The page mentions that it is non combat applicable AP in its definition.
Actual semantics, reality warping, plant manip, acid, whatever, there's many examples of what can qualify as ED and even what we treat it as, at least from what I've seen, that isn't inherently "joules", like if a character has the power to turn ground into mud and does it against a whole city, leveling and sinking said city, that's pretty blatant ED but not what can be quantified with joules or straightforward math.
When you talk about AP, it's about how much joules of energy a character can release in one shot.
Would hate to be any reality warper or cosmic tier entity right about now then.
That's what the tiering system is based on.
Till ya hit tier 2 anyway.
Pucci isn't releasing any quantifiable amount of joules in his attack. I think the page was created by Dargoo and he has retired/left.
First off, false, **** at worst he'd still have up to High 3-A based SOLELY on his upper KE manip.
Yeah and I have him on discord, I can literally go ask.
His individual intent alone wouldn't matter anymore since it is about how we collectively decide to treat it.
And collectively we've been doing just fine till five minutes ago so I wouldn't say that's ever been an issue till now and is unironically entirely an issue of semantics given as said, Pucci is a defining example of what qualifies. Given, as we see, universe ends and begins under his own will but he can't focus that power or potential in a meaningful offensive manner.
My point of contention here is not related to this thread, but to better clarify how we treat ED, so I will reserve that discussion for another appropriate thread.
Yeah a 'staff' thread, huge red flag there AKM, especially following "how we collectively decide to treat it", if you want to, unironically, argue semantics, it best be available to everyone given as said, it's how we as a wiki treat it no?