So, about that 4-A "outlier" (Fire Emblem Fates)

[JustSomeWeirdo]

In the final battle of Revelation, Anankos creates a vortex that sucks several islands into a world filled with stars

I've always considered this an outlier, as his previous feats "obliterating a forest" and sucking things into said dimension aren't anywhere close to this

So we have one feat that was written after release in (albeit canon) DLC, and merely bringing things into a dimension

"A 4-A blast would have done more than destroy a forest"

1. AoE Fallacy, that's like saying every single one of Goku's attacks should destroy the universe

2. Anankos is insane, but he isn't dumb, he has manipulated entire kingdoms despite his insanity, and he sure wouldn't destroy Valla, which he Cannot leave without being weakened (42:59)

and the black hole, which I already stated above, was merely bringing things into the dimension

This should honestly scale to King Garo, as he was given power by Anankos and he was capable of performing the black hole feat after getting his power back, and to Conquest!Takumi for being stronger than Garon

 

[The_real_cal_howard]

As much as I would like more people to fight Kirby, we don't know if Anankos creates that dimension. So I'm not even sure if it's a feat, let alone an outlier.

 

[JustSomeWeirdo]

It goes like this

Anankos creates a "black hole"

Black hole sucks everything in

Everything ends up in the dimension, the only thing lacking is an actual statement of him creating it

 

[The_real_cal_howard]

That statement is kinda...needed. Or at least enough to make a reasonable assumption.

 

[JustSomeWeirdo]

I'll check the old fan translations

 

[Dark649]

I think their current rating is fine and this is vague since the lacking statement and is much much higher than anything on the verse like the first fallacy statement does not save the outlier Roshi moon bust feat on the db setting.

 

[JustSomeWeirdo]

It's only higher than things done by people who wouldn't scale at all

 

[JustSomeWeirdo]

As much as I would like more people to fight Kirby

What do you mean? ovo

 

[The_real_cal_howard]

You're right. 4-A vs Low 2-C is still a stomp

 

[JustSomeWeirdo]

I could've sworn smash Kirby was a solid 7-B. Didn't notice the Low part, now the joke is ruined

 

[JustSomeWeirdo]

Welp, there's no statement in the old English Patched version, I'll close this