Strongest most iconic character rivality: Doctor Doom Vs. Superman

[Bobsican]

Let´s see who´s the strongest character in the wiki that´s also iconic

Both at High 1-B, speed not equalized.

I know 1-A matches are normally restricted, but as they are quite comparable, there´s no need to apply the rule here, otherwise, this can just change to their High 1-B alternatives

Edit: Originally a 1-A match, but as 1-A is undergoing revisions with the tier 0 thing, the best is to just stick to something else.

Anyways...

The superhero that solos your verse

The doctor that solos your verse

Votes so far:

Superman: 2 (Jared1111, ABoogieYesSir)

Doc Doom: 0

Incon: 0


I have to stop you


Hahahahaha!

 

[Schnee_One]

Doom absorbs

 

[Bobsican]

Plot manip GG

Also, ADAPT

 

[Jared1111]

The amount of bullshit hax, meta bullshit, and overall wankery being thrown around is enough to tank both companies in a wave of pure WTFery.

But i think Cosmic Armor does have an edge with Adaption and Plot Manipulation (though Doom does have it as well, but it's a smaller scale i think) but Doom's Fate Manipulation could help out. Close but i'd go for CA FRA.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

Good luck absorbing someone with plot manipualtion that works on type 5 acasuals

 

[Schnee_One]

Type 5?

You mean Type 4?

 

[Wokistan]

1-A matches aren't banned but they don't get added so why not just use the High 1-Bs

 

[Schnee_One]

IIRC CA gets stomped by the beyonders

Here at least both are baseline p

 

[Crimson_Azoth]

The superhero/doctor that solos your verse?

MUHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

Type 5?
You mean Type 4?

No

Mandrakk is type 5 acasual and superman plotted him

 

[Schnee_One]

Do you have any proof it worked?

 

[Wokistan]

Well yeah, they're 1-As. Type 5 means basically nothing without any further explanation anyways, and pretty sure the defintition here is abalagous to "is high 1-B/1-A".

 

[Setsuna_tenma]

Type 5 acauality is useless in 1B to 1A

 

[Wokistan]

Manfrakk also doesn't even have that on the file.

 

[Schnee_One]

Pop pop watching wankthens drop

 

[Bobsican]

1-A matches aren't banned but they don't get added so why not just use the High 1-Bs

Why not for this case? Unlike other 1-A matches, they are pretty comparable in power levels.

 

[Wokistan]

Doesn't really matter, adding this and not the others is inconsistent. You can still debate it if you like, but it's jot going on profiles.

 

[Udlmaster]

I'm pretty sure baseline, all Teir 1-A are outside Causality in most senses.

 

[Bobsican]

Doesn't really matter, adding this and not the others is inconsistent. You can still debate it if you like, but it's jot going on profiles.

Not if there´s an actual reason to be allowed to do so.

The reason it isn´t normally allowed is because debates often turn into borderline inconclusive because 1-A is a thing hard to grasp for most users.

In this case, they are comparable in stats, so there is no reason to not add the match when it´s done.

 

[Wokistan]

Because its inconsistent with other 1-A matchups. A 1-A matchup that was on profiles for a while, meaning it must have been considered fair enough, was removed to stay consistent. Since this is a 1-A match, its not gonna get added.

 

[Bobsican]

Consistent? There are no rules regarding that just for "consistency".

A CRT would be appreciated.

 

[Wokistan]

No bob as in rules have to be applied consistently. There is a rule against the addition of 1-A matches, and as such we don't add 1-A matches. Making an exception is inconsistent, which is antithetical to the idea of rules.

You can try to get the rule itself changed or removed if you want, but now's not a great time.

 

[Bobsican]

Why it´s not a great time?

 

[Wokistan]

Because we're in the middle of changes to tier 0 and High 1-A, and having something as trivial as this going on at the same time is probably not going to get answered.

 

[Bobsican]

If it´s so trivial, shouldn´t it be even easier to answer?

Eh, I´ll just change it to the High 1-B ones then, it likely would go the exact same way, so all the current votes are even still valid.

 

[ABoogieYesSir]

Thot robot FRA

 

[Schnee_One]

Thot robot FRA

There aren't any

 

[Bobsican]

Thot robot FRA

There aren't any

Thought ROBOT