• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Orochi ray pushes the Earth's core apart

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not necessarily, but idc anymore.

Even vaporization that's currently being advocated for is almost a 10th of the low-end Orochi calc.
So yeah, Orochi’s is definitely an outlier if his feat is over 10x Boros’ maximum output, beyond his normal strength in Meteoric Burst, yet he’s supposed to be weaker than Released Boros.

Not to mention that other characters far stronger than Orochi (Psykorochi and Tatsumaki) consistently perform Tier 6 feats as well.
 
Neutral on not using the Orochi calculation, but just taking LS seems like double standards.
 
@Fluffy Our rules don't really work that way. If it's an inflated portrayal, we probably wouldn't use any aspect.

Also, it's thousands of times higher than Tatsumaki, who scales to PsykoOrochi. So this could be an outlier.
 
Well it may not be cherry picking
  • The calculated kinetic energy value is heavily inconsistent with the rest of the cast in the series. EX: Quicksilver's calculated speed cannot be used to derive kinetic energy as it heavily contradicts his established power levels.
  • There is a destruction/AP calculation contradicting a kinetic energy calculation. The destruction/AP calculation would take priority over the kinetic energy calculation in this case as the AP calculation would be a better proof in regards to how much damage he/she is capable of in an attack.
    • For example, if a character launches a 200kg metal ball against a common wall at Mach 300, but the wall remains largely undamaged, the energy required to cause the minor damage on the wall would take priority over the kinetic energy derived from speed in this case.
The mass and the KE are technically speaking two different things in regard to the calc. So even if KE is found to be an outlier because it breaks our above rules, the mass from the drag may not be.

But idk it can be considered cherry picking as well.
 
@Bernk I'm talking about Orochi's feat being vastly higher than Tatsumaki's, who's far more powerful than him (and this took enough effort to make her bleed). I'm not saying her feat is an outlier.
 
@Bernk I'm talking about Orochi's feat being vastly higher than Tatsumaki's, who's far more powerful than him.
I mean, yeah, but Tatsumaki has no anti-feat, its not like tatsumaki said ''Oh, I can't lift more rocks than this'', the feat was also very casual, Orochi being higher doesnt means outlier
 
Speaking of why don't we use KE for that feat again?
The plate's depiction was inconsistent (later shots for example showed it being cloud level above the oceans rather than in high atmosphere), and the damages it did when it impacted the Earth contradict the idea that it was 5-C or Low 5-B.
Out of curiosity, what's the rating for KE?
  • 1 Second: 4.4887616468047E+30 Joules
  • 10 seconds: 4.4887616468047E+28 Joules
 
Kind of interesting, then, because it's a fairly casual feat. Maybe that could work in the future. Not right now, though.
 
On the Psykorochi feat, I should bring up that the speed at which the plate was moving cannot be anything above the Earth’s escape velocity because it didn’t eject and float away from Earth. It fell back down.

Just for consideration if yous ever decide to re-calc Psykorochi’s feat using KE.
 
The plate's depiction was inconsistent (later shots for example showed it being cloud level above the oceans rather than in high atmosphere),
that would be it falling down right?
, and the damages it did when it impacted the Earth contradict the idea that it was 5-C or Low 5-B.
if the damage it done was realistic then pretty much all life on earth would be destroyed, also would it necessarily fall down with the same KE as it was launched up with to begin with?
 
yeah after, what would be the point of the shot if it's just the same thing over again. we see it falling even more in the pages after that. if there is a interpretation that doesn't contradict anything it would be better than one that ignores visual evidence
No, because this is the immediate page after the space shot

Yes, which is why the Low 5-B and 5-C option was discarded, along with the fact that the original calc had the plate moving 8 times faster than escape velocity, which doesn't make scientific sense as it immediately fell back down.
i mean if it were 200+petatons then there would be a bit more damage than a tsunami
 
Following. I'll have to check out the calcs (though it's not like I'm a calc member or can tell which seems better to use, so my opinion is likely Jack-O Valentine.)
 
Is the low end accepted in Orochi's feat?
In that case, we'll just put the characters at level 5-C and scale Boros and Tatsumaki to Orochi.
The current CSRT calculation looks like a big lowball and I generally don't know how to calculate the feat correctly. Evaporation seems logical, but in fact the attack could mean the destruction of part of the mantle. The easiest way to ask about this is on Twitter of Murata and ONE's, but so far the true values seem to be unknown.
 
We have a policy against using statements that are leading questions or just outright asking an author if a character can do X.

Clarifying a confusing issue, however, is allowed to my knowledge. Like if a character used a certain ability off screen to get to a plot point.
 
We have a policy against using statements that are leading questions or just outright asking an author if a character can do X.

Clarifying a confusing issue, however, is allowed to my knowledge. Like if a character used a certain ability off screen to get to a plot point.
I don't think we should just go to Murata or ONE and ask what Boros' attacks does or whether CSRC leaves some crater or not. Isn't that against the rules.

Also earlier, I proposes just using the standard surface wiping calc as a lowball if we can't come up with a certain method. Thoughts?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top