• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Versus Thread Removal Requests 9

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Ricsi

It's part of the rule though?

Argument involving a versus thread to be removed that you don't agree with is allowed. Just be sensible about it.
 
Monarch Laciel said:
Powers being sealed is a type of power nullification, which gil resists.
You're literally the only person who thinks otherwise, that should tell you something.
Not all types of power null are the same.

Reisting EE doesn't = resisting matter manip, just cus yeah "types".

Resisting destruction doesn't = resisting Matter manip cus "types"

The types really matter cus they explain what happens, rather than the solution. By that logic

Conceptual EE and Hakkai are the same. Goku resists Conceptual EE since he resisted hakkai and all types of erasure are the same and 1 resistance is applicable to all the types cus why the hell not? They both do the same since you don't exist after that, so yeah. Though when we count in the fact that the former is on a conceptual level and is achieved via reality warping rather than destruction, resistances change.
 
Ricsi-viragosi said:
If you want to argue it, please do it on your walls.
You are filling the thread for no reason.

And are going in circles too. It's not a rule, but it makes everything easier.
 
@Ricsi-viragosi, we didn't mean to clog this thread; we will be more sensible about it.
 
From the previous thread:

GyroNutz Kharn was already 2,600x stronger than Lavos when the thread was made

Then wouldn't that make it even more of a stomp since there's absolutely nothing Lavos can do to counter that gap with all of his hax nulled? Plus, I believe the match was fair because it was assumed that Lavos had a way around Kharn's ap advantage, which he clearly doesn't.
 
Lavos can planet bust just fine, which causes issues for Kharn.
 
Wokistan said:
Lavos can planet bust just fine, which causes issues for Kharn.
Speaking of that. Kharn's power null never had the range to affect an infinite timeline and therefore could never put Lavos down for good.
 
did they too many Sans matches a 8-C in Threads.

need stop Sans matches Thread having massive Notable Losses count 12.

Yes that Downplayed/Wanked Sans now.
 
Speaking of that. Kharn's power null never had the range to affect an infinite timeline and therefore could never put Lavos down for good.

Despite coming from a High 1-B?
 
To be blunt I understood like 20% of what you said.

@Wright Coming from a High 1-B =/= infinite range or even High 1-B potency. Y'all gotta stop treating higher-D hax as an end of it all kind of hax.
 
@Gargoyle oh yeah, that's also outdated.

Guts vs Seras and Guts vs Goku should also be removed. The first is outdated since it was back when Guts was a glass cannon, but not anymore. Also the fact that he scales from a feat more than 3X stronger than what Seras scales to makes the whole argument of her faceplanting guts moot. The same applies to Goku's match considering he now scales from baseline, and Guts is very close to oneshotting him while goku has nothing to combat that.
 
Kharn's power null doesn't need to reach infinite timelines to beat Lavos anyway.

Kharn kills the Lavos in front of himself, a dupe from another timeline/point in time tries to snipe, Khorne negates it because that's what he does when someone tries to snipe Kharn.

Thus incap because Lavos is stuck in a different universe doing nothing.

Also pretty sure that Khorne's influence in the Materium is 1-B, so he has the range and the potency required
 
Pretty sure that Kharn's power null having 1-B potency was debunked.

Also Kharn can't just null a Lavos who tries to snipe if his PN has never shown that range. Again, Higher Dimensional source does not make your powers the best in everything. Still need feats.
 
High 1-B/1-A was debunked, but as the Materium itself still has a number of higher dimensions greater than the ability of human language to express, so regular 1-B is still correct. Khorne definitely has the range for that sort of stuff, and can also just negate anything that tries to affect Kharn itself rather than the source of need be.
 
Wokistan said:
High 1-B/1-A was debunked, but as the Materium itself still has a number of higher dimensions greater than the ability of human language to express, so regular 1-B is still correct. Khorne definitely has the range for that sort of stuff, and can also just negate anything that tries to affect Kharn itself rather than the source of need be.
Where?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top