- 26,436
- 30,769
Send scan when he said in one shot then.>headcanon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Send scan when he said in one shot then.>headcanon
Oh, I so love when people whine about “muh downplay”
Why he's gonna say something it take him a long ass time to doSend scan when he said in one shot then.
Dude can punch at FTL speeds. It shouldn't take him that long lol.Why he's gonna say something it take him a long ass time to do
Kinda funny considering Saitama is getting that Moon level upgrade soon. Have you made that edit yet?Even if you're assuming Saitama is referring to the entire planet, destroying it wouldn't take long at all with his current ratings, let alone the upgrades that are coming.
Pulverizing the Earth without overcoming its GBE is Moon level.
It is downplay, but I don't think we're ready for that discussion.... unless?Oh, I so love when people whine about “muh downplay”
But then other series' with characters implying they are capable of destroying the earth don't even second guess when giving them "likely 5-B" ratingsEven if you're assuming Saitama is referring to the entire planet, destroying it wouldn't take long at all with his current ratings, let alone the upgrades that are coming.
Pulverizing the Earth without overcoming its GBE is Moon level.
other smaller series
Changed it lol
Saitama is vastly superior to High 6-A character, and easily delivered a 5-C blow.Vegeta is objectively superior to characters that could destroy the moon with power levels under 300, and it's repeatedly confirmed by reliable sources/the scale of the series.
Why not?Neither of those are enough.
His own feats he's vastly above. He's not far enough for it to be a big stretch.It's literally his own feats you're talking about.
When? AFAIK, he said he's not 100% reliable. We've already had a CRT to take Murata's statements case-by-case.Murata admitted his stream statements weren't even really evidence.
We're not.Y’all genuinely cannot be confused on why the CRT got closed when the OP had a single scan and that’s it.
I just explained.Why not?
It is a big stretch of thousands of times. Dragon Ball has actual guide statements (not mistranslations or anime-only versions), power levels, multipliers, and scores of characters who have scaling chains above each other.His own feats he's vastly above. He's not far enough for it to be a big stretch.
This whole statement is basically just his opinion.When? AFAIK, he said he's not 100% reliable. We've already had a CRT to take Murata's statements case-by-case.
The second half is his own opinion.This whole statement is basically just his opinion.
- A: I guess he can if he wanted to, but I don't think he will do it.
So we have Saitama being >>>> High 6-A on two occasions, and being >>>> 5-C on another, then we have him implying he can destroy the Earth, then we have Murata saying he can as well. How the hell is that not enough?It is a big stretch of thousands of times. Dragon Ball has actual guide statements (not mistranslations or anime-only versions), power levels, multipliers, and scores of characters who have scaling chains above each other.
You're literally changing the intent of his answer.“Idk I guess”
Super reliable
He says 'I', so this is his opinion.The second half is his own opinion.
Murata said that Saitama can destroy the Earth, but he just doesn't think it's in his character to do so.
So we have him being vaguely superior to two feats thousands of times lower than 5-B, one statement that can just as easily be High 6-A, and Murata's opinion.So we have Saitama being >>>> High 6-A on two occasions, and being >>>> 5-C on another, then we have him implying he can destroy the Earth, then we have Murata saying he can as well. How the hell is that not enough?
Murata's statement that is backed up by Saitama himself.Murata's opinion that he said is not reliable.
he is likely far higher already. Why are you going through all these lengths and mental gymnastics to say he's very far away when he's not?So we have him being vaguely superior
It's enough because he is already likely far higher. Saitama is not even broken a sweat preforming these feats. He does them casually, and finishes off High 6-A characters off in an instant literally. I don't understand how you can even believe this seriously.How the hell is that enough?
We can't even use Murata's opinions to begin with. So it's not back up.Murata's statement that is backed up by Saitama himself.
I'm not going through any mental gymnastics.he is likely far higher already. Why are you going through all these lengths and mental gymnastics to say he's very far away when he's not?
Likely far higher is a meaningless metric for just being vaguely above something to a high extent. None of this is based on any potential 5-B feats.It's enough because he is already likely far higher. Saitama is not even broken a sweat preforming these feats. He does them casually, and finishes off High 6-A characters off in an instant literally. I don't understand how you can even believe this seriously.
Murata get's some of the things he says from ONE. We have no way of knowing if ONE told him specifically, so that's why we take it case by case.We can't even use Murata's opinions to begin with.
We can take Saitama's word because of his prior feats, and Murata. Many other series' do it, and so should we.How can you even take Saitama's word at face value in this case?
No one was arguing that Saitama should have a solid rating. I'm arguing for a possible/likely. If I was arguing for a solid rating, ByAsura's arguments would be completely valid.It is possible to get a Possibly or Likely 5-B from this I guess (Saitama would be "At least 5-C, possibly 5-B"), but that's pretty much it, his current casual 5-C status does help a lot
We take it case-by-case, yes, and case-by-case suggests he didn't get this from ONE.Murata get's some of the things he says from ONE. We have no way of knowing if ONE told him specifically, so that's why we take it case by case.
Again, the opening of the statement alone suggest it's opinion, and the entire second half is his opinion. You're acting like he said "oh yeah, ONE believes he can destroy the Earth because of this statement from 5 years into the future, but I don't personally think he'd do it."Murata's opinion? How was it his opinion? He said that Saitama could, but he wouldn't bc its not his character. You're acting like he said, "In my opinion he could, but I'm not reliable, so don't trust me"
Murata isn't reliable in this instance.We can take Saitama's word because of his prior feats, and Murata. Many other series' do it, and so should we.
These sources aren't clear. They're incredibly murky.ByAsura, I'm going to stop debating this on this thread because this isn't getting anywhere. I'm just going to wait until a real CRT is made. If you want to keep downplaying the verse, despite the clear sources backing it up, then go ahead.
Saying "I guess," in this context is not him literally guessing. This is the same as Murata saying, "He could in theory, but he wouldn't because he has no reason to"Again, the opening of the statement alone suggest it's opinion,
Fairy Tail. Phoenix in Fairy Tail was stated to be able to destroy the world, and it makes sense because characters it should be superior to, were already High 6-A.Like what? Dragon Ball? Even the Final Fantasy statement has more backing going by the word choice "His flames are powerful enough to possibly turn the world to ashes."
The statements also have a way different context, such as remotely knowledgeable people in-universe are making the claim multiple times, the plot, and Fairy Tail has 5-A feats that these characters scale to through Laxus.Fairy Tail. Phoenix in Fairy Tail was stated to be able to destroy the world, and it's reliable because characters it should be superior to, were already High 6-A.
I didn't say he was actually guessing, it's just that the definition is used when you are saying something that you think is probably true or correct.Saying "I guess," in this context is not him literally guessing. This is the same as Murata saying, "He could in theory, but he wouldn't because he has no reason to"
Which is what it makes sense for him to be saying? Murata basically said that Saitama could, but wouldn't because it's not in character.What you're saying. It's more like 'I think he could in theory.'
I'll just agree to disagree and wait for a CRT to pop upBecause it's an opinion, a vague/likely hyperbole (one that's probably just adapted from the webcomic panel), and feats that don't support these ratings.
We need more evidence than this.