LOL. That's not what i meant by "statistics", i mean more unknown to the mechanics of his powers, the stuff about his aura in character, his true form is REALLY unknown and most stuff on his profile scale from Rias Gremory. Ajuka is on a whole other level doe.Kaltias said:
Not a thread i just talked to Burning full fingers about this, and since Ajuka has never been in a fight, and the only time Sirzechs has fought was "off pannel" (by fighting i mean actually fighting not completely overpowering the opponent casually), it'd be best to not use them in debates untill they get actually introduced (most things on their profiles are from statements or some kind of scaling).WeeklyBattles said:
Precisely untill we know about a limit on Ajuka and Sirzechs me and burning decided to ban him to avoid NLF arguments on their side which will lead to spite towards the character. Kind of like how everyone hates whenever there is an Ajimu thread eh?Kaltias said:
You think that a 'chat' consisting of a few messages with one person is sufficient enough to straight up ban a character from Vs Debates? That's shady at best dudeFirephoenixearl said:
Yeah Ajuka is not for debate on "ban or not" at all. Sirzechs is still really unknown due to some stuff he has, since most of them are scaling from Rias Gremory whose strongest attack is Sirzechs weakest attack and the fact that the one time we would have seen Sirzechs fight which would be vs trihexia it happened off pannel. Also it also doesn't help that he is Ajuka's rival which makes it all the harder to gague his power due to how much more powerful Ajuka seems. There is also the point about how sirzechs would react in a 1v1 and stuff like that that is unknown about a character.Homu Sweet Homu said:
But threads about him have to stop for a bit to avoid the spite to spread to the whole verse. We are banning him temporarily for a good reason and that is to protect the verse as a whole as well as to avoid NLF arguments on his side. Since there is not much know about this character and more is unknown than known (and unlike your top tier examples this dude is simple, not some multiversal entitiy). He is a normal fighter who we don't know how he would react to a 1v1 fight at all such as the versus debates, would he hold back his passive, would he not hold back (since both cases there have been ppl around him he didn't want to hurt. So rather than a ban i just put it there so that ppl kind of stop this for a while, i even did a thread about stopping the Sirzechs spam for a while but none would listen, and the main content moderator of DxD agreed with this notion, so rather than discussing why he is and why he's not on "ban" can we just let him be in a ban for a while, untill this whole thing just calms down. Since the spite is spreading towards the whole verse (example: after Ajuka's creation and his very 1st match someone put him up against a fairly popular character which would create spite should that not have been closed etc etc, to avoid this kind of behaviour to spread to all of the other characters of the verse, Sirzechs being on holydays for a while would help).Ricsi-viragosi said:
YesWeeklyBattles said:
Answer me:Ricsi-viragosi said:
Should i ask ant about whether that is a good reason for a ban?WeeklyBattles said:
If they are in Central Park he will still hold back.Firephoenixearl said:
Well you can similarly. I mean a hax bypasses tier, when there is no resistance involved doe. Example 7-C hax can beat 3-A without resistance but it doesn't bypass 7-C resistance.Ricsi-viragosi said:
What do you mean?Homu Sweet Homu said:
