- 2,500
- 2,102
That's a last stand, not a tantrum.
Both contribute to the overall evilness of a person though. Admittedly, I misunderstood some of your arguments from before so we are in a more agreeable position than I initially thought. But it doesn't change what Boros did.
Indeed. If you go back to my first comment about the matter, I already acknowledged that there are probably many who are far worse out there.
That said, the key word is "could" when it comes to Fuhrer Ugly. He doesn't look for a battle the same way Boros does so he wouldn't actively destroy planets like him. I can imagine him doing it for just sake of doing it one or two times but he would much rather enslave a species to live like a king.
Having a different set of morals would alienate it from conventional good and evil as humans call it. It is just Blue and Orange morality. Otherwise, monsters would be saints since rampaging is just in their nature.
That aside, while his species not having empathy at all is possible, it is not an argument.
First of all, Boros still had no reason to destroy entire civilizations when it wasn't necessary to find a worthy warrior.
Secondly, that kind of argument is kind of similar to the Slothful Induction fallacy. Just because another result is possible doesn't mean that it is true. That's especially true when so many other things point otherwise:
1) It would make things needlessly complicated and doesn't suit ONE's style at all. Heck, literally everyone, including Boros, is talking Japanese in this series just for convenience.
2) Boros being sapient and his range of emotions would make it extremely unlikely for him lack the concept of empathy. He also seems to show empathy when it comes to Saitama.
3) Boris' existence.
Yeah, but it is easier when we are talking individual characters. If you want to talk about full-blown morality, then the books written about the matter would easily double this whole thread.
