- 43,106
- 37,246
Yeah, of course. But good lord.I mean, this is a big part of JoJo scaling (alongside MFTL), of course it will get heated over time
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, of course. But good lord.I mean, this is a big part of JoJo scaling (alongside MFTL), of course it will get heated over time
JOJO fans doing thingswtf happened to this thread?
I've already explained twice and given explanations on how his ability specifically works, sorry but I'm not nor am i obligated to referring to his ability in a more complicated way than needed.
Ok so unless you can quantify or prove which things pucci is doing and which things are naturally occuring,
asserting Pucci is doing anything without concrete evidence is simply fallacious.
And again just because its not stated that it was the universe doing that, doesn't mean it was the universe wasn't doing that,
thats another argument from ignorance. And if its stated fate/the universe was created by made in heaven or in guides JUST SHOW ME, its not that hard what the hell...
What im trying to say is that we cannot assume Pucci is creating the universe or fate if there is nothing supporting that.
If it confuses you, think of me taking the neutral stance, and you on what i think is the positive that he is creating the universe or fate.
I don't believe is necessarily ED,
ill just spell it out for you this time and tell you ill take a neutral stance on this, because all the scan says is the end of the universe, which doesn't necessarily indicate pucci is the one doing it, for all we know it could be something that naturally happens, not something caused by Pucci or MIH itself. And again ill ask you to show proof he set out the fate of the universe (im taking neutral again).
If your argument is fallacious obviously we cannot take it to hold any sort of weight, so i'm not gonna ignore fallacious arguments you use and not call them out bro what The scan i sent explains how the loop works, it doesn't assert everything within it is caused by pucci which is why im asking you to identify and prove pucci what pucci did (specifically create the universe/fate)
Since when was asking for proof being ignorant what? I pointed out your reasoning was fallacious
and saying its just "common sense" is another fallacious argument (appeal to common sense).
And i never asserted it was a random coincidence,
I'm saying that there might not be a possibility it was created naturally or by a force external to them, or literally anything else, so given all of these possibilities i asked you to prove why out of all these explanations that yours is superior. Also I find it funny your saying its not a probability when you said it was multiple times.
Unless it is 100% we cannot hold that to be the truth no matter the probability, without further evidence you would be applying an appeal to probability fallacy.
Yeah ill just wait on all of that
Because it would be easier to progress dialectics and come to a general consensus, which should be the point of every discussion
but ok. And no one is asking you to do anything for the sake of the thread, nor is anyone forcing you, you are only doing this quite literally cause you chose to.
Anyways since you have already told me you arent willing to do it i doubt im gonna respond unless you present scans or say something I find really dumb.
It's just that time of the week lad.wtf happened to this thread?
What the **** man.How is asking to discuss opinions over a call cringe if you have speech impediment issues just say that lmao
Noo, it having way more scans just make the argument way more solid to finally close the threadDude we're decked out on scans and translations chill out lol
True, but I was mostly dicking around cause I can't imagine this thread getting accepted anytime soon with all the counter-evidence.Noo, it having way more scans just make the argument way more solid to finally close the thread
I had the impression he was retconned out of existenceeverything is undone in some sort of paradoxical fashion).
Thank you for your unneeded, but very, VERY rude concern, but no: I dont have any of these disabilities you seem to speak of.How is asking to discuss opinions over a call cringe if you have speech impediment issues just say that lmao
If your argument is fallacious obviously the reasoning used for your argument wouldn't be accepted, and if that is the only argument presented then the entire point that was attempted to be made falls apart.
If you actually bothered to read what you sent me, it literally tells you that if an argument is fallacious then the way they are arguing for it is improper, and if they cannot use that argument, and we are left with no proper argument, then the entire point would be dismissed.
The reason I came on this wiki primarily, was to change peoples opinions on certain topics whether its within this wiki, or outside of it, because I believe the point of all discussions is to come to a general consensus, and actually be able to understand each other properly, rather than text debate for hours and days and going ad nauseum.Thank you for your unneeded, but very, VERY rude concern, but no: I dont have any of these disabilities you seem to speak of.
"Come debate on discord via VC, because why not? ignoring the fact that all the shit we have to discuss about HAS to be on this very thread. I'll also ignore the fact that the OP never said [Come debate on discord fellas], because I dont care anyways. Oh! I should not forget, that I dont really care about 3rd parties, which is obvious enough, given that I dont want those that dont know JoJo to actually understand about what's happening.
Lets also NOT have the discussion itself stay as a text, IN this wiki itself, where said thread was created for people to E X P L A I N via text, and for others to read and understand. This wiki doesnt take the discussion to somewhere else either.
But I still dont care! I dont care if people have to listen to my voice either, nor that we all have to talk to eachother. The whole wiki should join as well, where communication sucks and NOT everybody PROBABLY has a mic. Even then, how would we put out our explanations later on- Oh, via recording it? But of course, dont give a **** about consent it haha "
I could go on and list even more problems to what would happen if we did as you said, fella. Even then, does this wiki say we should go and, "Hop onto discord and VC" (Could someone answer this question please)
Do you now understand as to why that sounded cringe? Even then, I dont see as to how texting is difficult though? "If you have speech impediment issues, then say it lmao" If you cant debate on a wiki where its all about text only, and said debate is only supposed to be here, then I dont think you should be here, mate.
