• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Shouldn't we increase Player's tier?

And then, there is Flowey's speed in here. Even this wiki pointed out that Flowey constanly appearing following Frisk. Isn't that also easter egg?
 
flowey speed wtf dude?

The player hack eding is something that shouldn't have done normally at the game if so then i am gonna upgrade many players profile because of this

and if we take this canon then i am gonna add at yandere chan page the saitama and sans easter egg at her powers
 
Anonimoe7875 said:
and if we take this canon then i am gonna add at yandere chan page the saitama and sans easter egg at her powers
And this would still be more justifiable than adding powers based on an error-handling message meant to discourage people from hacking.
 
Just like i said, in his page, at speed category "Following frisk through their journey" its clearly from Easter egg, or i don't know, but that one make it clear that Flowey really following Frisk.

Isn't that considered modding from developer it self? I never play that game so i can't deduct much. But that easter egg looks not connected with the story because it just simple "change Appearance an power without anyone react to make it canon" But Player one can make in game character react so it's somehow like fluid canon.
 
But Yandere-chan modding and all is considered non canon because Player is not canon in there. so invalid. But Undertale hint us that Player is Canon so, compare this series to that simulator is rather irrelevant.
 
Blahblah9755 said:
Anonimoe7875 said:
and if we take this canon then i am gonna add at yandere chan page the saitama and sans easter egg at her powers
And this would still be more justifiable than adding powers based on an error-handling message meant to discourage people from hacking.

Isn't that what Sans always do to Chara or Player? To discourage them and reset the timeline to force them choose another route in genocide? And now he discourage Player to never hack.
 
What? Flowey is one of the main characters of Undertale, why would him appearing throughout the story be an Easter Egg? Or even stranger a mod?
 
The player when hack is doing something that shouldn't have done normally at the game show me someone doing it without the need of "hacking the game"

and is not connected too do you rlly want all characters get a upgrade because the player can hack the game and do things that shouldn't have done normally?

And would be invalid because the player is not canon there?

Even if we added many characters would get new power by dumb reasons like Asriel Imortality type 5 because he can't even be touched by the player, yandere chan powers, frisk having 12948129859135 ATK because the player hacked it and made it like that

and Flowey speed feat is something totally diferent from hacking the game for get something and get a easter egg from the creator like the Sans post at Tumblr

rlly even a 11 year old would get why this can't be added
 
And no, Sans discouraging Frisk and Chara from abusing the anomaly's (player's) ability to timeline hop is a core plot point. What you're talking about is a message designed to tell people "hey, if you found a bug tell the dev, he listens. If not, stop hacking." Comparing a core aspect of the plot and gameplay to an error handling message is ludicrous.
 
Actually from what i remenber Sans said at his fight that he wanted the anomaly to stop reseting but yeah it still would be four wall breaking rather than making Sans saying the player stop hacking the game meaning he can hack the game
 
Maybe it does merely error message. But remember, Player is canon which is YOU. Can you seperates where Sans talk to Player or YOU? For me? no, because both of them is actually the same for me.

If its just error message, make it like simple error message. But Toby make it Sans who said it which is one of the major characters in Undertale. And then, can you explain where this is come from in Annoying dog power and abilities page? "Multiversal Constant (Cannot be removed from existence/the game's coding)" and then there is this from its page." Attempting to manually remove the dog from the game's files is impossible, as the dog itself prevents it." Can you explain where this is come from? i might miss this one because this is scream reality fiction to me.
 
So, did altering files become legit? Isn't that our doing then to trigger such thing which make it player's feat. If not, then that power should have been stripped from annoying dog's page.

If its actualy become legit. Player will become like 1A character in undertale since toby actualy forsee we will cheat and make that price to not break the game.

And i agree about reality-fiction one. So, any conclusion?
 
Sans goes to stop the Player from hacking to the end of the game. The Dog has a price and can be bought by hacking and is a mechanic.

Hacking in undertale should be considered legit and maybe something for the Player like "Can existentially break the entire game, turning certain powers into simple jokes, and can manipulate the ATK and DEF of certain characters such as Asriel, and recreate the file so that they could one shot Asriel possibly" considering there are canon hacking additions in the game, most types of hacking should be considered canon.
 
Riiingo said:
Sans goes to stop the Player from hacking to the end of the game. The Dog has a price and can be bought by hacking and is a mechanic.
Hacking in undertale should be considered legit and maybe something for the Player like "Can existentially break the entire game, turning certain powers into simple jokes, and can manipulate the ATK and DEF of certain characters such as Asriel, and recreate the file so that they could one shot Asriel possibly" considering there are canon hacking additions in the game, most types of hacking should be considered canon.
Yeah, he even said "Dirty hacker" to us. Since Sans is the most self-aware character. Even Player can escape Genocide route by deleting certain files and remove his own sin. That's make Player have conceptual manipulation or something similiar.
 
I'm pretty sure that manipulating files isn't valid in any way, otherwise I could make a mod that replaces the UT verse with the DC comics one, making the player tier 0.

I don't have to explain why this is wrong, right?
 
Please. we need confirmation. Annoying dog page is not even changed. His profile that states Multiversal constant still there, if Player feat as hacker is invalid. So is Annoying Dog feat that able to survive in void and cannot be deleted because is also naturally can't happen without us.

If it is valid, we need confirmation and rise Player's tier. This maybe the first reality-fiction esque character i ever encounter.
 
The difference is, AD created Undertale, in the canon version. As soon as you are hacking the game, this is no longer the canon version unless you are Toby Fox
 
Kaltias said:
I'm pretty sure that manipulating files isn't valid in any way, otherwise I could make a mod that replaces the UT verse with the DC comics one, making the player tier 0.
I don't have to explain why this is wrong, right?

Anonimoe7875 states we can't add easter egg. If player can't use his hacker feat since its more like an easter egg. Then so is Annoying dog "Immune to delete files" and "Survive within void" also invalid since its also an easter egg.
 
Kaltias said:
The difference is, AD created Undertale, in the canon version. As soon as you are hacking the game, this is no longer the canon version unless you are Toby Fox
So what? Did that justify how he can "immune to delete file" and "Survive within void"? Without us breaking the game. Those feats will never exist. and just like you said, if we hack the game, is no longer canon so why those feats are considered valid when its only happen through "Non-canon" mean?
 
Back
Top