• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Creator had countless aspects, avatars, incarnations, and manifestations across all of the infinite layers of existence, innumerable layers of nonexistence, and the numberless layers of transcendent reality beyond the conceptual duality and distinction between existence and nonexistence.

💀
All of this for my kittens to annihilate him beyond the very meaning of difficulty
 
this, if scp was made for powerscaling, why tf does it not have a monad

also most of scp's are literal fcking objects
That's a pretty bad argument, considering that the main distinction between 1-A transduality and tier 0 transduality is literally "things scale above this character", and SCP obviously has transdual characters. It also seems pretty common for SCPs to be tiered the way they are exclusively because they have scaling chains beyond other SCPs. That's obviously not unique to SCP, but imagine a verse that has a reputation of hype-beasting their own characters consistently to make them more and more powerful, by using prior characters as a starting point. Even if the reputation is undeserved, it's not really difficult to come to the conclusion "the only thing stopping this verse from being tier 0 is the fact that the plethora of authors writing for it want to one-up each other's characters " which nonetheless supports the notion that it's written for the purpose of powerscaling. It doesn't even have to be for VSBW powerscaling specifically. There are plenty of other tiering systems.
 
That's a pretty bad argument, considering that the main distinction between 1-A transduality and tier 0 transduality is literally "things scale above this character", and SCP obviously has transdual characters. It also seems pretty common for SCPs to be tiered the way they are exclusively because they have scaling chains beyond other SCPs. That's obviously not unique to SCP, but imagine a verse that has a reputation of hype-beasting their own characters consistently to make them more and more powerful, by using prior characters as a starting point. Even if the reputation is undeserved, it's not really difficult to come to the conclusion "the only thing stopping this verse from being tier 0 is the fact that the plethora of authors writing for it want to one-up each other's characters " which nonetheless supports the notion that it's written for the purpose of powerscaling. It doesn't even have to be for VSBW powerscaling specifically. There are plenty of other tiering systems.
Interesting paragraph.

This is a CSAP guy, everyone jump him!!
 
That's a pretty bad argument, considering that the main distinction between 1-A transduality and tier 0 transduality is literally "things scale above this character", and SCP obviously has transdual characters. It also seems pretty common for SCPs to be tiered the way they are exclusively because they have scaling chains beyond other SCPs. That's obviously not unique to SCP, but imagine a verse that has a reputation of hype-beasting their own characters consistently to make them more and more powerful, by using prior characters as a starting point. Even if the reputation is undeserved, it's not really difficult to come to the conclusion "the only thing stopping this verse from being tier 0 is the fact that the plethora of authors writing for it want to one-up each other's characters " which nonetheless supports the notion that it's written for the purpose of powerscaling. It doesn't even have to be for VSBW powerscaling specifically. There are plenty of other tiering systems.
@Sir_Ovens @Saikou_The_Lewd_King
 
Very weird. Last I checked, it was still at a positive rating, and that deletion wasn't announced in the usual thread.
Thinking about it more, that probably means it was deleted by its author. Guess we'll have to wait to see what that implies.
 
1-A revision is allowed?


 
I didn’t think Type IV Multiverses at their highest qualified for High 1-A+ . I thought it would’ve been like, Low 1-A.
I believe it was presented as an explanation. Y'know, to explain something with a simpler term. After all, the sandbox itself already says that the ultimate ensemble is Low 1-A

Just realized I read the sandbox with closed eyes☠️
Low 1-A is for Type IV Multiverses that only encompass all possible multiverse involving mathematics and dimensions and non-ontological things. High 1-A+ is Type IV Multiverses that is proven to include ontological things like Reality-Fiction and 1-A things.
 
There is about to be a huge shift in the status quo. I am very excited for this.
 
Well, the only thing I want to know is, will Yogiri become High 1-A+ via the ultimate ensemble statements in his verse or will he stay at 1-A because of the lack of other things that make up for type IV?
 
Low 1-A is for Type IV Multiverses that only encompass all possible multiverse involving mathematics and dimensions and non-ontological things. High 1-A+ is Type IV Multiverses that is proven to include ontological things like Reality-Fiction and 1-A things.
giphy.gif


Outerversal Doctor Who, here we come!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top