Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're making the feat sound more simple and flexible than it is. Since Saitama never had a drawn out fight with Garou, Garou never helped him travel back in time, so the punch he gave Garou couldn't have possibly happened. It's a happenstance of semantics, Saitama is not directly manipulating causality.2.I'm not sure if it says that the punch was delivered before the action of the punch occurs, that is making the effect (the punch) happen before the cause (saitama hitting)
That should give resistance to extreme cold
These are the only two they should get...During the time travel scene they blatantly show subatomic matter manipulation
better than not have thatYou're making the feat sound more simple and flexible than it is. Since Saitama never had a drawn out fight with Garou, Garou never helped him travel back in time, so the punch he gave Garou couldn't have possibly happened. It's a happenstance of semantics, Saitama is not directly manipulating causality.
The most you can have is "Limited Causality Manipulation via time travel".
Where does it said that god would cross the expansive time in the scan that you linked?it was said in one of the ancient runes in the center of the earth, that god would cross the expansive time.
i don't know about this,we can use it?at least take it into consideration
in the chapter when saitama fight against orochi in the center of the earthWhere does it said that god would cross the expansive time in the scan that you linked?
Could you link it then? I don't remember what chapter that was?in the chapter when saitama fight against orochi in the center of the earth
It's something every time traveler can do, unless you're in one of those screwy verses like Marvel where you can't go back in time without creating a new timeline.better than not have that
What statements are there though? The inner universe thing is not a feat at all.2. why does it have to be specifically a feat all the time? because it can't be the staments or something like that, not always the feat,because the feat is more powerful than the stament of someone
That doesn't mean anything though? And just because she said he looked like the structural diagram of the universe doesn't mean he created it.
https://**********/read/gist/OPM/112/19/Could you link it then? I don't remember what chapter that was?
why? it was made clear that god is clearly the creator of the opm universe, it would not make sense for him to be someone elseThat doesn't mean anything though? And just because she said he looked like the structural diagram of the universe doesn't mean he created it.
God being able to know everything doesn't indicate he's the creator. Unless we have an actual statement of GOD creating the universe, then he won't be listed as universal.why? it was made clear that god is clearly the creator of the opm universe, it would not make sense for him to be someone else
blast say that him and garou cosmic fear mode can control the reality of the cosmos,Garou has the knowledge of all the energy of the cosmos and its forces (don't ask me because time is a force of the universe)and his body is a enteir cosmos,there is even a constellation that is the constellation of the hunter (reference).
What has Boros got to do with anything?wait for a databook to say that it has the power of the entire cosmos and then you deny it (like the planetary boros, but let's not start)
I said don't talk about borosGod being able to know everything doesn't indicate he's the creator. Unless we have an actual statement of GOD creating the universe, then he won't be listed as universal.
What has Boros got to do with anything?
Planetary Boros is wrong so ig that was an example of a bad guidebook statement? Idk what he was trying to say either.What has Boros got to do with anything?
Boros fan aren't allowed to win (They like a mid character)Planetary Boros is wrong so ig that was an example of a bad guidebook statement? Idk what he was trying to say either.
As long as there is a reference to the audiobook/direct link to it (like the in-training Saitama>Tatsumaki scan), it's good imo
Why? If it was only said that it could destroy the planet, in the original it said destroy the surfacePlanetary Boros is wrong so ig that was an example of a bad guidebook statement? Idk what he was trying to say either.
Why did so many people like this lol? You can very easily get what the units on the y axis are by looking at what it is when x=0 (i.e, Saitama's power level just before Garou copied him at the end of 167) and you can get what time (or time relative to Saitama's perception, I'd argue) increments on the x axis represent by looking at the gapes between the nodes.a graph with no units of measurement shown on either axis
Sorry to interrupt but time is not a force. It is a dimension, and thus the bedrock or framework on which such forces are built on.
Sorry to interrupt but time is not a force. It is a dimension, and thus the bedrock or framework on which such forces are built on.
Idk, maybe OPM wiki has that informationwhen did the first databook come out?
ok(no,there is nothing)Idk, maybe OPM wiki has that information
why?When will a databook on this arc even be made lol?
That doesn't make sense as a response.why?
sorry,i got confuseThat doesn't make sense as a response.
It call being stonewall aka Durability is highly than APAnd? The profile is meant to show Garou going from his initial 5-A/High 4-C, up to his 4-A stats later on right?
Is that not how we're labeling Garou? Are we just ignoring his initial strength when he appeared and only using his end of fight stuff?
Are we saying he gets weaker if he isn't in Mode Saitama or doing that power mimicry? I don't agree with that.
has always hadIs Saitama getting enhanced Senses from hearing God¿
I think it's ESP. Extra confirmation for Saitama being able to hear telepathy
He couldn't hear God without the transmission boxI think it's ESP. Extra confirmation for Saitama being able to hear telepathy
True, as he has no mouthgod always speak by telepathy
I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here.Why? If it was only said that it could destroy the planet, in the original it said destroy the surface
it doesn't seem so illogical to assume that it could destroy the planet