- 31,372
- 34,119
I think Qawsed makes sense.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
The Orochi ray pushes the Earth's core apart
- Thread starter NikHelton
- Start date
- Status
- 9,629
- 8,663
Does it even matter whether that sphere is energy or physical mass? It is occupying a space and therefore it is pushing the same amount of mass sideways. It was odd to me how the feat was downgraded to High 6-A when quadrillion of tons worth of matter are still being moved, regardless of what that sphere is made of.
I don't see the problem with NikHelton's version.
I don't see the problem with NikHelton's version.
Last edited:
- 20,529
- 17,433
Because there wasn't a calc for the cylinder of matter distorted from the pull until USK did his version and this one.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,053
- 5,983
Wont moving something be LS not AP? and his AP would be the amp from getting energy from the core? or what am i missing how is Orochi lifting something scaling to his AP
- 3,063
- 1,657
- Thread starter
- #45
What do you say to my answer above?
- 24,974
- 26,821
Only bump after 12 hours
- 24,974
- 26,821
It is
WrongIdea21
He/Him- 4,089
- 2,153
Qawsed makes a lot sense, i agree with Qawsed
- 2,926
- 1,399
So, I agree that what Orochi pulled was the core of the earth, but I would like to say that my calculation is a huge LOWBALL.
We considered 20 seconds for the distance between the core and the ground, in this case, the time it took Orochi to pull the sphere, now, in my calculation, it's just the mantle being pushed by the sphere, which shouldn't be 5 seconds and with that we have 5-C.
We considered 20 seconds for the distance between the core and the ground, in this case, the time it took Orochi to pull the sphere, now, in my calculation, it's just the mantle being pushed by the sphere, which shouldn't be 5 seconds and with that we have 5-C.
- 3,063
- 1,657
- Thread starter
- #56
What do you think about my version?
- 20,529
- 17,433
The mantel wasn't moved, but the Outer Core going by the art. The change I stated was that I don't think anything involving the inner core should be used in the calc since Orochi just sucked energy from it.
- 3,063
- 1,657
- Thread starter
- #58
I made changes. You can check the results.
- 19,217
- 16,832
@Qawsedf234 Can you check out the changes to the calc so we can be done here quicker...
- 24,974
- 26,821
You can't ping if you're not staff
- 24,974
- 26,821
You can only bump again after 12 hours
- 3,566
- 879
Definitely agree with the low 5-B upgrade, the OP arguments are things that I already mentioned in the downgrade thread but obviously nobody listened hope this one goes well
- 19,217
- 16,832
- 19,217
- 16,832
imo I think 10 or 15 seconds works best. 15 seems more accurate and safe though.
- 3,063
- 1,657
- Thread starter
- #73
To be honest, I expected that the result obtained would give me a high level of 5-C and Saitama would be an invincible fighter in this tier, but it looks like he will be a little stronger than the basic Low 5-B 
By the way, what about scaling it to 5-B due to quotes and multiple superiority over Orochi?
By the way, what about scaling it to 5-B due to quotes and multiple superiority over Orochi?
- 8,857
- 5,697
What is the difference between the new calculation and the current one?
- 3,063
- 1,657
- Thread starter
- #75
USK's calculation uses only the KE of the first layer of the outer core, while mine uses the KE of all layers.
Last edited:
- 8,857
- 5,697
I see that makes sense, I agree that this calculation is more accurate. Then, how is this not an outlier like another dude mentioned above?
- 3,063
- 1,657
- Thread starter
- #78
Do you mean that the result seems too high?
- 3,566
- 879
And why would this be an outlier?
- 8,857
- 5,697
It's that the results are far higher than any previous feat before it when stronger characters have been hyped up for significantly weaker feats. Example boros or psykos who's feat levels are surface busters but then orochi who's fodder to them is like planetary?
- Status
