• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

STRONGEST One-Punch Man Discussion Thread!

ByAsura said:
The current calc isn't based on the parameters that multiple galaxies were destroyed, though, so I don't see why that's relevant.
Click to expand...
It doesn't matter tbh. It's like calcs that rate someone as Low 7-C because they destroyed a building. Which has happened before on this wiki, a single building being destroyed was calced to have a bigger number than Hiroshima, where several buildings were pulverized.

At some point you have to step back and realize that maybe you're calcing it wrong
 
Cryo123 said:
"The point I’m trying to make is that the current calculation is labeling 11 million stars as multi galaxy."
Click to expand...
When you write a book report there’s a reason a teacher will fail you if you just copy and paste the book word for word into your essay. In your own words put together a clear and concise description of my argument. Because I don’t think you understand what I am trying to say.
 
Matthew_Schroeder said:
It doesn't matter tbh. It's like calcs that rate someone as Low 7-C because they destroyed a building. Which has happened before on this wiki, a single building being destroyed was calced to have a bigger number than Hiroshima, where several buildings were pulverized.

At some point you have to step back and realize that maybe you're calcing it wrong
Click to expand...
I mean if they destroyed that building with a shockwave from kilometers away, it makes sense.
 
Matthew_Schroeder said:
It doesn't matter tbh. It's like calcs that rate someone as Low 7-C because they destroyed a building. Which has happened before on this wiki, a single building being destroyed was calced to have a bigger number than Hiroshima, where several buildings were pulverized.

At some point you have to step back and realize that maybe you're calcing it wrong
Click to expand...
His calc probably is wrong
 
DTG499 said:
When you write a book report there’s a reason a teacher will fail you if you just copy and paste the book word for word into your essay.
Click to expand...
I simply thought you were trying to put me in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" scenario. Where no matter what I say, it either has me concede to your argument, or you get to pick apart the slight discrepancies in my description of your argument. I know how english essays work.
 
And also, if you ever got an A in one of those essays, you'd know you have to quote the book to prove and support your interpretation/undertsanding of the text.
 
Cryo123 said:
I simply thought you were trying to put me in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" scenario. Where no matter what I say, it either has me concede to your argument, or you get to pick apart the slight discrepancies in my description of your argument. I know how english essays work.
Click to expand...
I believe that a 3-B rating is warranted, I want a 3-B rating for one punch man. I do not believe this is the way to get to it.
 
Cryo123 said:
I mean if they destroyed that building with a shockwave from kilometers away, it makes sense.
Click to expand...
No it was just destroying the building. People realized it was weird and it was revised. Calcs can be inflated through method just as they can be through assumptions.
 
Not a calc guy but I’m just gonna drop that tiers aren’t based on if you destroy the thing in the name or not, it’s about the energy output
if math says that destroying something smaller than a galaxy is as high as the arbitrary value the wiki put for galaxy level then so be it.
 
Ok let’s start over. What are the major differences that separate this calc from all the other 4-A and above calcs?
 
That’s what I meant by moving the goal post if we apply the neutron star calcs 4-A, 3-C, 3-B and 3-A calcs could all get potentially upgraded.
 
LordGinSama said:
Tatsumaki is hot.

That's all.
Click to expand...
e1c69ebb1bcc9e8b319e584abe4b61a9.gif
OIP.Vx76GybNRGk4hwq4YHK5SwHaFK
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

TyranoDoom30
OPM profiles possible renaming
Replies
5
Views
3K
Recon1511
Recon1511
Kachon123
One-Punch Man: Genos Profile Rework
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
WizardPowers101
Kachon123
One-Punch Man: Adding Willpower to Some Profiles
Replies
12
Views
2K
Kachon123
Kachon123
Phoenks
  • Locked
"Possibly" 3-C Saitama
2 3 4
Replies
149
Views
17K
Phoenks
Phoenks
Marvel_Champion_07
Low 7-B Puri-Puri Prisoner
Replies
23
Views
2K
Marvel_Champion_07
Marvel_Champion_07
Back
Top