The word is also cardinality in Japanese. He didn't go like "oh yeah a car actually means a train" or make up different meanings for words. All of it is explained pretty clearly.
However, this is not the case. Even if you make a claim and it is true, it will not be valid unless you can harmonise it with the OP. And there are no inconsistencies or contradictions here
Which makes 0 sense with the context of the story btw but pop off sure.
True. Instincts just take over whenever I see what I perceive to be intellectual dishonesty and misinformation.
A word can have more than one meaning and even a word can have 16 meanings, so what can we do? We look at the context and ask the person who uses that word in which sense you used it and according to his answer we determine the meaning of the word. There is no such thing as "a word has 3 meanings, I say the meaning I want is correct, and what the person who says the word says is unimportant" as you do.
Nothing in the blog implies that the intent is set theory, though. It consists of some loaded questions and a bunch of contradictory answers from an author who doesn't remember much of his own story and doesn't have a strong grasp of English. It doesn't really prove much.
And, as I mentioned before, it doesn't make any sense within the story to interpret it as literal cardinality when you take into account all of the context that was revealed later on of what and how 濃度 is supposed to be.
It's just explaining the meaning behind all the buzzword mumbo-jumbo, hence 'And this means'. I don't understand what's difficult to comprehend about that.
Yeah, they're infinitely vast pocket dimensions, cool. But how does that imply they can generate an infinite cardinal universes and things that are akin to fiction for them?
That's not my problem, my problem is everything. If by 'addressed' you mean ignoring to the totality of context that was laid later on, then sure.
I'm just gonna ignore you since I can't comprehend 99% of what you say most of the time.
Stuff that were never said in the verse but here we are.
none of these is related nor relevant to what I said ????.
Jesse, What the **** Are You Talking About.
It's like saying that because bear is mentioned in a sentence you make, it is definitely called bear here, which would be brain death to ignore the use of the word bear in other meanings.
It makes sense. Don't get where you're coming from. It's pretty clearly written in the sandbox. But Ig you do you.
Sure, I would also be mad if a verse I dislike was being upgraded.
I'm talking about you're bullshitting with this "pocket dimensions" bullshit.
So you have literally presented nothing that refutes the block, in fact, and you have a nonsense by claiming that something that is in the novel does not exist, how do you decide which one makes sense in the context?
It pretty clearly is stated and implied. I guess when you don't have arguments you resort to "you're just wrong" without proper explanations. It's pretty clearly stated and explained.
Nah, it still makes sense. It talks about what they are, what they can do and what they will do. The context is pretty clearly explained by the author. There are many quotes about him stating the Computer Gods can create set theory - as shown in the blog.
So, it's hard for you to comprehend the meaning being set theory structures being created? You do you I guess.
Already explained in the blog. If you need help that much, simply put, video games and stories have already been created in these spaces before. (V7 game and V6 book) so, they can have fictional stories created.
I didn't. You just either 1. Don't understand 2. You're just being disingenuous. They can create set theory. They can create universes. Set Theory is computer generated world. All these simple things are clearly addressed.
It was said, and pretty clearly.
It is.
Lol
Yeah. Can I put you down as agree?
Sarcasm?
I'm talking about the VPS, which is, in fact, pocket dimensions.
I can't refutes what I can't comprehend.
I've already presented my reasoning. And, Ironically, your entire argument boils down to 'you're wrong' and 'already addressed' without doing much. Funny, innit.
1. At this point you're just twisting the context to fits your narrative
VPS is not a set theory structure, so yeah.
Again, its called that because it can be easily altered and essentially programmed to suit your preferences. That doesn't make it infinitely below you nor fictional. Not to mention that the DT's blog you cited itself disagrees with what you're saying.
You did. If you didn't, why are you excluding the light and heavy nature shenanigans that are deeply related to 濃度 and how it relates to cardinality, thus making sense?
Show me some specific scans from the novels itself that explicitly and clearly show that? I'll be waiting. And don't just refer to the blog; provide the citation here.
Is it though, I never mentioned the dream stuff at all.
Obviously no, you can be 3 dimensional and tier 0 duh. Totally not logically contradictory.
yo link dont work
It would be futile to write more to someone who does not have the capacity to understand, you are right, I do not need to explain to you further.
They are, in fact, universes. If calling them pocket dimensions helps you feel better then sure go ahead I guess. Doesn't change the fact that what they create are stated to be universes in-verse and by the author.
It's really not that hard to understand him.
What's funny is you never pointing out how I'm wrong. I can't give in-deptg explanations when from the start you resort to "wrong because I said so"
I'm not. Not only is the context provided by the author but the LN.
Until you say something that's not "you're wrong" and give solid reasonings, going in circles will be what happens. It's up to you wether or not to keep going with "lmao wrong context. Wrong meaning."
I didn't cherry pick. He quite clearly talks about about set theory. You can keep saying there are things there which aren't stated, but it's still not a valid argument. If you mean the part where the author mentioned infinite density, I also addressed it in the blog.
They are.
Not really. You literally just admitted they can be programmed to preferences. Youre admitting they can be programmed to have fictional stories in them. And this still doesn't address rest of the quotes and evidence provided from the author about what they can do.
I didn't. When talking about set theory, it's referred to the computer gods. In fact, he even said (the author) that set theory has everything to do with Computer Gods.
It's not baseless. I already addressed this.
Why should I cite things you should be able to read? Deadass either you're trolling, you skimmed the blog, or now you're lying.
Yeah, it is relevant.
Alright, sure. Pretty much everyone realizes it's up to their vote. Btw, since you have a new roll, how far do your privileges extend when voting? I might have to bold your vote if it counts as staff.
It's a valid scan. In fact, this literally backs up what's in the blog about cardinality being used in-verse. Thanks.
We have literally confirmed the validity of the scans by 2 separate (and neutral, for that matter) translators.
Tbf, Nasuverse had a similar problem with this regarding " " representing absolute infinity in set theory but was never accepted because it wasn't explicitly mentioned in the verse bla bla. It makes no sense but it is what it is.
