- 12,085
- 2,096
- Thread starter
- #121
This seems like something that should be in a new thread specifically about inconclusives
As for now, can we remove his losses
As for now, can we remove his losses
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't get what you are saying, at all.Iapitus The Impaler said:Let me ask you this:
What makes a match where a star level fighter slaps a street level fighter into a red mist coating the grass of central park, but doing so makes the star level fighter a second layer of mist, different from a planet level fighter slapping a building level with enough force that they would have taken the same fate as the first 2 if it wasnt for his hax making it so that someone else on the other side of the planet is vaporized instead, and the only way they could actually take out enough people that their opponent can't reflect anymore is blowing up the planet along with himself? On paper of course, unless you have an arbitrary difference between how exactly the lack of win conditions for either side is produced
Oh, don't get me wrong. There can be boring matches that are still viable to be added to the profiles. I don't think anyone is gonna say that a user of type 8 immortality against a user of type 9 immortality with the 2 of them just killing eachother for eternity, is a terribly interesting match. However, it is still a viable match under the current rule set, written or unwritten.Dargoo Faust said:> What ... himself?
Both of those matchups are pretty terrible and shouldn't exist, if you ask me.
I'm giving other scenarios that are allowed to be added and kept on profiles under the current rule set which are the same on paper as many of McQueen's inconclusives.I'm Blue daba dee daba die said:I don't get what you are saying, at all.
Also, can I just remove the losses before we discuss the incons