- 3,451
- 1,071
I don't think so but as far as i saw, the general stand is 'if we don't have at least solid indication of it in more than one instance, we consider they can't do it'.Schnee One said:I don't see why it would be fallacious at all.
In fact I wanted to make a thread on this a while ago, because there's zero rule that we assume that because a person's actions are contradicted, we assume it's the best course
Is there a rule for this?
Honestly i don't really have an opinion either way on that, i was just following the general mindset i'v seen on that subject.