- 4,524
- 2,242
That can be discussed later. Right now, the priority isn't getting the verse to 1A, but to get the verse back at all
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
SHINZA IS BACK!!!!!
- Thread starter PrinceofPein
- Start date
- Status
- 4,524
- 2,242
First of all, these scans aren't in the blog at all, so it's just baseless claims as of now. Especially witht he layers of laws or whatever. There is zero implication that laws layer on each other or something like that
- 4,524
- 2,242
Basically, Shinza would become 1A and the old profiles would be brought back with the changes. That seems to be what the conclusions of the blog are
Darksmash
He/Him- 1,494
- 1,640
He's asking conclusions of the thread, not the "blog"
- 107
- 93
Cuz I had not time to send them
- 4,524
- 2,242
How is that any different?
- 4,060
- 1,713
there is nothing agreed on the thread so far btw. The admins haven't evaluated anything
- 4,524
- 2,242
Oh, I meant the conclusions of the thread that are being aimed for, not what's actually agreed upon. In that regard, there are no conclusions, It's a shithole without any actual direction
- 4,524
- 2,242
The blog makes the arguments. You can agree or disagree with that
Darksmash
He/Him- 1,494
- 1,640
So onto the actual topic: Whether the verse should be brought back or not. From what I am seeing here the work done on the verse during the time it wasn't on the wiki is nonexistent and the blog is quite literally just copypasting previous info with very minor differences and some small sections for the newer works. It also seems that the Shinza supporters here didn't have any coordination on this project whatsoever and don't even agree with each other on details about the verse.
So I would disagree with this thread.
So I would disagree with this thread.
Darksmash
He/Him- 1,494
- 1,640
I think a better attempt can be made later when the fans coordinate and decide upon a consistent interpretation with a good blog instead of having inner disagreements and everything being all over the place. But I am disagreeing for now.
- 4,524
- 2,242
This is a reasonable point, yeah. We had over a year, yet this felt like it was still rushed and disorganized. But, just because I was part of the server and provided some scans to be used, I'll remain neutral for now.
Chasekilleen
He/Him- 432
- 360
Could you please refrain from mentioning me in any context related to the Shinza Banshou series and its battle-boarding discussions? I would like to completely disassociate myself from these topics. And I honestly did not want to bring this up but I find it a tad rude and currently irritated that I was mentioned or even listed as a supporter when I explicitly said twice in private chats that I do not want to be included in any Shinza Banshou threads. Seriously, I am honestly not happy that I wasn't informed of prior to this thread being posted.
Please, stop asking for my opinion from here on out, I'm really not interested in Shinza battle-boarding.
Please, stop asking for my opinion from here on out, I'm really not interested in Shinza battle-boarding.
- 946
- 830
Really? Then I didn't see anything that qualifies.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
- Thread starter
- #259
Can you guys stop with the needless derailing, the blog was put together hastily to explain the cosmology as per DT request, the tiers they would qualify for based on the blog was also added as per his request.
Some keep saying there are lots of misinformation in the thread and when asked to point one out, you pointed out a kanji mistake, another was just being dishonest.
Again, if you have something in the blog that is not true bring actual arguments or stay your peace, it is not wrong cause you say it is wrong, if you feel like any information in the blog was flasified, bring it out also, stop clogging up the thread.
@Chasekilleen I did not mention you as a battle boarder or supporter of the verse, but rather someone who helped with the TL
@Tarang123 you can just edit your previous post, stop multi-posting.
@Tarang123 and @Darksmash what do you mean it is the same information as the previous shinza? I do not understand, did we write another shinza? or why are shocked that I am using the same scans and statements that may have been used before? Am I supposed to write another shinza or write a blog while making sure I did not mentiion something that has ben used before shinza was deleted? I am honestly still trying to wrap my heads around it, it is the same shinza so yes you are bound to see some things you have seen before, just this time I at least explained and not using things out of context or using mistranslations - Like justify your claims that says it is almost as the same as the previous upgrade reason, firstly half of what is in the blog, like the explanation and stuffs has never being used in any blog also not to details like that with all the scans.
Also for those asking for the reasons for 1-A: here it is:
1-A is not hard, if your verse does not have infinite dimensions, you just have to prove you are above the dimensions even if your verse has just a regular 4-D universe. We know for a fact that Dimensions in the verse hold ontological difference, as shown in PL and explicity stated in k3, And in the blog you will see in the first era, we have a single regular universe, then we have a universe consisted of 12 Dimensions, then in the next one we know little about, but the one after that the fourth era, we have a regular universe although they are infinite in number compared to the last one. And also there are tons of scans that says the Gods, throne, taikyoku and singularity is above creation, and there is one that says "they have control over all of creation while disconnected from it" and many more that says they are the origin of all laws, concepts and phenomenons in the verse.
