- 2,648
- 644
What rule?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Stormbreaker Upgrade (I promise this one isn't bad🙏)
- Status
- 20,541
- 17,454
- 3,803
- 2,247
- Thread starter
- #43
Well we need more staff opinions
- 2,648
- 644
What that’s not a rule and can’t be a rule as we know the gauntlet scales above the level of that blast is irrelevant and holds no weight on stormbreaker actual strength
- 3,803
- 2,247
- Thread starter
- #45
"Look at how powerful this axe (Stormbreaker) is. The man who made the Gauntlet and the axe, provided Thor with the weapon that could defeat the Gauntlet."
The main problem is that we don't know how much energy was used during the blas, so at best we can upgrade Stormbreaker to 5-A, likely far higher
- 3,803
- 2,247
- Thread starter
- #46
If you can prove that the director was the one commenting on the video u sent earlier, this would change everything tho
- 3,803
- 2,247
- Thread starter
- #47
Mb I made a grammar mistake
- 2,648
- 644
The main problem is again that’s irrelevant as I’ve already shown numerous wog says it above
- 2,648
- 644
The one commenting on the video is literally The Russo bros my guys it was the director watch a along
- 3,803
- 2,247
- Thread starter
- #50
Can you prove the director was the one commenting on the video u sent a few minutes ago. If its the director who was commenting on it and not the screenwriter this would change everything
- 3,803
- 2,247
- Thread starter
- #51
Can u send the original interview?
- 2,648
- 644
My guy go to Disney + and select the director watch a long no I can’t send you a full movie
Russo bros did a watch along for both Iw and endgame and it’s on Disney + if you want to see it
- 3,803
- 2,247
- Thread starter
- #53
Well if the director himself implies the Stormbreaker would scale to the gauntlet, this would counter everyone else counter arguments and agree with the OP
- 2,648
- 644
I already countered their arguments
Not a single person has anything on the 6+ wog that says it scales stormbreaker has 0 anti feats there is no debunk
- 20,541
- 17,454
It's already been rejected. The topic, barring a staff thread, is ended CRT wise.
- 2,648
- 644
Nope y’all can’t reject if you can’t debunk
Not a single person has provided anything relevant or would count as a debunk the best y’all could come up with was a scan you and the other guy couldn’t even read and debunks yourself by reading it
- 2,648
- 644
I like how not a single person can actually debunk it and just say nah it’s rejected
This is what me and the lloyd guy were talking about at this rate this site or at least for mcu side needs new mods because the mods clearly don’t even act like mods when they don’t want to read discuss or are open to having their minds changed
Actually a joke
This is what me and the lloyd guy were talking about at this rate this site or at least for mcu side needs new mods because the mods clearly don’t even act like mods when they don’t want to read discuss or are open to having their minds changed
Actually a joke
- 20,541
- 17,454
It was debunked, or at least reasoning for not using the scaling was brought up in both threads and rejected by all the staff members who commented.
Just because you're not satisfied with the responses doesn't mean it wasn't rejected or considered unusable.
- 9,881
- 12,887
I read the OP and responded with my reasoning. I even replied to Lloyd's direct reply to me. We also provided the discussion rule
Also, mods aren't assigned to different verses. You can't get "new mods for the MCU side". Mods are meant to cover key aspects of the wiki overall
- 2,648
- 644
Yeah and everything you said still doesn’t debunk anything
how ever the mods work we need new ones who are active on mcu side because if a mod hops in threads and says nah I’m not going to read then disagree without reading then that’s wack
- 9,881
- 12,887
But it did debunk it. The argument of the OP is scaling to the Power Stone and I addressed how the Power Stone's attack potency is dependant on the target. Ergo, there's no reason to assume a 3-A blast was used
That's a debunk. You can disagree if you want, but it is a debunk
What are you talking about? Mods are super active with the MCU, its arguably in our top 5 most active verses on the wiki
- 2,648
- 644
It wasn’t debunked now your making stuff up
Everything you said or that’s been said here hasn’t debunked anything like y’all can’t even debunk it in the first place as stormbreaker has 0 anti feats going against it
- 2,648
- 644
Bro what not I’m talking about I’m saying how stormbreaker is that strong that isn’t debunked because op used some flawed method doesn’t debunk stormbreaker itself only the way he argued it
I’m saying the ones are active need to be replaced? Not hard to understand if a mod ever says he ain’t reading or doesn’t feel like reading a crt then disagrees they shouldn’t even count
- 9,881
- 12,887
I'm really confused at where you're going with this. The Power Stone is the sole reasoning in the OP's argument. What I addressed is perfectly on topic
We never count votes from mods who say "I ain't reading all that". If a mod agrees, we count it. If they disagree, we count it. Simple as that
- 2,648
- 644
I’m saying stormbreaker still scales not because how ever the op tried to get it there but because of other reasons which are already mentioned in the thread
Yes y’all do that literally happened last thread 98% of the people who disagree never actually address anything and just say disagree
- 9,881
- 12,887
At this point, I'm genuinely confused on which side you're arguing for. First it sounds like you're agreeing with Lloyd, and then you take shots at his proposal
Wh- Literally no....? I'm not sure you've been on the wiki long enough, you're saying stuff that really isn't seen on a consistent basis anymore
- 1,279
- 356
He didn't say it was the most powerful weapon. And even if he did, it can't be used to scale over 6 stones.
