• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Even if you're assuming Saitama is referring to the entire planet, destroying it wouldn't take long at all with his current ratings, let alone the upgrades that are coming.

Pulverizing the Earth without overcoming its GBE is Moon level.
 
Even if you're assuming Saitama is referring to the entire planet, destroying it wouldn't take long at all with his current ratings, let alone the upgrades that are coming.

Pulverizing the Earth without overcoming its GBE is Moon level.
Kinda funny considering Saitama is getting that Moon level upgrade soon. Have you made that edit yet?
 
No, because we're still discussing how far Saitama should scale above it (he always holds back, after all).
 
Oh, I so love when people whine about “muh downplay”
It is downplay, but I don't think we're ready for that discussion.... unless?
https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/837121008048799764/956774961840795658/Screen_Shot_2022-03-19_at_8.24.29_PM.png
 
Even if you're assuming Saitama is referring to the entire planet, destroying it wouldn't take long at all with his current ratings, let alone the upgrades that are coming.

Pulverizing the Earth without overcoming its GBE is Moon level.
But then other series' with characters implying they are capable of destroying the earth don't even second guess when giving them "likely 5-B" ratings
 
I thought you meant OPM characters.

Vegeta is objectively superior to characters that could destroy the moon with power levels under 300, and it's repeatedly confirmed by reliable sources/the scale of the series.

You're talking about 2 statements at most (one of which is completely unreliable by Murata's own admission), and feats by himself/Boros.
 
Vegeta is objectively superior to characters that could destroy the moon with power levels under 300, and it's repeatedly confirmed by reliable sources/the scale of the series.
Saitama is vastly superior to High 6-A character, and easily delivered a 5-C blow.

Giving him 5-B when he implies he is 5-B makes sense. Especially when Murata says he can.
 
Neither of those are enough. It's literally his own feats you're talking about.

Murata admitted his stream statements weren't even really evidence.
 
I just explained.
His own feats he's vastly above. He's not far enough for it to be a big stretch.
It is a big stretch of thousands of times. Dragon Ball has actual guide statements (not mistranslations or anime-only versions), power levels, multipliers, and scores of characters who have scaling chains above each other.
When? AFAIK, he said he's not 100% reliable. We've already had a CRT to take Murata's statements case-by-case.
This whole statement is basically just his opinion.
  • A: I guess he can if he wanted to, but I don't think he will do it.
 
This whole statement is basically just his opinion.
  • A: I guess he can if he wanted to, but I don't think he will do it.
The second half is his own opinion.

Murata said that Saitama can destroy the Earth, but he just doesn't think it's in his character to do so.
It is a big stretch of thousands of times. Dragon Ball has actual guide statements (not mistranslations or anime-only versions), power levels, multipliers, and scores of characters who have scaling chains above each other.
So we have Saitama being >>>> High 6-A on two occasions, and being >>>> 5-C on another, then we have him implying he can destroy the Earth, then we have Murata saying he can as well. How the hell is that not enough?
 
The second half is his own opinion.

Murata said that Saitama can destroy the Earth, but he just doesn't think it's in his character to do so.
He says 'I', so this is his opinion.

Also, why would that mean only the second half is just his opinion?
So we have Saitama being >>>> High 6-A on two occasions, and being >>>> 5-C on another, then we have him implying he can destroy the Earth, then we have Murata saying he can as well. How the hell is that not enough?
So we have him being vaguely superior to two feats thousands of times lower than 5-B, one statement that can just as easily be High 6-A, and Murata's opinion.

How the hell is that enough?
 
How the hell is that enough?
It's enough because he is already likely far higher. Saitama is not even broken a sweat preforming these feats. He does them casually, and finishes off High 6-A characters off in an instant literally. I don't understand how you can even believe this seriously.
 
Murata's statement that is backed up by Saitama himself.
We can't even use Murata's opinions to begin with. So it's not back up.

Blowing up the Earth is way different from just threatening to destroy it in a vague way.
he is likely far higher already. Why are you going through all these lengths and mental gymnastics to say he's very far away when he's not?
I'm not going through any mental gymnastics.

Mental gymnastics is thinking two completely unreliable statements and a gap of thousands of times from some of the strongest beings in the series is more than enough.
It's enough because he is already likely far higher. Saitama is not even broken a sweat preforming these feats. He does them casually, and finishes off High 6-A characters off in an instant literally. I don't understand how you can even believe this seriously.
Likely far higher is a meaningless metric for just being vaguely above something to a high extent. None of this is based on any potential 5-B feats.

How can you even take Saitama's word at face value in this case, or simply assume that he's referring to a single punch? Why do we have any reason to believe someone who got 21 points out of 50 on his hero intelligence exam knows how much power is needed to destroy the Earth when he hasn't even come close to that level of destruction?
 
