- 8,845
- 9,506
- Thread starter
- #241
I asked the same thing off site but I was told large human bodies don’t warrant GBE.Honestly, wouldn't Chakra's own size warrant 3-A through GBE?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I asked the same thing off site but I was told large human bodies don’t warrant GBE.Honestly, wouldn't Chakra's own size warrant 3-A through GBE?
Why would it be an outlier when it’s from Asura's strongest enemy?I don't really see why we would use a single inconsistent moon for a tier waaay above anything else in the game.
Wouldn't it be one of those cases when outlier actually matters?
Because outliers aren't just that? None of Chakravartin or Asura's feats are anywhere near that in both plot and gameplay; and the only way to apparently get this tier is by calcing an inconsistent moon.Why would it be an outlier when it’s from Asura's strongest enemy?
I swear there's this warped perception on what outliers are. This isn’t even an argument, it's stone walling. A feat is too high for your liking so you automatically call it an outlier.Because outliers aren't just that? None of Chakravartin or Asura's feats are anywhere near that in both plot and gameplay; and the only way to apparently get this tier is by calcing an inconsistent moon.
We explained multiple times why the moon has to be scaled down for memory. Please don’t argue from willful ignorance.Mb if I missed something, but I really don't see why one would try to calc too hard smth which is a lot of trouble rather than rely on consistency.
You seem pretty agressive about this. It's just a game, yknow?I swear there's this warped perception on what outliers are. This isn’t even an argument, it's stone walling. A feat is too high for your liking so you automatically call it an outlier.
We explained multiple times why the moon has to be scaled down for memory. Please don’t argue from willful ignorance.
Getting a massive boost in AP by a feat isnt a outlier you know???You seem pretty agressive about this. It's just a game, yknow?
I'm just raising legit concern over everything I've read so far. This "memory" argument really seems dishonest to me, and so far I just see the exact opposite, which is to just have a high feat because it's high.
Not just memory it's literally about inherent game design, budget, memory and etc. And assuming it's dishonest just fit your arguement is literally ignoring valid points about the impossible things you're asking to have happen in the game that being having models to scale and be billions and trillions to times larger, being fully rendered, animated, and optimized something that's not even possible today with the best engines. So the only dishonest part is ignoring the technical limitations to plague the size inconsistencies that have been explained and do so in a way that ignores everything about how it works in a technical and common sense.This "memory" argument really seems dishonest to me,
This also seems kinda patronizing to him and it's not a proper agruement to his point in general as Zamasu brings up a valid point. So far you've just said it's an outlier, is inconsistent, and essentially dishonest to assume games have technical and budget limitations. Soo yeah hopefully I didn't sound rude that's just all I have to say about what you've said so far. I'll pop back out of the discussion though to see where things goYou seem pretty agressive about this. It's just a game, yknow?
But, like, you genuinely couldn't render a model that big. It's just not possible.This "memory" argument really seems dishonest to me
Except we don't use technical limitations as a reason to ignore what is being portrayed. I don't see why this specific game should be an exception.Not just memory it's literally about inherent game design, budget, memory and etc. And assuming it's dishonest just fit your arguement is literally ignoring valid points about the impossible things you're asking to have happen in the game that being having models to scale and be billions and trillions to times larger, being fully rendered, animated, and optimized something that's not even possible today with the best engines. So the only dishonest part is ignoring the technical limitations to plague the size inconsistencies that have been explained and do so in a way that ignores everything about how it works in a technical and common sense.
My first sentence was more in reaction to the general antagonism in their answer. I can understand getting angry over someone clearly showing bias, but I litteraly commented once without targetting the game itself.This also seems kinda patronizing to him and it's not a proper agruement to his point in general as Zamasu brings up a valid point. So far you've just said it's an outlier, is inconsistent, and essentially dishonest to assume games have technical and budget limitations. Soo yeah hopefully I didn't sound rude that's just all I have to say about what you've said so far. I'll pop back out of the discussion though to see where things go
How would you suggest perspective be used to make something look bigger in respect to a character that is right in front of it? And zoom wouldn't be smart either since it would highlight the low-res textures on the Moon.You may use technical limitations as an argument, but games with far lower budget can show you a galaxy no problem and a guy being thrown into it. Calling it impossible in the first place is straight up wrong given the unlimited amount of cheap trick one can use (perspective, zoom in, etc...)
... Yeah that is something some manga verses often take into account, even. I'm pretty sure there was some One Piece drama regarding the height of some character and what should be used for it. And I am 100% sure that Beefcake does not have his GPE calculated because his size is massively inconsistent. And I am 101% sure that if you were to take a certain panel of the latest One Punch Man chapter literally, Garou (who is human-sized) would be several kilometers tall.If you take an equivalent in manga/comics it would be like deciding "that guy is that size on that panel and the rest is just the author's artstyle being weird".
Hold it dawgBecause outliers aren't just that? None of Chakravartin or Asura's feats are anywhere near that in both plot and gameplay; and the only way to apparently get this tier is by calcing an inconsistent moon.
Mb if I missed something, but I really don't see why one would try to calc too hard smth which is a lot of trouble rather than rely on consistency.
Yeah this actually happens literally all the time in op and other manga. It’s almost universally accepted that with giant objects it’s impossible to portray it being that size in front of a character while still being accurate. I really don’t know why this is a point of contention especially for so freaking long…... Yeah that is something some manga verses often take into account, even. I'm pretty sure there was some One Piece drama regarding the height of some character and what should be used for it
Since I have not received an answer to this I am assuming it was already covered earlier? If so, can somebody link those comments where this was addressed?I am not sure if this was answered, but since I was pinged:
Why aren't we using the frame with Asura and Moon to calculate the size? Especially when it seems like the Moon is much closer to the camera than Chakravartin in the frame where they are in, so perspective can be an issue there. And in scenarios of inconsistency, I'd think we'd prefer the lower end unless there is good reason to go with the higher one?
All of page 2 and onward I believe.Since I have not received an answer to this I am assuming it was already covered earlier? If so, can somebody link those comments where this was addressed?
Agreed.Jeez it's been almost a month already on this CRT? Good to know time flies faster than galaxy brain moons.
At this point a bullet point summary of this CRT and a concise list of everyone's views on this would likely move things along to a feasible conclusion.
Obviously I still agree with the upgrades (Even after reading the counterarguments, which to be honest is mostly based on splitting hairs imo).
Beautiful
Big Chankrus Calc is Based.
That's the point, the ratio between volume and radius is way skewed against the calculation, which means that its result would be higher if the equivalent of the radius of a non-spherical object could be calculated (maybe it can but it's definitely out of my paygrade). Remember that the radius divides the result, it doesn't multiply it.The high end would not be a lowball however, a sphere that is 6ft across would have a massively higher volume than a person, which is what's being proposed.
Well I agree that it's inaccurate, but the result could only possibly be higher, so I think rating the character based on this lowball would still be more accurate than having them at 4-B or whatever tier the moon would give when compared to Asura.I misunderstood the calculation, my bad. I thought that you had assumed a sphere with Chakravartin's size for the calculation, which would be much higher results. Since you used Chakra's estimated volume and mass, then applied that to the GBE formula, yes, it would be a lowball.
However as has been stated, this likely isn't a good way to calculate something like this, as it's not how the equation works.
Just be patient plsWhen this CRT is accepted
Actually, everyone agreed with this upgrade but people above us arguing about Chakravartin GBEJust be patient pls
I can't blame him for being impatient though considering this was a super straight forward CRT and it's been going for god knows how long at this point.Just be patient pls