"Some people are just better at verbal communication, so it can compensate for their unsound position and potentially lacking reasoning." If this is your reason, then I'm sorry, and with all sincerity that I could muster at best: You'll have to either do it via text, or just dont stay in this thread mate.
Back to another point..
There are other reasons as to why that sounded cringe, too. I just generally dont like the debate community outside of VSBW with how toxic and cringey they are, the "VC debators" even more so. Didnt mean to come off as heated there, so my bad there.
And finally: Fallacies... Ah yes, who thinks that fallacies mean everything? Except for these people you generally meet/see in the debate community outside of VSBW? Fallacies isnt the gospel either, neither does it mean all shit. If you cant counter a person's argument inherently, then fallacies mean all jack here. And even then, why tf is it supposed to hold some big merit here? Wow.
That wasn't my point i said i could explain myself better on a vc and you could understand my argument better in a vc, not because my position is unsound or lacks reasoning which i strongly disagree with and I find especially dumb considered I explained my reasoning and stance multiple times and provided evidence for it."Some people are just better at verbal communication, so it can compensate for their unsound position and potentially lacking reasoning." If this is your reason, then I'm sorry, and with all sincerity that I could muster at best: You'll have to either do it via text, or just dont stay in this thread mate.
Back to another point..
They aren't all "vc debaters" although the best/better ones such as seththeprogrammer, aero, trini, etc, are, and I would think its because again is vastly harder to come to a general consensus when your typing and spending hours and days waiting for a response. Nobody is forcing you or anyone else, I simply asked, and it was rejected, so I stopped replying to him because I said everything i possibly could and I don't think we can ever reach a conclusion the way we were going.There are other reasons as to why that sounded cringe, too. I just generally dont like the debate community outside of VSBW with how toxic and cringey they are, the "VC debators" even more so. Didnt mean to come off as heated there, so my bad there.
I never said I think fallacy's mean everything. I think if your argument is fallacious, then the way your arguing it must not be based on sound reasoning, which is why im pointing out the fallacies because thats literally me pointing out the failure in reasoning. If you think you can argue for something fallaciously and expect that anyone competent will let that slide without pointing out that error, then I seriously don't know what to tell you.And finally: Fallacies... Ah yes, who thinks that fallacies mean everything? Except for these people you generally meet/see in the debate community outside of VSBW? Fallacies isnt the gospel either, neither does it mean all shit. If you cant counter a person's argument inherently, then fallacies mean all jack here. And even then, why tf is it supposed to hold some big merit here? Wow.
my badBoth of you. Cut. It. Out.
Take it to private messages or Discord or whatever. Just don't derail here.
Yeah, sorry. Didnt mean to.Both of you. Cut. It. Out.
Take it to private messages or Discord or whatever. Just don't derail here.
The former.I guess low 2-C environment destruction makes sense, but question, did pucci create a new universe with made in heaven or travel to a new one that already existed after resetting the old one?
Man, you just can't leave a thread unmoderated without it turning to a cringefest...
@DontTalkDT what do you think about this case?
no???I'm going to wait until a new wording is proposed for Pucci's profile to elaborate, but with the "Environmental Destruction" of MiH noted, it shouldn't be Low 2-C but 3-A.
What? "3-A" No??? Just how-I'm going to wait until a new wording is proposed for Pucci's profile to elaborate, but with the "Environmental Destruction" of MiH noted, it shouldn't be Low 2-C but 3-A.
that's what I kinda suggested earlier actually, with the whole multi galaxy level thingFrom skimming through the replies of the thread I have yet to see a scan suggesting anything above 3-A. For Low 2-C I would want to see it with context, as things like a new history and future and stuff can easily be figurative.
As for the question of environmental destruction or not: That depends a bit on how you read the page in question. If you define it as the ability to damage an environment then yes. (Although I wonder how we would define the size of an area necessary to reach a certain ED rating then)
If one reads it as non-combat applicable AP, meaning that it is measured in energy, I'm a bit sceptical of the idea that the weird time manipulation effects regarding KE should be equalled to infinite non-combat applicable attack power. Since the idea is to bring the universe to its natural ends giving everything infinite KE that would instantly destroy it sounds somewhat weird. If it should be infinite KE, it would be High 3-A ED, though.
What do you mean by "Multi Galaxy level"? Are you talking about MIH being that?that's what I kinda suggested earlier actually, with the whole multi galaxy level thing
even tho that's different
well it was kinda debunked already I think? But if made in heaven were accelerating time and nothing else then it would be accelerating preixisting matter and energy which is finite, so the environmental damage wouldn't affect the space of the actual universe so it couldn't be an actual universal feat was what I thoughtWhat do you mean by "Multi Galaxy level"? Are you talking about MIH being that?