- 168,514
- 77,231
So should we go with Mid-Godly after all?It would have to actually destroy mind-body-soul, but otherwise yes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So should we go with Mid-Godly after all?It would have to actually destroy mind-body-soul, but otherwise yes.
Yes, but the wording I was given implied it did an incomplete job, hence my clarification. If it doesn't destroy all of those things, then regenerating from it isn't a Mid-Godly feat.It erases every thing from cells to soul to existence and information.
It didn't do an incomplete job. It wasn't used on him he was only implied/stated to be able regenerate from the attack.Yes, but the wording I was given implied it did an incomplete job, hence my clarification. If it doesn't destroy all of those things, then regenerating from it isn't a Mid-Godly feat.
Wdym "he was only implied/stated to regenerate from the attack"It didn't do an incomplete job. It wasn't used on him he was only implied/stated to regenerate from the attack.
Have mentioned this multiple times he wasn't Hit by the attack he blocked it with is skill. And it was stated even if he got hit by the attack he could still regenerate back from it. Sry for the inconveniences.Wdym "he was only implied/stated to regenerate from the attack"
I literally just gave the summary of the feat that was being discussed. I don't know what else you would want me to do.This thread is turning really annoying. Can we all try to collaborate to figure out an accurate solution and then apply it please, instead of drowning the staff in more and more posts?
Okay. Sorry about that. I was speaking in general.I literally just gave the summary of the feat that was being discussed. I don't know what else you would want me to do.
I also already said that I originally considered the feat to be Low-Godly to be safe. But based on the second sentence of my summary, people are arguing it could be Mid-Godly.
That's as concise as it can possibly be. You can't possibly drown in it.
Until we see it being something that makes up concepts and world laws like in the WN, then no it doesn't satisfy the requirements for High-Godly as it seems to not be literal information either.
If there are scattered evidences in future volumes, I'd rather we wait for more Tensura Fan translations first.
Anyway, is this fine now?Well, first the changes need to be applied, and then we can close this thread.
Is somebody here willing to apply them?
I'll do it.Okay. So is somebody willing to apply that then?
Juz LNits both LN and WN or just to LN?
Not necessary, I can access the affected profiles.Do I need to unlock any profile pages?
Also, bear in mind that the explanations for the regeneration statistics need to be updated as well.
It's already done. Two profiles are affected, Rimuru and Diablo.Thank you, but the justification texts need to be updated before I can close this thread.
To this:
Diablo's justification was changed from this:
To this(High-Godly, Guy thinks Diablo could quickly revive if destroyed; destroying someone completely also include the destruction of information which make up everything in existence)
If you have scans about it being "the most fundamental thing in the verse" I would be happy to see it. Currently there isn't any.Atleast can you answer Elizhaa's question before adding things? I don't see any real arguments against high-godly aside from "it maybe not a literal information" well we also don't know if its not an information either, what we know is that make up everything and the most fundamental thing in the verse (so far). Also i recall Raphael is stated as conceptual intelligence.
Done.You forgot Yuuki regeneration-negation
All thing we know that it was what made up everything wether it also made concepts or not its still unknown but for sure its described as something that made everything and even its called information particles if it not a literal information then i don't know what it is.If you have scans about it being "the most fundamental thing in the verse" I would be happy to see it. Currently there isn't any.
Information particles being literal information is not conclusive yet since it's being treated like a metaphysical object that's reallly small and makes up everything. It is described to make up skills but not literal concepts or laws, unlike the WN.
Read my comment again.Why you didn't answer Elizhaa's question?
so being called information particles and described as something fundamental that makes up everything is not enough to be considered as real information huh...
If you have scans about it being "the most fundamental thing in the verse" I would be happy to see it. Currently there isn't any.
Is this the answer? What?You're speaking under the preemptive assumption that we would naturally assume that something called an information particle would be literal information. That's not how it works, your interpretation is just one thing, it's not absolute and doesn't mean it's correct
Please Explain why being described as smallest unit, made up everything, and even outright called information particles does not equal to a literal information and why it's required to made up concepts as well to be treated as literal information?Sorry, I have kind of got busy with class assignments/exams earlier and this thread was buried by my notifications.
It sounds like you required information on the concepts themselves which seem a bit extreme; by this logic, it might as well be a conceptual basis of existence.
I am not seeing why it is not literal information?
Qliphoth Bacikal's translation added more evidence to this point.