The plan was to give Thor a weapon that could defeat the Gauntlet, not a weapon that could defeat the six infinity stones
This supports what I am saying. If Thanos doesn't know the power of what's coming at him, he doesn't need to attack at full power, he just attacks with as much power as he thinks is enough.Another case of people not being able to read their own scans
In a different way this is telling us thanos could’ve used the stone another way rather then raw power like using the space stone to open a portal using the reality stone or time hax etc not raw power
Meaning Stormbreaker > IG ap
"Look at how powerful this axe (Stormbreaker) is. The man who made the Gauntlet and the axe, provided Thor with the weapon that could defeat the Gauntlet."
Again, a weapon that can beat the Gauntlet. Not a weapon that can defeat 6 infinity stones.
And you have not even responded to my counter-arguments.
- 3,803
- 2,247
- Thread starter
- #68
Ye but the director proof he sent furthermore supports the OP so yall should take into consideration + not enough mod replies to close/reject this thread
- 3,803
- 2,247
- Thread starter
- #69
The Gauntlet still scale to Uni tho pretty sure
- 9,881
- 12,887
I'm gonna refer you to ByArrow's recent reply, since they cover my thoughts on some of the "support" and I don't wanna just reiterate what they said
- 9,881
- 12,887
It is not. The Gauntlet by itself has no 3-A durability feats
- 2,648
- 644
he did ??? This has to be one of the worst cases I’ve ever see he literally said it’s the greatest weapon ever made if you just click play on the video I sent you could listen and realize that
Yeah and you know what the gauntlet uses the infinity stones like your blowing my mind right now man
No it doesn’t and In fact debunks what your saying it’s saying Thanos couldn’t of counters it through raw power rather other ways like hax nobody is arguing stormbreaker no sells every hax the gauntlet hax only ap or raw power
Can you stop spouting nonsense first one of the scans I sent explicitly called it the infinity gauntlet 2nd of all the director is literally watching the axe overpowere the IG what do you think he’s talking about bud use common sense here
But considering your lack of ability to read scans or even listen to a short 8 second clip I doubt anything your arguing has any relevance
Deleted member 11410
Guest
Also by scaling Stormbreaker that doesn't also make regular Thanos scaling to full gauntlet? Like, makes no sense..
- 2,648
- 644
Fr no it doesn’t what logic did you get that from Thanos doesn’t scale to the stormbreaker he literally got his head chopped off and had to actively avoid getting hit in endgame so he wasn’t killed
Last edited by a moderator:
- 1,279
- 356
the greatest weapon is not the same as the most powerful weapon. Even if it does, it can only be used to scale onto weapons made within the verse. Unless you're saying that the gauntlet alone is as powerful as the infinity stones, it's useless.
This doesn't change anything
He doesn't say he couldn't stop it with raw power, he says he could have stopped it if he used it differently. He may also be talking about finger snapping here.
Calling it an infinity gauntlet does not put the gauntlet itself on the same level as the infinity stones.
As I mentioned in my previous messages, the gauntlet was not being used to six stone's full power.
None of the scans you and the OP gave are sufficient for what you are intend for. And You are insulting everyone who says this.
And you still haven't responded to my previous counter arguments.
- 2,648
- 644
It is like your logic is blowing my mind he was asked how did it survive all 6 infinity his reply greatest weapon ever made which is consistent with all the other statements of being able to beat the infinity gauntlet
More nonsense from the guy who can’t read a scan or listen to an 8 second clip
Nobody is saying the gauntlet is as powerful as the stones themselves bruh like nobody says ultron is as powerful as stones the stones themselves the stones are what powers them the device it’s self is never equal to the stones it doesn’t have to be to draw out it’s power which is shown time and tome again
Yes the scans I gave are sufficient enough I provided multiple wog saying it has the power to beat the gauntlet it’s a stronger weapon then the gauntlet etc nothing you said or anyone here has been able to debunk and can actually address it because y’all can’t stormbreaker has 0 anti feats meaning until it gets one it can’t be debunked
Also you have no arguments I didn’t counter I’ve already replied to them and explained how you can’t even read your own scans
- 1,279
- 356
He did not say that it was survive because it was stronger than the stones. Also, in that scene, Thanos was not attacking with the full power of the stones.
And insult again
Unless you're saying the gauntlet is as powerful as the stones, weapon statements that can defeat the gauntlet cannot be used to scale to the infinity stones and will be invalid.
WoGs don't directly say that it are stronger than infinity stones. Unless you're saying the gauntlet is as powerful as the stones, weapon statements that can defeat the gauntlet cannot be used to scale to the infinity stones and will be invalid. And just because strombreaker doesn't have an anti-feat doesn't mean this OP can't be debunked.
You haven't debunk anything in this message
- 3,803
- 2,247
- Thread starter
- #79
Remember the gauntlet was made to channel the Infinity Stones power, so it scales
- 9,881
- 12,887
No, no it doesn't. Thats not how it works, Lloyd. It does not scale. At best, it upscales Vibranium via being made of Uru
Last edited:
- Status
