Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
Still you know a cartoon. They have pretty much similar rules like with Popeye and other similar stuff.bugs bunny is also from a different fuc-king cartoon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still you know a cartoon. They have pretty much similar rules like with Popeye and other similar stuff.bugs bunny is also from a different fuc-king cartoon
In bugs' case he's actually got more then one uni and uni+ feat!Bugs bunny is literally Universe level and he avoids gun shots and knifes.
Mods he said cuss word, crush his balls.bugs bunny is also from a different fuc-king cartoon
No they don't, LT has a whole ass accepted power page that canonizes what you're arguing we should just assume by defaultStill you know a cartoon. They have pretty much similar rules like with Popeye and other similar stuff.
That sounds like a one-way trip straight to the hospital if you're using alcohol.Mods he said cuss word, crush his balls.
genuinely gonna start taking shots for every whataboutism brought up here
Like toon force? Or should we just calc every feat and then divide them and take the mean? Or maybe take the median feat.That sounds like a one-way trip straight to the hospital if you're using alcohol.
Also, I VEHEMENTLY disagree with any Varies rating, you do not get that kind of freedom without an in-verse mechanism explaining it.
No, Toon Force has never been considered a good enough reason for a Varies rating in my day.Like toon force? Or should we just calc every feat and then divide them and take the mean? Or maybe take the median feat.
Wasn't SpongeBob Tier 8? That seemed pretty consistentNo one in this thread will be able to find out a consistent rating unless someone watches the entire show
Yeah but its still not superhumanis spongebob picking up a boat car a good LS feat
There's some spongebob guidebook stuff which places cast at quite normal human sizes so that would massively increase size of everything but I don't have that and it would be for another CRT.Isn't Spongebob tiny? That's still below average human
I mean the series itself says he's 4'', I don't think that'd overturn itThere's some spongebob guidebook stuff which places cast at quite normal human sizes so that would massively increase size of everything but I don't have that and it would be for another CRT.
I have already shown countless times that small objects do not matter, one of the cars they used even knocked out a cow to the moon or everything surviving black holes into alternative universe somehow.He has small size on the profile...
First off, "surviving a black hole" isn't a dura feat, it's a resistance (not a dura feat would be relevant here), secondly, they definitely don't seem to survive that, given that it cuts to a parallel universe.
Dude just stop talking, you have not been paying attention, you're points are low down awful, straight up I'm sorry.(This is also a FTL antifeat, by the way!)
Which he did twice in the newer episodes btw, same with lifting ocean on his back feat.I think Spongebob rotating the planet would be the best high end LS replacement feat.
They will keep on mentioning it blindly, despite how contradictory into its own self it is.As a diehard SpongeBob fanand wanker, I think I'm leaning towards agreeing with the downgrade.
Obviously a lot of the lower end outliers (failing to lift plushies, stick with two marshmallows, etc.) should be thrown out due to how they contradict the basic premise of the show (that he is a fry cook that needs to flip patties), but Universal lifting strength is so far out of anything else in the show that its kinda ridiculous.
There are better feats then this anyways.As for a feat to calc, might I suggest using the time Squidward and SpongeBob pulled a ship and an anchor respectively?
Listen, I don't know why you're getting so pissed off about people disagreeing regarding the ratings of a children's cartoon, but it's pretty inexcusable conduct and you've been doing it for a decent while so keep this up and I'm just going to thread-ban you and/or report you.Stop ignoring these points, I'm tired of waking up and dealing with people like you everyday, these lies.
Dude just stop talking, you have not been paying attention, you're points are low down awful, straight up I'm sorry.
its not as bad as the universal LS feat tho tfOk, lets not get with the most absurd LS feats shall we?
That is definitely not true because we see them clearly not being human sized, he's like 4 inches tallThere's some spongebob guidebook stuff which places cast at quite normal human sizes so that would massively increase size of everything but I don't have that and it would be for another CRT.
Well let's see...Listen, I don't know why you're getting so pissed off about people disagreeing regarding the ratings of a children's cartoon, but it's pretty inexcusable conduct so keep this up and I just thread-ban you and/or report you.
... wym? We're talking about him unraveling a universe by pulling a string composing said universe.Yeah if SpongeBob has no feats even BEGINNING to approach uni LS then that shit needs to be downgraded, as for this...
Also, that is pretty wild that you come into the thread saying you reject any Rule of Funny feats while tacitly suggesting you accept any Rule of Funny anti-feats.Okay so cool, all of SpongeBob high ends are also Rule of Funny and we turn all of his stats to Unknown
So? Can he do that consistently?its not as bad as the universal LS feat tho tf
The string is hax, is it not? It's listed as Existance Erasure, something erasing the universe wouldn't be the same mass as it.... wym? We're talking about him unraveling a universe by pulling a string composing said universe.
