- 8,857
- 5,697
Orochi feat outlier because boros > orochi but giai canon > collapsing star roaring canon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not necessarily, but idc anymore.Wouldn’t that just make Orochi’s calc an outlier then
It's why I suggest this. If we really can't come up with a method. Just use the standard calc as a lowball.At this point we really might as well just use the standard calc for surface wiping
So yeah, Orochi’s is definitely an outlier if his feat is over 10x Boros’ maximum output, beyond his normal strength in Meteoric Burst, yet he’s supposed to be weaker than Released Boros.Not necessarily, but idc anymore.
Even vaporization that's currently being advocated for is almost a 10th of the low-end Orochi calc.
How do I attach images from a mobile device?Scan for this?
Class Z is not an outlier though.Neutral on not using the Orochi calculation, but just taking LS seems like double standards.
But at the same time, it's just cherrypicking things from the featClass Z is not an outlier though.
I don't see a problem, the lifting is fine but the AP is an outlier.But at the same time, it's just cherrypicking things from the feat
Any anti-feat to Tatsumaki? if not, why would it be an outlier?Also, it's thousands of times higher than Tatsumaki, who scales to PsykoOrochi. So this could be an outlier.
The mass and the KE are technically speaking two different things in regard to the calc. So even if KE is found to be an outlier because it breaks our above rules, the mass from the drag may not be.
- The calculated kinetic energy value is heavily inconsistent with the rest of the cast in the series. EX: Quicksilver's calculated speed cannot be used to derive kinetic energy as it heavily contradicts his established power levels.
- There is a destruction/AP calculation contradicting a kinetic energy calculation. The destruction/AP calculation would take priority over the kinetic energy calculation in this case as the AP calculation would be a better proof in regards to how much damage he/she is capable of in an attack.
- For example, if a character launches a 200kg metal ball against a common wall at Mach 300, but the wall remains largely undamaged, the energy required to cause the minor damage on the wall would take priority over the kinetic energy derived from speed in this case.
I mean, yeah, but Tatsumaki has no anti-feat, its not like tatsumaki said ''Oh, I can't lift more rocks than this'', the feat was also very casual, Orochi being higher doesnt means outlier@Bernk I'm talking about Orochi's feat being vastly higher than Tatsumaki's, who's far more powerful than him.
Tatsumaki already was severely hurt from her fight against Psykos, and her own experession also shows the feat to be casual. Tatsumaki was bleeding from the brow afterwards, which Espers do when they exert themselves.
While true, she wasn't bleeding in the previous page showing her face. So the only time it could have happened is between the tsunami coming and her lifting the rocksTatsumaki already was severely hurt from her fight against Psykos
This was explained earlier in the thread.Wouldn't Psykorochi's feat be Moon level if it used KE as well? Speaking of why don't we use KE for that feat again?
Okay then.@Fluffy Our rules don't really work that way. If it's an inflated portrayal, we probably wouldn't use any aspect.
Also, it's thousands of times higher than Tatsumaki, who scales to PsykoOrochi. So this could be an outlier.
The plate's depiction was inconsistent (later shots for example showed it being cloud level above the oceans rather than in high atmosphere), and the damages it did when it impacted the Earth contradict the idea that it was 5-C or Low 5-B.Speaking of why don't we use KE for that feat again?
Out of curiosity, what's the rating for KE?
that would be it falling down right?The plate's depiction was inconsistent (later shots for example showed it being cloud level above the oceans rather than in high atmosphere),
if the damage it done was realistic then pretty much all life on earth would be destroyed, also would it necessarily fall down with the same KE as it was launched up with to begin with?, and the damages it did when it impacted the Earth contradict the idea that it was 5-C or Low 5-B.
No, because this is the immediate page after the space shotthat would be it falling down right?
Yes, which is why the Low 5-B and 5-C option was discarded, along with the fact that the original calc had the plate moving 8 times faster than escape velocity, which doesn't make scientific sense as it immediately fell back down.if the damage it done was realistic then pretty much all life on earth would be destroyed
yeah after, what would be the point of the shot if it's just the same thing over again. we see it falling even more in the pages after that. if there is a interpretation that doesn't contradict anything it would be better than one that ignores visual evidence
i mean if it were 200+petatons then there would be a bit more damage than a tsunamiNo, because this is the immediate page after the space shot
Yes, which is why the Low 5-B and 5-C option was discarded, along with the fact that the original calc had the plate moving 8 times faster than escape velocity, which doesn't make scientific sense as it immediately fell back down.
Probably, but it still doesn't back up that KE should be used.i mean if it were 200+petatons then there would be a bit more damage than a tsunami
No, it is still more than likely an outlier.Is the low end accepted in Orochi's feat?
In that case, we'll just put the characters at level 5-C and scale Boros and Tatsumaki to Orochi.
Asking Authors for stuff like this is against wiki rules btw.. The easiest way to ask about this is on Twitter of Murata and ONE's, but so far the true values seem to be unknown.
It is?Asking Authors for stuff like this is against wiki rules btw.
I think it depends on the question? iircIt is?
We have a policy against using statements that are leading questions or just outright asking an author if a character can do X.It is?
I don't think we should just go to Murata or ONE and ask what Boros' attacks does or whether CSRC leaves some crater or not. Isn't that against the rules.We have a policy against using statements that are leading questions or just outright asking an author if a character can do X.
Clarifying a confusing issue, however, is allowed to my knowledge. Like if a character used a certain ability off screen to get to a plot point.