By default they indeed transcend all laws, phenomenons and concept in the verse, so yes that is enough for 1-A.
Bolding this so people can see it, I will not be bothered to reply to messages that are derailing or irrelevant, if you have some valid contentions bring it up, else let us wait for DT to evaluate the blog
Some keep saying there are lots of misinformation in the thread and when asked to point one out, you pointed out a kanji mistake, another was just being dishonest.
Again, if you have something in the blog that is not true bring actual arguments or stay your peace, it is not wrong cause you say it is wrong, if you feel like any information in the blog was flasified, bring it out also, stop clogging up the thread.
@Chasekilleen I did not mention you as a battle boarder or supporter of the verse, but rather someone who helped with the TL
@Tarang123 you can just edit your previous post, stop multi-posting.
@Tarang123 and @Darksmash what do you mean it is the same information as the previous shinza? I do not understand, did we write another shinza? or why are shocked that I am using the same scans and statements that may have been used before? Am I supposed to write another shinza or write a blog while making sure I did not mentiion something that has ben used before shinza was deleted? I am honestly still trying to wrap my heads around it, it is the same shinza so yes you are bound to see some things you have seen before, just this time I at least explained and not using things out of context or using mistranslations - Like justify your claims that says it is almost as the same as the previous upgrade reason, firstly half of what is in the blog, like the explanation and stuffs has never being used in any blog also not to details like that with all the scans.
Also for those asking for the reasons for 1-A: here it is:
1-A is not hard, if your verse does not have infinite dimensions, you just have to prove you are above the dimensions even if your verse has just a regular 4-D universe. We know for a fact that Dimensions in the verse hold ontological difference, as shown in PL and explicity stated in k3, And in the blog you will see in the first era, we have a single regular universe, then we have a universe consisted of 12 Dimensions, then in the next one we know little about, but the one after that the fourth era, we have a regular universe although they are infinite in number compared to the last one. And also there are tons of scans that says the Gods, throne, taikyoku and singularity is above creation, and there is one that says "they have control over all of creation while disconnected from it" and many more that says they are the origin of all laws, concepts and phenomenons in the verse.
By default they indeed transcend all laws, phenomenons and concept in the verse, so yes that is enough for 1-A.
Bolding this so people can see it, I will not be bothered to reply to messages that are derailing or irrelevant, if you have some valid contentions bring it up, else let us wait for DT to evaluate the blog
- 770
- 504
Paradise Lost does have more than just 10D. You should check the script.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
- Thread starter
- #261
hey I read what you said in the previous pages, I was planning on ignoring it as I cannot be bothered to get into the argument but I will say the leylines are not dimensions. Anyway if you want me to explain it to you I will in the DM and not here
- 532
- 768
I guess I'm neutral too (I guess the opinion of non-staff is not so important, but I guess it's okay if I mention it anyway)
Because what Darksmash said really makes sense. It's a bit obvious that there is no coordination between the supporters, and I think Chase's words more or less support that. (But I don't think that should be a reason not to add the verse to the wiki, because it's an easily fixable problem)
The Cosmology Blog also seems to be incomplete, but for some reason it seems to focus more on why it should be 1-A than on providing information about cosmology in general. And I don't think it should be like that.
(And I guess I'm not going to comment further so that the thread doesn't get more chaotic)
Because what Darksmash said really makes sense. It's a bit obvious that there is no coordination between the supporters, and I think Chase's words more or less support that. (But I don't think that should be a reason not to add the verse to the wiki, because it's an easily fixable problem)
The Cosmology Blog also seems to be incomplete, but for some reason it seems to focus more on why it should be 1-A than on providing information about cosmology in general. And I don't think it should be like that.
(And I guess I'm not going to comment further so that the thread doesn't get more chaotic)
Last edited:
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
- Thread starter
- #263
chase is a TL he does not want anything to do with battleboarding, I think I mentioned that in the OP about him being the translator
Actually the cosmology is the throne, the singularity and tiakyoku, the universes themselves has little to go on off.
And let me call you out on dishonesty there, the blog did not even get to versus tiering till the last section and has just like 5 lines on it, so that is obviously wrong what you just said now.
the first 95% of the blog focuses on just what the cosmology is and the last 5% what they would qualify for. In fact the tiering system part was not there until DT said I should add it, so what do you mean the blog just focuses on why they should 1-A?
You guys need to really stop this thing, someone who did not go through the blog may have taken your words for it and clearly you also did not go through it properly
- 107
- 93
I think we should do like suigin said just get the verse back and then the tiers will be decided when we will have more coordination, I admit too that I and suigin don't agree on everything so threads in the future will be better(maybe cuz I prefer more to adjust their profiles rather than working on the cosmology stuffs)
- 946
- 830
If the evidence is sufficient enough then it's probably fine but I don't see anything that qualifies for 1-A even the FAQ as proven above would change soon according to ultima.
