evaluate.
Note: Do not have long arguments and discussions on this thread. If you are going to do so, argue on that thread. The extent of your opinionating here should be a simple agreement or disagreement, which mods can decide what to do with.
ThisStanduser081 said:
I don't know exactly what this "Where?" is for, but to further expand on the reasoning behind this answer just in case anyone is wondering...Nedge1000 said:Where?Wokistan said:High 1-B/1-A was debunked, but as the Materium itself still has a number of higher dimensions greater than the ability of human language to express, so regular 1-B is still correct. Khorne definitely has the range for that sort of stuff, and can also just negate anything that tries to affect Kharn itself rather than the source of need be.
Shouldn't Giorno's protection just be removed, seeing as he's no longer Tier 2, and doesn't have a history of vandalism from what I remember?Standuser081 said:ThisStanduser081 said:
Spite that ended in an in an inconc?Dargoo Faust said:Uh, so, I believe this is a spite thread/stomp, and should be removed. IDK if we should also report this on the violations thread.
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2013359
The OP put a character into a passive EE range for another character after it seemed like the character in question was going to lose.
So you are actually arguing the match would be more "fair" if the range wasn't that?RebubleUselet said:Spite threads can go wrong, too.
And considering your replies on said thread, I believe you changed the range to give Sirzechs a win, not to make a match fair.
I made it to make a fair fight. The fight was fair. It was fair by the rules. I don't see any problem with that fight.RebubleUselet said:No. What kind of logic is that? I'm saying that you changed the range to give your favourite character a win.
Still doesn't make the match unfair or make it ok to remove it. I mean if we gon remove that then let's remove all his loses and most of Medaka's loses, cus they were made out of spite to increase loss count.Dziga said:That's an obvious spite thread. OP clearly demonstrates bias for Sirzechs multiple times on the thread and made a change that is questionable at best. Should be removed.