No one said anything even close to that.Also, that is pretty wild that you come into the thread saying you reject any Rule of Funny feats while tacitly suggesting you accept any Rule of Funny anti-feats.
You might as well just say 'well I don't like this series so downgrade it' at that point xD
Basing his entire tier on one single feat sounds like a really bad idea.... wym? We're talking about him unraveling a universe by pulling a string composing said universe.
This seemed like something discussed and eventually accepted through various discussion/crt threads awhile ago at this point.
I'm not even a supporter of the verse, or that knowledgeable. It just seems that a basic look over of his page and verse shows his main tiering isn't universal. There are various pieces of consistent evidence for Multi-Solar System and Galaxy level being his main tierings, and most importantly:Basing his entire tier on one single feat sounds like a really bad idea.
Like Shmooply said earlier, we're talking about Lifting Strength, not tiering in this thread. His tiering is based on a number of things, and we're only discussing a stat/feat based on one of those 'via hax.'Something tells me this thread's about to derail, so I want to again mention that we're here to discuss replacing the outdated rating with something more consistent, not go back and forth about the "small verse = 10-C!!" argument.
It is hax, but he still has to physically carry and pull the string for it to work. The string itself unravels the universe through the pulling.The string is hax, is it not? It's listed as Existance Erasure, something erasing the universe wouldn't be the same mass as it.
You can see who I replied to, right?No one said anything even close to that.
Do you know how many ******* zeroes there are between Class Z and Universal LS? Let's go high-end Class Z for you, 21 zeroes going by tons, you wanna know how many zeroes there are for Uni? 500. this is not what you call a small outlier.... wym? We're talking about him unraveling a universe by pulling a string composing said universe.
This seemed like something discussed and eventually accepted through various discussion/crt threads awhile ago at this point.
Also, that is pretty wild that you come into the thread saying you reject any Rule of Funny feats while tacitly suggesting you accept any Rule of Funny anti-feats.
You might as well just say 'well I don't like this series so downgrade it' at that point xD
I honest to God don't care, there comes a point where feats on BOTH ENDS need to be dismissed as outliers. Uni LS is one of them, and so is being unable to lift basic shit.
No offense, but you're pretty explicitly engaging in a false dichotomy here, and it's clear you have partiality coming in the thread to dismiss the feat.Okay so cool, all of SpongeBob high ends are also Rule of Funny and we turn all of his stats to Unknown
Also, I don't know how to tell you, but the string did unravel the universe. Again, I suggest looking into the various threads on the matter, and his character page where this is clearly explained.Do you know how many ***** zeroes there are between Class Z and Universal LS? Let's go high-end Class Z for you, 21 zeroes going by tons, you wanna know how many zeroes there are for Uni? 500. this is not what you call a small outlier.
Just adding some more feats in caseWell if we are downgrading the lifting strength, I'd suggest some feats for a better rating
I think the metal wall feat would be unironically Class K
- Ripping up the ground out of sheer anger
- Walking through a metal wall
- Dragged a large anchor (with Squidward dragging an entire boat)
Oh and this. It's with a wrench, but I mean he rotates the whole planet. In any case, these would be more consistent with his main tierings of Multi-Solar System through Galaxy Level.I think Spongebob rotating the planet would be the best high end LS replacement feat.
Like this?Oh and this. It's with a wrench, but I mean he rotates the whole planet.
I don't give a damn about other threads, I'm here in this one, and being blunt with you and saying it's a horrific outlier. If you don't like that I disagree as you stick with your referenceless SpongeBob profiles then I don't know what to tell you.No offense, but you're pretty explicitly engaging in a false dichotomy here, and it's clear you have partiality coming in the thread to dismiss the feat.
You say 'both ends' should be dismissed, but the feat in question, the subject matter of this thread, has been the subject of various threads before being accepted and used.
The feat alone is well established and explained already. As we've established earlier on in this thread as well, characters and their tierings aren't based on anti feats: Characters like Kratos and Goku were brought up, and rightly not downplayed for their 'anti-feats.' Obviously, actual feats matters much more to the character and their tiering. The practicality of saying that both feat and anti-feat are equally 'invalid' here only serves to invalidate the actual feat rather than be 'fair' and invalidate the sporadic anti-feats mentioned.
The practical outcome of 'both ends' being dismissed is the feat being dismissed.
Also, I don't know how to tell you, but the string did unravel the universe. Again, I suggest looking into the various threads on the matter, and his character page where this is clearly explained.