If they are proven to be qualitatively superior then it's fine for 1-B.
If i'm being honest here, read the FAQ and tiering system page and I still don't see 1-A from the blog but let's see @DontTalkDT evaluation on it.
- 532
- 768
I know that, but I thought if we're going to talk about cosmology, it's not a bad thing to talk about multiverses and multiple timelines within universes and things like that. That was just an idea.
I already said in my comment that the blog is not yet complete, so I don't see why what I said is a dishonesty.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
- Thread starter
- #268
this is false, check the blog again
and that is not relevant right now
- 4,524
- 2,242
What Darksmash means is that they're the same arguments that got the verse to 1A in the past, while not countering any of the stuff from Yuri's downgrade. This was something I specifically said needed to be done before any kind of 1A upgrade.
As well as that, you are copy-pasting text from the Shinza wiki without crediting them.
You have to prove that you are above any number of dimensional constructs (in oversimplified terms). Where'd you get the 12 dimensions? I also have to point out that simply being able to control all of existence and being above it (even with some number of dimensions) doesn't particularly equate to 1A. Just a little note. I don't agree or disagree with the 1A logic.
Last I remembered, transcending concepts isn't really 1A. In fact, the biggest downgrading point was that transcending concepts wasn't enough as Shinza supposedly had evidence of being bound to dimensional stuff. That's why I said you'd have to first debunk Yuri's downgrade
- 4,524
- 2,242
I was talking to Ultima. He said that isn't really going to change too much. Being above a cosmology regardless of dimensional stuff could still become 1A, given context.
- 107
- 93
It is pretty easy to debunk that btw
- 4,524
- 2,242
I mean, it's a cosmology blog.
- 4,524
- 2,242
Okay, but until that's debunked, the reasoning for 1A hits a pretty big road block
- 107
- 93
So we should make a thread against the downgrade of Yuri to say how it is wrong?
- 4,524
- 2,242
Let me explain what I said before. What I said before (like way earlier) is that the Shinza profiles should be brought back to their former 1B states. Then, in a CRT with the cosmology blog or whatever the ****, we can make changes and discuss the actual tier of the verse.
Edit: I also want to point out that I will now stand with the disagree side. I think the cosmology blog needs to be fully fleshed out before we start making CRTs and arguments for tiers
Last edited:
- 107
- 93
OK and I alr said I agree with this way of bringing Shinza back
- 946
- 830
Still gonna change, currently it talks about a structure being independent of the number of layers/dimensions present on the setting, if they are unaffected by dimensions being arbitrarily added or removed from physical space by virtue of transcending it entirely, or if they exist as a "background" or canvas of sorts in which any amount of them can be inserted.
He said even a single transcendence can do this and will probably be changed, probably in a way similar to the root that's stated to be beyond any dimensional structure, but let's wait and see how he plans to update it.
- 4,524
- 2,242
I directly asked him, though...let me just quote what he said.
He's basically saying that it would still be 1A, with context. Of course, without context it could just be High 1B, which is beyond any expansion of finite dimensions.
All he said is that all things being zero or whatever is the equivalent of a singular transcendence.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
- Thread starter
- #280
all the stuffs from Yuri downgrade as to do with mistranslation and the gods being referred to as Higher dimensional, but hey news flash, even a tier 0 can be referred to as higher dimensional by a 3-D and it will not change anything
not the offical blog and this will be deleted, after the blog is made into a page, also it is the wiki. or rather let me say this is just a blog the actual cosomology will be in a page
are you sure you also read the blog?
I already did that in the blog, again lets wait for the knowledgeable staffs to decide.
I never said the reason for the 1-A is just transcending concepts, please and please read this thing.
And again nothing to debunk from Yuri's downgrade, you can call tier 0 higher D and nothing changes.
prove you did not read what I wrote in the blog, so I will imploy you to read again. If I added the throne to be a regular dimension we will be talking about 13. (4+9) and not (4+8)
Also the throne being called one of the 10 dimensions in PL does not debunk anything especially since it was shown to be inacessible, also news flash tier 0 can have dimensions now
In your head? yes
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, TAKE THE DERAILINGS OUT, NO ONE CARES HERE ABOUT WHAT ULTIMA MAY OR MAY NOT DO IN THE FUTURE, IF HE DOES IT AND IT AFFECTS SHINZA WE WILL FIX IT ACCORDINGLY, BUT RIGHT NOW BASED ON THE TIERING SYSTEM THIS IS WHAT I AM TABLING.
That siad I have read Yuri's downgrade more than 10 times, and again the same thing Trex said it is is just filled with misinformation and more importantly, the gods being referred to as Higher D, means nothing as an excuse against 1-A anymore.
- Status
