• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Top 5 Weakest Characters Per Every Tier: The Revival

Don't put him on there without confirmation, but Enzo (Mothlight)'s first key or a similar character will probably take it for the weakest 3-A. The reason I'm not sure if Enzo would actually be is because he has his luck (which can let him move first against far fast opponents) and some durability negations, so if its not him it may be someone similar but without the hax
 
I also think Zombie (Minecraft) should be the second weakest 8-C, just below Creeper for similar reasons as why Creeper is the weakest. The only difference is that the Zombie doesn't have to kill themselves to harm their opponent.
 
Prep Time Robbie has a remote that can stop people in time and a device that can de-age people. No matter how incompetent he is, Robbie has to be able to beat at least four characters with that.
 
It's a miracle Gogeta is 2-C given how ridiculously controvertial that upgrade was.

The downplay of Gogeta was sickening, he should be 2B.
 
Why? Nothing in canon Dragon Ball is even close to 2-B, or do you forget there are only 12 universes?
 
Maybe like many, many years ago, but ever since I joined this wiki on early 2018, he has been 2-B.
 
You obviously misunderstood the distinction. Going from Low-Multi to Multi isn't a tier change, it is levels within a tier.

Low 2-C to 2-C is actually a much bigger jump than 10-B to 3-A, simply because of how extremely huge the difference between Low 2-C and 2-C is.
 
Low 2C to 2C is a big difference because it's a big difference. I didnt oppose that stance. That logic is oddly circular.
 
Mulgara said:
You obviously misunderstood the distinction. Going from Low-Multi to Multi isn't a tier change, it is levels within a tier.
Click to expand...
Mulgara said:
Low 2C to 2C is a big difference because it's a big difference. I didnt oppose that stance. That logic is oddly circular.
Click to expand...
We can't quantify the distance between timelines in a multiverse, so we cannot say how much more energy is needed to destroy 1500 than is needed to destroy 15. So to play it safe we just count the number actually affected canonically, and hence, we don't use multipliers.
 
The distance between a timelines/universes is some quadrillion light years, so that equate MTFL+ in a scale, them being seperate and not connected does not change the distance. If they are shown feats that scale above and laterally state it they are, you don't need to measure the distance.

Screenshot 2020-02-26-21-42-23
You just have to be measure the joules to destroy a universe or space - time continuum and then amplify by 15 or 1500, which is substanted by this scan, but just not mentioned.
 
The distance between a timelines/universes is some billion light years

[citation needed]

Also, this tells us nothing about their arrangement. Are they packed together like balls in a box? Are they lined up in a row? Are they lined up in a grid? Are they scattered like stars in the sky? All of these factors matter and are unknowable.

If they are shown feats that scale above and laterally state it they are, you don't need to measure the distance.

But if we don't know how much scaling above is required to reach the next tier, then we do need to measure the distance, because we can't say what multipliers will work and what multipliers won't.

You just have to be measure the joules to destroy a universe or space - time continuum

Joule values don't apply once you reach High 3-A. There is no joule value for destroying an infinite space, or a 4-D timeline.
 
Anyways, why would there be a physical distance between timelines...

Why are you suggesting that because only 4 existed canonically, that only 4 could actually be destroyed, therefore they cannot be multiversal. That's shitty reasoning.
 
If there's no physical distance between timelines then they literally exist in the same position, and destroying 1 trillion timelines would be no different from destroying 1.

I'm stating that they've only shown to destroy 4, so we cannot say that they destroyed more than 4.
 
Yes, so the feat is 2C since you need to destoy 2 - 1000 space - time continnua to reach that level of universes, not a new tier which you are not opposing.
 
Sorry dude I don't understand what you're trying to say there.
 
Agnaa said:
Sorry dude I don't understand what you're trying to say there.
Click to expand...
Of course, because your logic is flawed. There being tweleve universes canonically does not equate that they cannot destroy more than 12, thats a accossiation fallacy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Arkenis
Top 10 Strongest Non-Smurf Based on Skill
Replies
14
Views
2K
EL_xWatcher1234x
EL_xWatcher1234x
Arkenis
Top 10 New-Gen Non-Smurf Strongest
2 3
Replies
85
Views
4K
Nicetoderp
Nicetoderp
TWILIGHT-OP
TOP 10 WEAKEST CHARACTER FOR EVERY TIER
Replies
37
Views
4K
Spilxson2
Setsuna_tenma
Top 15 Strongest Characters for Every Tier
13 14 15
Replies
582
Views
46K
XDragnoir
XDragnoir
Arkenis
Top Ten Enhanced Senses, ESP, Precognition For Every Tier
Replies
31
Views
4K
Sonoftanavast9
Sonoftanavast9
Back
Top