- 20,509
- 1,590
I agree with Agnaa on the Scar Dead issue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The mental damage part of Gagamaru would of course be negating durability as well, yes.I feel like Shibuki's profile would still need rewording, as it currently implies the wound re-opening negates durability. Also, shouldn't Gagamaru technically get something similar, as he's able to push away mental damage to others?
I guess I can accept "opposite of healing process" as an indication of a mechanism for Scar Dead. (reverse regeneration that is)However, in finding that scan, I found this one, where it describes Scar Dead as:
I feel like those last two descriptions sound more like something that would negate durability, while the first one could go either way.
- Forcefully reopening old wounds.
- The opposite of the healing process.
- Like an extreme version of your old wounds aching when it rains.
Does this change your outlook on it, @DontTalkDT ?
With the notable functional change that Kakegae could fight with 639,999 copies of herself, and 1 copy of her opponent (or 1 copy of Iihiko/Medaka/Nanami).She has never demonstrated combining Eight Hundred Lies and Metonymy in any on-screen parts of her battles. The fact that her clones produced by Eight Hundred Lies can use the style themself might suggest that they are able to use her styles, though. The secondary clones have not demonstrated this ability.
That is true although have to make a distinction between "can" and "will" (not in character). But that is my stance correct.And I think they might want it assumed that Kakegae can summon any amount of clones, over 640k at once.
Okay.DT and Earl to collaborate on how the wording for Encounter & Metonymy should be changed.
As Agnaa suggested I would not include the causality manip part, but just explain in a note that the mechanism is very unclear and hence it could potentially be resisted by various things. Then name a bunch of resistances those might be (causality manip, reality warping, damage reflection, matter manipulation etc.)Resistable? You mean "could be resisted through causality manip" kind of stuff?
And where do you think this list should be on the P&A or in the notes section? In the P&A i guess i could do sth like this:
"Possibly Durability Negation via Causality Manipulation"
Btw what conclusion did we reach on the defensive part of Encounter (the healing or rejection part)? That too a "possibly"?
Earl is iffy about the last line, and would suggest this addition:She has never demonstrated combining Eight Hundred Lies and Metonymy in any on-screen parts of her battles. The fact that her clones produced by Eight Hundred Lies can use the style themself might suggest that they are able to use her styles, though. The secondary clones have not demonstrated this ability.
She has never demonstrated combining Eight Hundred Lies and Metonymy in any on-screen parts of her battles. The fact that her clones produced by Eight Hundred Lies can use the style themself might suggest that they are able to use her styles, though. The secondary clones have not demonstrated this ability, so it is possible they aren't capable of using either style.
If Encounter is taken to negate durability, the mechanism by which it does so is unknown, meaning that it could be nullified by a variety of Resistances, such as Causality Manipulation, Reality Warping, Damage Reflection, Matter Manipulation, and possibly more.