• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Yeah a God profile can probably be made already. He should have all the abilities Garou had due to his Cosmic Mode.
 
2.I'm not sure if it says that the punch was delivered before the action of the punch occurs, that is making the effect (the punch) happen before the cause (saitama hitting)
You're making the feat sound more simple and flexible than it is. Since Saitama never had a drawn out fight with Garou, Garou never helped him travel back in time, so the punch he gave Garou couldn't have possibly happened. It's a happenstance of semantics, Saitama is not directly manipulating causality.

The most you can have is "Limited Causality Manipulation via time travel".
 
You're making the feat sound more simple and flexible than it is. Since Saitama never had a drawn out fight with Garou, Garou never helped him travel back in time, so the punch he gave Garou couldn't have possibly happened. It's a happenstance of semantics, Saitama is not directly manipulating causality.

The most you can have is "Limited Causality Manipulation via time travel".
better than not have that
 
2. why does it have to be specifically a feat all the time? because it can't be the staments or something like that, not always the feat,because the feat is more powerful than the stament of someone
What statements are there though? The inner universe thing is not a feat at all.

Can you give my anything suggesting Universal. Because I sure can't, there's nothing to support universal
 
That doesn't mean anything though? And just because she said he looked like the structural diagram of the universe doesn't mean he created it.
why? it was made clear that god is clearly the creator of the opm universe, it would not make sense for him to be someone else
blast say that him and garou cosmic fear mode can control the reality of the cosmos,Garou has the knowledge of all the energy of the cosmos and its forces (don't ask me because time is a force of the universe)and his body is a enteir cosmos,there is even a constellation that is the constellation of the hunter (reference).
Garou's body isn't asthetic or anything, since it was shown that even Garou can have all the energy of the cosmos and its forces in it.
which is reflected in his body.
wait for a databook to say that it has the power of the entire cosmos and then you deny it (like the planetary boros, but let's not start)
 
why? it was made clear that god is clearly the creator of the opm universe, it would not make sense for him to be someone else
blast say that him and garou cosmic fear mode can control the reality of the cosmos,Garou has the knowledge of all the energy of the cosmos and its forces (don't ask me because time is a force of the universe)and his body is a enteir cosmos,there is even a constellation that is the constellation of the hunter (reference).
God being able to know everything doesn't indicate he's the creator. Unless we have an actual statement of GOD creating the universe, then he won't be listed as universal.

wait for a databook to say that it has the power of the entire cosmos and then you deny it (like the planetary boros, but let's not start)
What has Boros got to do with anything?
 
Planetary Boros is wrong so ig that was an example of a bad guidebook statement? Idk what he was trying to say either.
Why? If it was only said that it could destroy the planet, in the original it said destroy the surface
it doesn't seem so illogical to assume that it could destroy the planet
 
a graph with no units of measurement shown on either axis
Why did so many people like this lol? You can very easily get what the units on the y axis are by looking at what it is when x=0 (i.e, Saitama's power level just before Garou copied him at the end of 167) and you can get what time (or time relative to Saitama's perception, I'd argue) increments on the x axis represent by looking at the gapes between the nodes.
 
And? The profile is meant to show Garou going from his initial 5-A/High 4-C, up to his 4-A stats later on right?

Is that not how we're labeling Garou? Are we just ignoring his initial strength when he appeared and only using his end of fight stuff?

Are we saying he gets weaker if he isn't in Mode Saitama or doing that power mimicry? I don't agree with that.
It call being stonewall aka Durability is highly than AP
 
Back
Top