also can we update the Allosaurus page due to this
Lifting strength is how much force, not weight you can lift as defined on-site. Sauropods often are too slow to produce a lot of force, so I'd need to look up if they can get back up from falling over first for this to apply
With regard to natural/cosmic phenomena
another person, the paper was recently published and I see a lot of people talking about itSaurophaganax - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
did you add it to the Wikipedia article or was it another person? I found the same link cited in the article ^
Oh alright, thanks for the info
Missing the point. I already knew and addressed this. Not to mention, why didn't you immediately say or recite it was to reduce clutter from your initial replies? I don't remember everything.
While you could lift in any direction and sauropods regularly withstand their weight, they ironically die and can't get back up if they fall. https://www.science.org/content/art... sauropod walked this,it's going to be dead.”
What about longer sections that can take up the entire screen at once for the average user, like the mammals section for example? We could have a bit of a tabber section prevent clutter and it would be easy for people to navigate even with scientific names. For scientific names, we go for the more public ones that are more likely to be understood by regular people
yeah I'm not sure if we should stick to making individual entries/profiles/articles/pages OR grouping them together and giving the groups their own entries/profiles/articles/pages OR using tabs to group them together within the Real World verse page itself for all the Real World verses entries and content sections, but I agree with the approach for naming.
Like I said, I prefer what we already got. We got cnidarians? Boom, Cnidarian section. We got mollusks? Boom! Mollusk section. Everything we got now is the easiest to understand it could be; any changes are just going to complicate things.
