Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That not how it exactly workThe calc itself stated that about 11 million starts were destroyed even though there are over 100 billion stars in our galaxy.
11 million stars destroyed would be 4-A
All interstellar feats are MFTLWould the speed of destruction not buff results? This did happen rather quickly.
That doesn't answer my questionAll interstellar feats are MFTL
Why? Just curiousSpeed is irrelevant in this case.
Meaning the yield always ends up being the same because in order to cross those distances in the first place you need to be incredibly fast.That doesn't answer my question
For this calc? I don’t think soHmmm well does the math check out?
How does 11 million stars destroyed equal 3-B when a single galaxy has 100 billion stars?The destruction of distant stars in any case uses the inverse square law.
I don't understand what's wrong with the math?
ThisYes, I agree with this. It is worth repeating the same scenario as with a serious blow, Gaia Cannon and other calculations, when we took different calculations for the same feat from different participants and chose the best one.
By the way, could someone throw a link to the 4-A version? There was also a KE of a serious table.
I don't want to sound rude, but I think you didn't read the message above well. Destruction of something by a shock wave at a distance >>> destruction of this object, because with distance the force becomes less. Having received the energy that reached the edge of the attack, with the help of a shock wave, we calculated the energy at the epicenter.How does 11 million stars destroyed equal 3-B when a single galaxy has 100 billion stars?
Because the measurement of the yield is based upon the number of stars destroyed and the distance.I don't want to sound rude, but I think you didn't read the message above well. Destruction of something by a shock wave at a distance >>> destruction of this object, because with distance the force becomes less. Having received the energy that reached the edge of the attack, with the help of a shock wave, we calculated the energy at the epicenter.
After the same nuclear explosions, we have many buildings left relatively intact a couple of kilometers from the explosion. However, you can't say that the power of a nuclear bomb is less than a city, because it destroyed only a lot of buildings?
How about the saitama ping pong calc?Either that, or we change our 3-B standards.
Let's wait for a thread.
Don’t we already take that into account for 4-A feats? If we don’t that would just move the goal post for 4-A feats and above it wouldn’t turn a 4-A feat into a 3-B feat.The bottom line is that the GBE of a neutron star is at the same level as the baseline of the solar system.
Okay, it wasn't as hard as I thought
Saitama and Garou are hurting the cosmos
vsbattles.fandom.com
more cosmic garou questions
would he be able to copy something like the ability to access speedforce? The ability to see stands? Being able to master techniques like kaioken?
Stand
yesIsn’t the speed force higher d?
... stand seeing isnt a biological trait stuff anymore? Like, its more of a ghost shtick nowadays, P8 even makes clear on that. so wdymok so in terms of kaio ken, it functions through ki control, and ki Prob does fall under universal energies, seeing as its life energy. So I’d say yeah.
Stand seeing is a “biological trait“ I suppose, as you Ordinarily need a virus to get a stand, and thus see one. If he can copy traits like, seeing in extra colors or amphibious skin, then I’d say yeah. Otherwise no.
And jsut checked, speed force higher d so no on that.
He won tow matches I made.. when he was moon levelOh, I didn't see any on his profile