Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shut updaily reminder that goku slaps fiction
Seems like he's trying to filibuster this the same way he spent months filibustering Ultima's Marvel Revisions.Find it a bit sad that DT immediately switches his target to go for low hanging fruit.
It does seem like a desperate attempt to mischaracterize Ultima in hopes of quickly changing the opinions of staff members before he has the chance to actually explain what's being targeted.
At least, that's how I see it. I definitely see where Ultima is coming from on the thread.
What does that mean?DT has just torpedoed Ultima
I put it the way I did, because that's how I understood it and for no other reason. The same way Ultima explained my arguments the way he understood them when he asked people to comment on them.Find it a bit sad that DT immediately switches his target to go for low hanging fruit.
It does seem like a desperate attempt to mischaracterize Ultima in hopes of quickly changing the opinions of staff members before he has the chance to actually explain what's being targeted.
At least, that's how I see it. I definitely see where Ultima is coming from on the thread.
The way Ultima explained it, it sure sounded like he didn't intend to require feats beyond a solid description of the nature, especially since that was what I was asking about. That Tier 0 transduality related explanation of him was several replies down on my attempt to get a straight answer from him to the questionYou forgot that what you are referring to not only doesn't change that you are LYING when you say "without any feats" but also proves that what you said["WITHOUT ANY FEATS"] is a lie, Is this ironic too?
So yeah, I presented it like I understood it. As a yes to that question. Quite frankly, I don't understand why he didn't just answer that question with a clear "no" if feats are always required.So you say that you literally suggest an omnipotence tier for any characters stated to be logically omnipotent in a not explicitly contradicted way, which they can land at without any feats, which automatically makes them superior to everyone else?
Yep,pretty much. Im pretty sure ultima said td on its own might also grant 1-ARandom question: if this CRT passes, would reality > fiction transcendence also give additional abilities like, say, Acausality (probably type 5) and Transduality? As those characters would be qualitatively superior to the lower reality's causality and duality systems.
Let’s just start that nonduality is a fake power.Abusing that everyone's talking about Transduality...
May I ask why TD is just Nonduality plus a "qualitative" (current meaning, not what Ultima clarified) superiority? Thing is that this isn't something worth noting as to a character of the same "qualitative" size the other character in question doesn't have Nonduaity to begin with.
Stuff like being immune to "inferior" stuff is already covered by the Resistance page per some changes I've made regarding smurf abilities, so this just comes off as misleading and redundant.
Shut up
No. The lower levels cannot affect the higher levels no matter what and will never be put in a battle with them.Random question: if this CRT passes, would reality > fiction transcendence also give additional abilities like, say, Acausality (probably type 5) and Transduality? As those characters would be qualitatively superior to the lower reality's causality and duality systems.
No that is not what will happen. Ultima's proposal will result in some Low 1-C's getting upgraded to 1-A.No. The lower levels cannot affect the higher levels no matter what and will never be put in a battle with them.
Expect to see a lot of 1-A characters with zero feats and almost no abilities.
Why was it even changed lmaoLet’s just start that nonduality is a fake power.
IDk Fujiwara wanted to make a niche barrier for qualitative superiorty and unbound by dual systems which is kinda redundant to play a semantics train over "exist outside and independently of" vs "transcendent"Why was it even changed lmao
Because requiring qualitative superiority was an objectively stupid decision that spit in the face of the real-life basis of the power and was ostensibly only added to make transduality/nonduality harder to get.Why was it even changed lmao
I already answered your question, thoughI don't think you guys understood what I've asked.
I mean characters of higher reality should be completely immune to any abilities of lower reality(unless maybe there is some explanation or some smurf power), otherwise its an anti-feat.I don't think you guys understood what I've asked.
....which ultimas version of 1-a covers.Just prove that someone is beyond the duality and that's enough for the QS requirement of ND Type 2.
why am i being pinged lol, idc if people have bad opinionsNo, it is not.
@Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
I mean, people are complaining about the unnecessary requirement of QS on ND page, when you simply need proof that outside of dualities + superiority or beyond dualities statements.....which ultimas version of 1-a covers.
also thats TD
That will happen. The very basis on this change is that the lower level is equivalent to nothing.No that is not what will happen. Ultima's proposal will result in some Low 1-C's getting upgraded to 1-A.
Oh don’t get me wrong. I think its fake for entirely different reasons. I am against transduality too."Nonduality is a fake power"
This is the same energy as saying that something can't be aspatial without being transcendent of space.
Which is, blatantly wrong. Abstracts aren't inherently transcendental to the reality they exist in.
In the same way, you can exist independently of certain concepts and dualities without transcending them.
Crazy take.
No, there's no page for specific concepts by nature like thatDoes this wiki have any page for transcending certain concepts?
you're a virgin because you transcend the concept of losingI transcend the concept of getting a girlfriend. It is simply irrelevant to me.
I never loseyou're a virgin because you transcend the concept of losing