• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Two of my minor gripes with the tiering system

Status
Not open for further replies.

KingPin0422

Derp Idol
Joke Battles
Retired
1,280
1,120
First of all, why is 9-C labeled "Street level"? Does that imply that characters of that tier can bust a street? Because I think a street is pretty ******* big compared to a wall, or even a room. It should be named "Peak Human level" to fit with the other stats.

Secondly, I think that "Large Planet level" should become High 5-B and "Dwarf Star level" can take over 5-A. Not only would it be more consistent with the rest of the tiering system, but I also think it would look better.
 
Street level is a staple that comes from Marvel. We're not changing such a large tier with an easily recognizable name.
 
Matthew Schroeder said:
Street level is a staple that comes from Marvel. We're not changing such a large tier with an easily recognizable name.
Actually have had literal Multiple friends wonder what the hell jacksparrow was that high for as street is misleading.
 
Street level ''is'' misleading but it's a commonly used term in versus debating communities and renaming the tier would take a lot of work for something that is certainly not worth it.
 
"Street level" refers to the term "street fighter". Someone who can comfortably hold their own in a street brawl.

Can't say I agree with your proposed renaming for Large Planet level and such.
 
You only need to look at the tiering system page to understand what Street level is. You just have to not be lazy.
 
The Everlasting said:
>"Minor gripes"
>Suggesting we rename multiple very large tiers
Exactly. I'm suggesting to rename one tier and reorder two others. Nothing much, really.

As for the rest of you... I'm pretty sure that 10-As can comfortably be described as street fighters, so that argument doesn't work.

By the way, the fact that you acknowledge that "Street level" is misleading yet refuse to fix it because "it's common in other VS debating sites" not only gives off the impression that we're being reliant on those sites, but it also tells me that you staff members are becoming lazy.
 
This is more than a simple rename. You are asking for another wiki wide revision. It's more work than you think. Work that is not worth it in the long run
 
Contrary to what has been done in the past regarding the change of Striking Strength, as opposed to virtually the entire wikia in the changing of its definition. It is arguably less than whats presented at the moment since this only includes a sect of profiles and not a majority of the pages that are at hand.
 
KingPin0422 said:
By the way, the fact that you acknowledge that "Street level" is misleading yet refuse to fix it because "it's common in other VS debating sites" not only gives off the impression that we're being reliant on those sites, but it also tells me that you staff members are becoming lazy.
It's a term that most people understand, so we have no reason to change it.

Also, your definition of us "being lazy" is "don't want to change a large fraction of the profiles based on your demands". Tier 9 is our largest tier category, and changing its name is not only absurdly tedious but not necessary.
 
The Tiering System isn't going to change here, period. Trying to change it to any degree further than clarifications, explanations, or the like will likely just result in administrator annoyance, warnings, and bans.
 
Since the opinions are universally against this measure, I think I can close this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top