Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
Any/All- 2,039
- 919
also can we update the Allosaurus page due to this
Saurophaganax - Wikipedia
did you add it to the Wikipedia article or was it another person? I found the same link cited in the article ^
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
also can we update the Allosaurus page due to this
Lifting strength is how much force, not weight you can lift as defined on-site. Sauropods often are too slow to produce a lot of force, so I'd need to look up if they can get back up from falling over first for this to applyi'd expect something more than Class 10 to be honest, the largest sauropods are up to about 80 tonnes (or 100-120 counting Maraapunisaurus and "Bruhathkayosaurus")
With regard to natural/cosmic phenomena^There's more articles in the categories to cite from and make VSBW Real World entries/profiles/articles/pages about though, so that's why I linked these initially
another person, the paper was recently published and I see a lot of people talking about it![]()
Saurophaganax - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
did you add it to the Wikipedia article or was it another person? I found the same link cited in the article ^
Oh alright, thanks for the infoanother person, the paper was recently published and I see a lot of people talking about it
Goodbye Saurophaganax maximus, welcome Allosaurus anax
Missing the point. I already knew and addressed this. Not to mention, why didn't you immediately say or recite it was to reduce clutter from your initial replies? I don't remember everything.I'm not saying we add the Wikipedia categories to VSBW, just make profiles/articles/pages in VSBW based on (via citing from) the Wikipedia articles of the stuff within the Wikipedia categories, that's what I meant by expanding the database + adding more entries.
Not to mention, why didn't you immediately say or recite it was to reduce clutter from your initial replies?
While you could lift in any direction and sauropods regularly withstand their weight, they ironically die and can't get back up if they fall. https://www.science.org/content/art... sauropod walked this,it's going to be dead.”Lifting strength is how much force, not weight you can lift as defined on-site. Sauropods often are too slow to produce a lot of force, so I'd need to look up if they can get back up from falling over first for this to apply
What about longer sections that can take up the entire screen at once for the average user, like the mammals section for example? We could have a bit of a tabber section prevent clutter and it would be easy for people to navigate even with scientific names. For scientific names, we go for the more public ones that are more likely to be understood by regular peoplePersonally, I like how we already have the verse page set up when it comes to animals and such. I mean, do you really think the average person is gonna know what an Archaea or a Chordata is? You're more likely to find people who know what a fish or a bird is.
yeah I'm not sure if we should stick to making individual entries/profiles/articles/pages OR grouping them together and giving the groups their own entries/profiles/articles/pages OR using tabs to group them together within the Real World verse page itself for all the Real World verses entries and content sections, but I agree with the approach for naming.What about longer sections that can take up the entire screen at once for the average user, like the mammals section for example? We could have a bit of a tabber section prevent clutter and it would be easy for people to navigate even with scientific names. For scientific names, we go for the more public ones that are more likely to be understood by regular people
Like I said, I prefer what we already got. We got cnidarians? Boom, Cnidarian section. We got mollusks? Boom! Mollusk section. Everything we got now is the easiest to understand it could be; any changes are just going to complicate things.For scientific names, we go for the more public ones that are more likely to be understood by regular people
I have no idea what walruses have to do with any of this, but these seem about right. A muskox would be designed for headbutts anyhow given they are related to goats.Question: What does everyone think of this and this profile?
Should've separated the other walrus profile; it's supposed to be separate. Thank you for the feedback!I have no idea what walruses have to do with any of this, but these seem about right. A muskox would be designed for headbutts anyhow given they are related to goats.
So uhh... Would this be points in favor of the mice, or would this be points against the Asian Bullfrog?:
I mean the frog isn't bothered by eight whole mice, but it struggles to try and grab one.
Ok.I am fine with H3110l12345I20's conclusions here, as well as with his new profile page drafts.![]()
Yeah, I basically put updates whenever one pops up. The recent post I put up about crows is an example.Ok.
To be fair, I treat discussion threads as more of a sandbox to talk about stuff (and Flashlight is possibly doing the same thing), however, if a change is intentionally stated to be deserving a CRT, I'll put it in a CRT and contact the relevant user about it.
Are references required if I link the source instead?Just follow the general template laid out in the other plane pages and source yer shit.
Do both.Are references required if I link the source instead?
If it's a plane you can find in War Thunder, chances are there's a leaked military document for it somewhere.I am having some troubles finding dimensions for the Gripen A specifically, the best ones I can currently find is this. But I am not sure if it's reliable or not. Should I still use it with a message saying it's not reliable, or just skip it completely? Just note it's only for the dimensions (Height, length, and wingspan.)
Funnily enough, War Thunder actively nerf Sweden hard, so their statistics are likely off...If it's a plane you can find in War Thunder, chances are there's a leaked military document for it somewhere.
Definitely, not sure what tier though.Possible wasp intelligence feat?: https://www.earth.com/news/an-8-year-olds-backyard-discovery-of-ants-wasps-changed-science/
Well, is it comparable to the bottle noise dolphin, chimp, elephant, tool making etc?I am currently leaning towards it being high-animalistic, though it may be one step below it. What do you guys think?
No, but.Well, is it comparable to the bottle noise dolphin, chimp, elephant, tool making etc?
Wdym by specialized?No, but.
I would say, that mimicking a scent/chemical from Ant's to give the Wasp's eggs is a pretty decent intelligent feat since it allows the Wasps, much higher chances of surviving, due to the protection they would gain from being in a ants nest, and be feed. That means the Wasps know how to get that specific chemical/scent of, and what that specific scent, will have for effect for the eggs and the ants.
Now while this I think is High-Animalistic, as a feat... It's also extremely specialised...
Intelligence feats can be extremely specialized, meaning they are only impressive in certain areas.Wdym by specialized?
Not a bad explanation for someone who's tired. Although...Intelligence feats can be extremely specialized, meaning they are only impressive in certain areas.
Meaning that a being with overall lower intelligence may have areas they are more intelligent in than beings above them.
(Trying to explain it before getting my first cup of coffee is not the best idea.)