I'm pretty sure Vegeta's case is a complete different story, he stated he would blow up the Planet, yes, but there is far more to it

Similar power level characters also have feats or statements about destroying Planets, Saitama lacks this. The guide also confirms Vegeta's claim, Saitama also doesn't have this

A better example I believe is Bayonetta and Ifrit from FFXV

The first had Angels (?) being stated to he able to destroy the world, they are High 6-A. Ifrit has the statement of "reducing the Earth to ashes", the feat is listed as High 6-A aswell

It is possible to get a Possibly or Likely 5-B from this I guess (Saitama would be "At least 5-C, possibly 5-B"), but that's pretty much it, his current casual 5-C status does help a lot
 
We can't even use Murata's opinions to begin with.
Murata get's some of the things he says from ONE. We have no way of knowing if ONE told him specifically, so that's why we take it case by case.

Murata's opinion? How was it his opinion? He said that Saitama could, but he wouldn't bc its not his character. You're acting like he said, "In my opinion he could, but I'm not reliable, so don't trust me"
How can you even take Saitama's word at face value in this case?
We can take Saitama's word because of his prior feats, and Murata. Many other series' do it, and so should we.

ByAsura, I'm going to stop debating this on this thread because this isn't getting anywhere. I'm just going to wait until a real CRT is made. If you want to keep downplaying the verse, despite the clear sources backing it up, then go ahead.
 
It is possible to get a Possibly or Likely 5-B from this I guess (Saitama would be "At least 5-C, possibly 5-B"), but that's pretty much it, his current casual 5-C status does help a lot
No one was arguing that Saitama should have a solid rating. I'm arguing for a possible/likely. If I was arguing for a solid rating, ByAsura's arguments would be completely valid.
 
Murata get's some of the things he says from ONE. We have no way of knowing if ONE told him specifically, so that's why we take it case by case.
We take it case-by-case, yes, and case-by-case suggests he didn't get this from ONE.
Murata's opinion? How was it his opinion? He said that Saitama could, but he wouldn't bc its not his character. You're acting like he said, "In my opinion he could, but I'm not reliable, so don't trust me"
Again, the opening of the statement alone suggest it's opinion, and the entire second half is his opinion. You're acting like he said "oh yeah, ONE believes he can destroy the Earth because of this statement from 5 years into the future, but I don't personally think he'd do it."
We can take Saitama's word because of his prior feats, and Murata. Many other series' do it, and so should we.
Murata isn't reliable in this instance.

Prior feats that are, again, not on this level by a massive degree (especially the High 6-A feat he performed against Boros). Your reasoning is ridiculously circular.

Like what? Dragon Ball? Even the Final Fantasy statement has more backing going by the word choice "His flames are powerful enough to possibly turn the world to ashes", and yet even that's merely a possibly rating.
ByAsura, I'm going to stop debating this on this thread because this isn't getting anywhere. I'm just going to wait until a real CRT is made. If you want to keep downplaying the verse, despite the clear sources backing it up, then go ahead.
These sources aren't clear. They're incredibly murky.

At best, you are just being extremely biased.
 
Last edited:
Again, the opening of the statement alone suggest it's opinion,
Saying "I guess," in this context is not him literally guessing. This is the same as Murata saying, "He could in theory, but he wouldn't because he has no reason to"
 
Like what? Dragon Ball? Even the Final Fantasy statement has more backing going by the word choice "His flames are powerful enough to possibly turn the world to ashes."
Fairy Tail. Phoenix in Fairy Tail was stated to be able to destroy the world, and it makes sense because characters it should be superior to, were already High 6-A.
 
Saitama implied that he could destroy the Earth, and it makes sense because he is vastly superior to High 6-A characters, and preformed a 5-C feat extremely casually.
 
Fairy Tail. Phoenix in Fairy Tail was stated to be able to destroy the world, and it's reliable because characters it should be superior to, were already High 6-A.
The statements also have a way different context, such as remotely knowledgeable people in-universe are making the claim multiple times, the plot, and Fairy Tail has 5-A feats that these characters scale to through Laxus.

Before the very recent upgrades, it was Small Country level.

Quoting this page.
So this massively contradicts your point.
Saying "I guess," in this context is not him literally guessing. This is the same as Murata saying, "He could in theory, but he wouldn't because he has no reason to"
I didn't say he was actually guessing, it's just that the definition is used when you are saying something that you think is probably true or correct.

It's more like 'I think he could in theory, but it's not something he'd do in my opinion.'

There's also the fact that it's so out of character that Saitama's statement is obvious hyperbole.
 
Last edited:
What you're saying. It's more like 'I think he could in theory.'
Which is what it makes sense for him to be saying? Murata basically said that Saitama could, but wouldn't because it's not in character.

Also, how isn't this enough for a likely/possible rating?
 
He didn't basically say that Saitama could. Murata just said his belief on the matter, so it's not reliable.

Because it's an opinion, a vague/likely hyperbole (one that's probably just adapted from the webcomic panel), and feats that don't support these ratings.

We need more evidence than this.
 
Because it's an opinion, a vague/likely hyperbole (one that's probably just adapted from the webcomic panel), and feats that don't support these ratings.

We need more evidence than this.
I'll just agree to disagree and wait for a CRT to pop up
 
As astonishing as it is, it seems like "possibly 5-B Saitama" will not be accepted. But I think both statements should be mentioned in his "likely far higher" section at least
 
Back
Top