• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Red Eclipse (Black Hat (Villainous) Rework 1 of +3?)

I understand that, but what I'm emphasizing here is not that BH is defined as a concept, but that it possesses the same type of intangibility. Not all entities with intangibility are the same; for example, spiritual or elemental intangibles are different. In this context, describing BH as an equally Intangibile entity, lika a concept, directly suggests that it exists as an abstraction.
This seems like a massive stretch. Along with the fact you were saying BH is a concept for the past few replies.
"The concept of friendship is literally an pure abstraction, and black hat implies that itself too exists as like a concept. Existing as like a concept still results in the same logic."
"The fact that it describes itself as an intangible concept is already type 1. There is no difference between abstraction concept and intangible concept."

He is not saying that this is a concept. All he is saying is demons are intagable and so is friendship, that is all. They are not comparable past the fact they both can't be touched.

So all three of the things that Aldo said in his observations were obviously describing the characteristics of BH.
He hadn't seen the master himself that was him taking notes on the meeting. The climax at the end is him meeting the master. So it is not direct observations. But again the main problem above all else is the same I have been asking for since the beginning. He lists out a massive list of things the master could be. I have been asking +4 replies now, give me direct evidence that he is the non-existence one in particular above all else listed.


To wrap this up I have been trying to tell you I am attempting to rework the profile with things already on the profile. With the current logic having several holes in it. I will be attempting to fix/upgrade it in the next or the one after. This one was purely made to smooth out problems and have it in a presentable state because at this moment it is an absolute mess.
 
This seems like a massive stretch. Along with the fact you were saying BH is a concept for the past few replies.
"The concept of friendship is literally an pure abstraction, and black hat implies that itself too exists as like a concept. Existing as like a concept still results in the same logic."
"The fact that it describes itself as an intangible concept is already type 1. There is no difference between abstraction concept and intangible concept."

He is not saying that this is a concept. All he is saying is demons are intagable and so is friendship, that is all. They are not comparable past the fact they both can't be touched.
This is from my previous articles. I have already made a slight change of mind after what you told me. Also, you already accept that BH is a concept, but you said it was only embodied. I tried to emphasize the main point in this source: an entity being the same as the existence of a concept seems to me clearly amenable to abstraction. Friendship is already shown as a concept, and then he states that demons (itself) are just as intangible as this concept. There are many types of intangibility, and it is associated with the existence of a concept in terms of species. This seems right to me, but if you still disagree, you can add me to disagree only in abstract existence.

He hadn't seen the master himself that was him taking notes on the meeting. The climax at the end is him meeting the master. So it is not direct observations. But again the main problem above all else is the same I have been asking for since the beginning. He lists out a massive list of things the master could be. I have been asking +4 replies now, give me direct evidence that he is the non-existence one in particular above all else listed.
Non-existence was just about its incorporeality. I even gave a scene to support it. But at the moment it seems quite right to postpone abstract existence and other things for the layout of the profile.
 
Last edited:
The alterations to possession and spatial manipulation have been changed and listed
 
Alright two approvals. I will be waiting for the grace period before I apply the changes. The next CRT mostly just needs sources and a couple other places I would like to check. Should be out sometime on the week of the 16th, if not earlier.
 
Back
Top