- 2,982
- 929
Frankly I don't know brocan i ask something? can we give an upscaling or something like that to collapsing star via comparing it to energy bullets?. like the range and the energy within equal range or etc?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Frankly I don't know brocan i ask something? can we give an upscaling or something like that to collapsing star via comparing it to energy bullets?. like the range and the energy within equal range or etc?
DesperationWarning! Triggering statement
16/5/2018
Murata: Orochi's disaster level is "Dragon or Above"*
T/N: The Japanese used here is いじょう, meaning "greater or equal to", i.e. ≥. Doesn't outright say God, but that's the same phrase used for Boros.
true, and Gums is just as strong as Homeless Emperor cause they are both dragon level threatsWarning! Triggering statement
16/5/2018
Murata: Orochi's disaster level is "Dragon or Above"*
T/N: The Japanese used here is いじょう, meaning "greater or equal to", i.e. ≥. Doesn't outright say God, but that's the same phrase used for Boros.
VGS is like a VR, where the characters get transported to a virtual-like world and use a virtual manifestation of their body out there.Prove "yesterday Saitama" was measured accurately. If he were just standing there, like Kuseno did with him in the webcomic, it wouldn't really be measuring his real yesterday self, but a vague passive version.
This is completely wrong.In the VGS Saitama just one shot Genos' recorded power about Saitama. Meaning Saitama wasn't one shoting his actual self but rather the version of himself that destroyed the meteor/ Carnage Kabuto in one blow, which is natural, because his normal punches scale massively above that anyway.
Damn, you was right.Murata: "Sorry, no pages this week. Have 05 Fubuki covers instead."
This is actually a pretty smart point. If there was an issue with the tech not being able to accurately measure Saitama today's and yesterdays Saitama should have been completely equal yet the later version was significantly stronger.Additionally, the recorded power by VGS was not the limit it can record, why? Because it could record "tomorrow's" Saitama punch one shotting his yesterday self. Which also supports it being analyzed correctly (if it wasn't, by the same logic "tomorrow's" Saitama wouldn't be analyzed correctly neither. But he one shotted his yesterday self, meaning the VGS machine analyzed his tomorrow self correctly enough to conclude his strength is higher than yesterday)
You can't use the anime to get a calced size, as Genos wrote down its actual dimensions in the last episode.
It seems he used the proportions of the ship from the anime rather than the dimensions. He took the dimensions from the manga. I think this is legal, because anime is more consistent in terms of object proportions and aspect ratio.You can't use the anime to get a calced size, as Genos wrote down its actual dimensions in the last episode.
That still wouldn't be allowed, as the anime has canonical dimensional sizes. You can't use it as a scaling perspective source.It seems he used the proportions of the ship from the anime rather than the dimensions.
Is this the only problem you have encountered? Still good news, since if the central structure of the calculation is correct it is a victoryThat still wouldn't be allowed, as the anime has canonical dimensional sizes. You can't use it as a scaling perspective source.
In addition the calc is a massive high ball. In the same chapter we get far better road to hole scaling perspectives and the craters are not 4 kilometers in diameter
No, because you're using an out of focus background shot and got a hyper inflated crater size.since if the central structure of the calculation is correct it is a victory
Huh, and also not all roads are the same sizeIn addition the calc is a massive high ball. In the same chapter we get far better road to hole scaling perspectives and the craters are not 4 kilometers in diameter
I mean another calculation has already been accepted using these panels, and apparently that calculation was only changed because they found a better alternative wayNo, because you're using an out of focus background shot and got a hyper inflated crater size.
I mean, they're roads. The paint on them would be similar in size if nothing else and the lines also don't imply 4 kilometer wide craters.Huh, and also not all roads are the same size
If this happens the other argument could be he kept his future growth as we actually have no proof he lost that in the first placeThough if Saitama casually one shots Empty Void like he did in the WC despite all his cosmic powers, I'll do myself a CRT to add that to Saitama's profile, and additionally I'd remove some Normal Punch scaling you all know about
I mean in the panel you presented the focus seems to be on the hero association as a whole, I don't think Murata was too focused on showing the craters in said panelI mean, they're roads. The paint on them would be similar in size if nothing else and the lines also don't imply 4 kilometer wide craters.
Your example is the reflected background image of a panel. It's not better.mean in the panel you presented the focus seems to be on the hero association as a whole
I know it has nothing to do but can you answer my next question? I understand that to have Acausality 5 you must be someone impossible to interact with. My question is: if, for example, there is a 2-C being with Acausality 5 in a verse, and then a 1-A character is presented who sees that same character as fiction, will this 1-A character automatically be granted Aca 5? Or should this 1-A guy prove having Aca 5 in the respective meta-qualitative layer in which he is located?Your example is the reflected background image of a panel. It's not better.
Well in the panel where the crater appears Sitch is looking directly outside during the discussion, you can see that there is a focus on the crater in the panel compared to the road, different from the panel where you showed where the focus was on the hero associationYour example is the reflected background image of a panel. It's not better.
and then we scale opm sonic to Archie Pre-Genesis Sonic, which would conclude in 1-C saitamaJust had a thought about it, but it would've been funny if Sonic got a monster form from Orochi's cell and it was a blue hedgehog form. would also make sense with how he refused to join Nintendo (Heavenly Ninja Party)
its about strength
This graph is official right? Is the infinite talking about growth or strength what is the official translation
Wait what's triggering about thisWarning! Triggering statement
16/5/2018
Murata: Orochi's disaster level is "Dragon or Above"*
T/N: The Japanese used here is いじょう, meaning "greater or equal to", i.e. ≥. Doesn't outright say God, but that's the same phrase used for Boros.
he thinks that this would prove orochi is equal to boros. I already showed why its a flawed logicWait what's triggering about this
I mean, we all know Murata said Orochi's 'above dragon'. It just means that Orochi's ability to delete a chunk of the planet puts him above a certain threshold that Boros also crosses- they could be comparable or they could be 'above dragons' in the same sense that Bakuzan and Elder Centipede are both dragons.he thinks that this would prove orochi is equal to boros. I already showed why its a flawed logic
Due to R>F changes they would be immune to anything lower than them, as they'd be treated as fictional entities. They'd only have Acasual 5 if they're Acasual in the Meta-Fictional realm.My question is: if, for example, there is a 2-C being with Acausality 5 in a verse, and then a 1-A character is presented who sees that same character as fiction, will this 1-A character automatically be granted Aca 5?
God level threats can destroy the Earth going by Blast, CF Garou and Void. So until they reach that threshold they're just Dragons.I mean, we all know Murata said Orochi's 'above dragon'. It just means that Orochi's ability to delete a chunk of the planet puts him above a certain threshold that Boros also crosses- they could be comparable or they could be 'above dragons' in the same sense that Bakuzan and Elder Centipede are both dragons.
Holy crap! Are you ok?!Guys i know this is not place to talk about this….
But the situation here is starting to get out of control and the international media is not helping us that much. Please inform yourselves about Rio Grande do Sul - Brazil. The biggest disaster in the history of our country is actually happening. Donations, sharing, talking to your friends, everything can save lives… Local media is hiding from us, but we citizens have estimated that more than 10 thousand people have already died… Too many corpses floating in the water, dead animals, an entire state was destroyed.
And the rain did not stop yet…
I think it's up to you to convince people that your "common sense" is more correct than their "common sense." If you can't do that, then too bad.That's their problem then. Should have said people with an IQ above 5.
If you think you can reason with those guys, then you clearly haven't been around here. Trust me many others have tried reasoning with them, but nothing gets through their thick head including I, when I still used to be so active here.I think it's up to you to convince people that your "common sense" is more correct than their "common sense." If you can't do that, then too bad.
Someone who thinks Metal Bat is faster than Flashy Flash shouldn't be talking. If you think believing those arguments isn't foolish, then that's your problem.Saying people that disagree with you have "low IQ" says more about you than about them tbf